Jump to content

WTFiGO!?!

Members
  • Posts

    9431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by WTFiGO!?!

  1. ' Nottingham' will suffice, none of this respect-giving 'Nottingham Forest' stuff, or simply 'Forest'! They won't mind, they're not petty.
  2. Why of course Complex needs, challenging behaviour, attachment issues, material deprivation, cultural deprivation, low intelligence, limited education, pathological isms/intolerance of others, pathological lyers, a history of sexual and cross-species abuse, a history of homelessness, borderline personality disorder, persecution complex, hypermanic, ungrounded unfounded fear, have I mentioned anything about delusional yet? I believe a 4-0 loss has also sent them overnight from possible play-off contenders to the bridge so bi-polar tendencies as well. A psychiatrists wet dream if ever there was one. I jest of course - for anyone genuinely affected by any of the above diagnoses and issues.
  3. Grandiose, narcissistic, ego-centric, entitled, removed from reality, lacking in self-awareness, alternative reality, victim mentality ...... take your pick
  4. I didn't need to read anymore. It's taken 18 months but it seems the penny is finally dropping. I'm a kid with a new toy this morning ... Feel the rhythm, feel the ride. Come on Jamaica its Screenshot time....
  5. Indeed, in the same way that there's no need to write a parody. I don't think I could anyway, the critics would say it was too far fetched. In Rovers' case, the writer would actually have to dumb it down to make it believable.
  6. What's it called when you take a picture of the image on an apple I-phone by reading the round button at the bottom and the mute switch at the top, then? like thus...
  7. Cool. That's another club in the bag, then.
  8. I've only learned in the last couple of days how to 'photoshop' is it? Anyway, here goes with my first attempt
  9. A bit like the Wealston Raider or whoever he was, when fiction meets reality: It's as though it's a comedic character from Harry Enfield, The Fast Show or something but it's not.
  10. "....... and I'm a deluded, racist horsepuncher."
  11. Did they take a hundred million fans to Wolves in the end then, or not?
  12. I see our friend from Henbury is addling his own little brain again. On the one hand it was only 'alleged' racist language and on the other "the gentleman in question is from the old school and does not see anything wrong about using the same language that was acceptable in the 1970's". Our friend from Henbury hopes the club will provide him with some education (effectively admitting that it wasn't alleged at all but did actually take place, thus contradicting himself). There's also this bizarre defence that the gentleman in question has done a lot of good works for others - predominantly white, Bristolian R*vers fans by the looks of things. In the mind of our friend from Henbury, philanthropy and racism obviously can not be mutually exclusive.
  13. The only sensible post on there was that words mean nothing. For Wally read MA.
  14. I never did quite work out what R*vers were singing during the JPT game a few years ago. Something about a huge stallion, a palladium, new stadium? I could make head nor tail of it
  15. Funnily enough, I was only watching that the other day. "I mean what a stupid place to put a bridge. Right over a river like that...".
  16. Courtesy of redsince82 on Ziderheads: http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/horse-racing/41159983 It doesn't mention Davy Russell is also a gas head but the journalist probably felt that went without saying.
  17. I need a new captain for my boat, it's a bloody shame the Titanic guy's no longer with us!
  18. Well there's that and there's that Darrell hasn't got round to collecting all the subs in yet for the new season. It'll get to the point whereby he'll have to enforce a no subs/no game time policy. He doesn't want to do it but he's already sent letters home to parents. He doesn't know what else he can do.
  19. I'm no accountant or economist so am by no means an authority on the matter. If you roll back several pages however, a poster 'Rich' has researched it properly. The deal apparently is that the rugby club was truly up shit creek (struggling to adapt to professionalism) so the Bristol RFC chairman Arthur Holmes allowed the pirates to purchase half the ground with the agreement that should one of the clubs actually go under, the other could buy the ground out for a minimal fee. Arthur Holmes happened to be a gas head as well as a Bristol RFC man and when the Rugby club did go into administration, the pirates cleaned up. The Rugby club was always going to be the first to fold, it was inevitable. Holmes was given some title at the sags, as reward. The Sags did not treat their new lodgers with much respect and resentment grew. Bristol RFC has since been saved and relocated. This is costing the Sags, hilariously. R*vers have since tried to sue a national cooperation for withdrawing from purchasing the War Memorial that was purchased controversially and was readily trying to be flogged off for their own grubby ends. This used to fancy itself as a family club. Is it still proporting the same because I frankly don't see it. Growing up in a school of Sags I saw them to be on some kind of moral pedastool as they weren't the thugs. I've since seen that to be the complete and utter load of bollox that it is.
×
×
  • Create New...