AndrewBCFC1 Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 It has been pretty boring so far but the best bit has got to be the Coventry fan who dosen't know the words to the chants https://vine.co/v/OObX6iTwwPM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gasbuster Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 I don't have a clue who the hell this "singer" is ? Just dreadful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bs3 Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 About time they call time on that show. Well past its sell by date by nearly ten years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Rizzle Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 About time they call time on that show. Well past its sell by date by nearly ten years. Think Lovejoy got out at the right time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Hitler Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 That "Coventry fan" is laughable. I thought there was a selection procedure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 it should be scrapped or get some new presenters. Chamberlain is too old and looking dog rough these days and Rushden is truly awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 it should be scrapped or get some new presenters. Chamberlain is too old and looking dog rough these days and Rushden is truly awful. Not a dig at you by any means, more an observation, but I always find it interesting how many female presenters still get judged at least partly on how they look, whilst the male ones on how good they are. She still knocks spots off Rushden for me as a footie presenter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 Not a dig at you by any means, more an observation, but I always find it interesting how many female presenters still get judged at least partly on how they look, whilst the male ones on how good they are. She still knocks spots off Rushden for me as a footie presenter. Sky employ female presenters on how they look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lack of Action Man Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 About time they call time on that show. Well past its sell by date by nearly ten years. I disagree, I have really enjoyed this season's run. I just think they need to get rid of rocket and his lanky mate and actually bring in someone with comic timing. Other than that, still essential Saturday morning viewing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Hitler Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 Not a dig at you by any means, more an observation, but I always find it interesting how many female presenters still get judged at least partly on how they look, whilst the male ones on how good they are. She still knocks spots off Rushden for me as a footie presenter. Women get jobs based upon their looks; men don't so have to be talented to get jobs. The Big Breakfast was the prime example: Johnny Vaughan making all the running and all the jokes and the very attractive Kelly Brook sat there laughing but actually contributing no more than a member of the audience. That's what got the viewing figures up which paid for the show. As Helen Chamberlain is also a good presenter she gets to keep the job and now on talent; nobody will give Kelly Brook a presenting job again now she's fifteen years older. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 Sky employ female presenters on how they look. I do not doubt that is true as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BITW Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 Surprised anyone still watches it tbh. Haven't watched it in years so maybe it's improved? But it started getting shite a few years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 Sky employ female presenters on how they look. Totally different from their criteria for male presenters, of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exAtyeoMax Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 Women get jobs based upon their looks; men don't so have to be talented to get jobs. The Big Breakfast was the prime example: Johnny Vaughan making all the running and all the jokes and the very attractive Kelly Brook sat there laughing but actually contributing no more than a member of the audience. That's what got the viewing figures up which paid for the show. As Helen Chamberlain is also a good presenter she gets to keep the job and now on talent; nobody will give Kelly Brook a presenting job again now she's fifteen years older. Didn't they replace Kelly Brook with Liza Tarbuck because she was so dreadful though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Hitler Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 Didn't they replace Kelly Brook with Liza Tarbuck because she was so dreadful though? I think they did, and very good she was too. She was somebody who had had to make it on talent because she wasn't conventionally attractive. The difference is that if you are a stunningly attractive 20 something then if you are a woman you get your pick of modelling, presenting, reality shows and can make an absolute fortune. If you are a man you will get none of this, as evidenced by one simple question: Name a current male model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted November 1, 2014 Report Share Posted November 1, 2014 Women get jobs based upon their looks; men don't so have to be talented to get jobs. The Big Breakfast was the prime example: Johnny Vaughan making all the running and all the jokes and the very attractive Kelly Brook sat there laughing but actually contributing no more than a member of the audience. That's what got the viewing figures up which paid for the show. As Helen Chamberlain is also a good presenter she gets to keep the job and now on talent; nobody will give Kelly Brook a presenting job again now she's fifteen years older. The great thing about Helen Chamberlain is that she realises that the show is an adult(-ish) version of Tiswas. Humour isn't about glam, it's about being funny, which she does well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.