Jump to content

Pedrowe

Members
  • Posts

    141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

120

About Pedrowe

  • Birthday August 16

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    London

Recent Profile Visitors

2482 profile views
  1. https://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2023-11-03/we-want-promotion-this-year-bristol-city-board-on-sacking-nigel-pearson?utm_source=NewsApp&utm_medium=SocialShare
  2. I'm quite baffled by the current lack of communication from the Lansdowns. Back in the 2000s, Steve Lansdown was actively involved with the OTIB community. I remember the "Ask SL" subforum, regular Q&A sessions throughout the season, and even away Q&A sessions, like the one in a pub in Bradford around 2012 where both Jon and Steve both participated. I think there was one in Nottingham as well, wasn't there? Additionally, Steve used to address fans on the pitch at the first and last games of the season and frequently gave interviews on BBC Radio Bristol, either on match days or with Geoff Twentyman on Sound of the City/Twentyman Talks Back. We were often considered a good example of communication between owners and the fan base in conversations with rival fans. However, it seems like all of that has faded away now to naff all. There are numerous conspiracy theories circulating, especially about takeovers, but regardless of the cause, it's been quite a dramatic shift. It's a shame that Twentyman has retired because I would really appreciate some robust questioning if the BBC manages to persuade someone at the Club to give an interview!
  3. I agree. We shouldn't be afraid of change or the unknown. The Lansdowns' dedication to the club and their financial support are undeniable. However, it's evident that something has changed over the past five years (particularly post COVID). Steve Lansdown used to be more engaged with fans and had a clearer vision for the future, which seems to have faded. We shouldn't shy away from the idea of new ownership. Crystal Palace, for instance, thrived under new owners after facing administration, securing over a decade in the Premier League. Ultimately, Bristol City offers an appealing investment opportunity to an investor, and there aren’t that many clubs in the same position. With a modern stadium, best in class training facilities, a substantial fan base, and minimal debt (except that owed to the Lansdowns), we’re ready to step up but need that added investment and expertise to make the jump.
  4. It's poor that there has been no communication from the club, and the news has surfaced through supporters and local press. The club should have taken control of the situation and issued an announcement on Friday to manage the narrative. Now, they find themselves on the back foot. Highlights that SL/JL have taken their hands off the wheel!
  5. Pedrowe

    Arena

    There was a delay due to the legal agreement with the Council, but that’s now sorted and the planning permission was issued on Tuesday (22 Aug). It’s now on the Council’s website. So, subject to satisfying the pre-commencement planning conditions, work can then commence.
  6. That statement is an outright lie. The reality is that Rovers knowingly demolished part of their stadium (albeit a tent) and sold tickets without obtaining the required planning permission. That decision involved a considerable development risk, and one they would have been fully aware of. Having worked in planning and development for nearly 20 years, I have never come across such reckless behaviour from what should be a professional organisation. Although they now admit that the stand won't be ready, they had complete control over the factors that caused the delay, making any other claim misleading. Put simply, the delay was caused by their incompetence in submitting a low-quality planning application late in the process. As pointed out by KITR, the next planning committee meeting isn't until early September, and considering the raised issues, it's likely that the Council may require additional detail and public consultation, and that could lead to further delays until October. Hence, it’s going to take at least another 8-12 weeks for the stand to be completed in line with a planning permission. I cannot believe that the EFL and the opposition sides impacted during that period will be too pleased with playing in a ground with no seats or disabled facilities for their supporters. They’re actually a circus.
  7. I noticed that someone on Gas Chat was questioning how Luton managed to construct their stand this summer. The answer lies in their professionalism as a club compared to their tinpot rag tag excuse of a club. Luton actually applied for planning permission for the new stand c12 months ago, anticipating the need for upgrades in case they secured promotion.
  8. Just had a look at the current sentiment on Gas Chat (?)…, and bizarrely, they are primarily pointing fingers at the Green Party for the current predicament?!?! Unsurprisingly, little blame is being attributed to the management of the Club, which recklessly began operations without planning permission, disregarded the concerns of neighbouring residents, submitted a subpar application with insufficient time, and even sold season tickets despite lacking a proper stand to accommodate them in for the opening fixtures. I can’t imagine that we would stand for that down here!
  9. BBC is now reporting on the circus https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-66342084 They’ve got themselves in real mess and it’s all for a little tiddler of a stand!
  10. It's a calamitous situation. Anyone involved in planning/construction/real estate (or anyone with basic common sense) is aware of the risks associated with the planning system in England, especially in a city like Bristol, where there is an informed and active community. At the end of the day, it's just a small stand. If they had followed professional advice, conducted a thorough public consultation, and submitted a well-prepared application in a timely manner, they would likely have obtained planning permission without any issues. However, their decision to start work without permission, along with their subpar application and insufficient time given to the Council to review it, has led to a self-inflicted mess. They've essentially caused this problem themselves. Undoubtedly they’ll start blaming the Council and everyone but themselves. However the fact of the matter is it all could’ve been avoided if they had done the job properly.
  11. It’ll be interesting to see how the planning application plays out. It’s pretty minor scheme in the grand scheme of things, but the quality of application itself is appalling. It barely gives any detail for residents to understand the impacts of the proposal. I’d imagine the good people of Horfield (wasn’t there a campaign group before?, Residents Opposed to Stadium Expansion, ROSE??) will kick up enough of a stink to get it to a planning committee and delay it a bit. That said, it seems like Rovers are ploughing on regardless, which is an interesting approach to maintaining good relations with their neighbours…
  12. I expect that’s precisely how it’ll play out. A considerate way to treat your neighbours…
  13. The planning application hasn’t even been registered yet ?. As we’re aware, Bristol City Council isn’t widely renowned for their swift decision-making... Typically, applications of this nature require a period of 8-13+ weeks to navigate through the system, which means they could be waiting right up to the beginning of the new season (presuming the application is registered in the next week or so). There is also a possibility that the application might be subject to review by a planning committee, especially if concerns are raised by residents in Horfield. It’s so tinpot and unprofessional from Rovers to be leaving the planning process until the last minute, especially when they’re selling season tickets for a stand that hasn’t got planning permission. Surely they could’ve done it months ago ?? This probably isn’t going to end well… ?
  14. The Council still hasn’t released the planning permission. Presumably there has been a delay signing the legal agreement (section 106).
×
×
  • Create New...