Snufflelufagus Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 Pleased for him today had a solid game. He is certainly a better defender than Bryan but not as good going forward. It does mean if he does play bryan could also play in a more advanced role. He hardly gives the ball away and think now he certainly deserves to keep his place for a run in the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 Thought Golbourne had a decent game in the same position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelts Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 I like Scott a very experienced player. Think LJ is maybe a little undecided on the left side for the best fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 Thought he was steady today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 Had Joe started instead of Freeman today, that would be my preferred starting XI, form and fitness accepted. SG is trying to do more in advanced positions, had a 10 yard volley blocked at the far list in the second half. Think Hordur and him look solid on the left side of our defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 15 minutes ago, Davefevs said: Had Joe started instead of Freeman today, that would be my preferred starting XI, form and fitness accepted. SG is trying to do more in advanced positions, had a 10 yard volley blocked at the far list in the second half. Think Hordur and him look solid on the left side of our defence. I think most of us would agree with all of that. If Goldbourne can add some attacking qualities to his game on a regular basis it'll be happy days for all concerned. Not sure why Bryan didn't start today, rumour was that he got a knock at QPR of Tuesday.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Between heaven and hell Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 For me it's so obvious Scott is number one left back and Joe is left mid. Stick to this week in and week out to form a partnership so they will both improve! Easy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 15 minutes ago, Robbored said: I think most of us would agree with all of that. If Goldbourne can add some attacking qualities to his game on a regular basis it'll be happy days for all concerned. Not sure why Bryan didn't start today, rumour was that he got a knock at QPR of Tuesday.... Who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 2 minutes ago, JamesBCFC said: Who? Someone at AG today mentioned that I'd spelt his name wrong. Looks like I've done it again.......... From now I'll use his initials - SG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvio Dante Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 Again, its interesting how people see things differently. I like Scott, I think he's a better defender than Joe, but today to me he seemed hesitant and unsure. The thing I thought he did well was stick to the left side, whereas I thought AM went far too central. For me today - positionally 8/10, general 5/10. Feel free to disagree... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Between heaven and hell Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 19 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said: Again, its interesting how people see things differently. I like Scott, I think he's a better defender than Joe, but today to me he seemed hesitant and unsure. The thing I thought he did well was stick to the left side, whereas I thought AM went far too central. For me today - positionally 8/10, general 5/10. Feel free to disagree... For the last fifteen minutes he had no left mid in front of him as we made substitutions to put an extra body up front. At times he was pushing on to come in late on the back post, then in the next breath he was charging back to help cover. Great game, solid left back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonM88 Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 49 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said: Again, its interesting how people see things differently. I like Scott, I think he's a better defender than Joe, but today to me he seemed hesitant and unsure. The thing I thought he did well was stick to the left side, whereas I thought AM went far too central. For me today - positionally 8/10, general 5/10. Feel free to disagree... Thank god I have your permission to disagree because I bloody well do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 10 hours ago, Silvio Dante said: Again, its interesting how people see things differently. I like Scott, I think he's a better defender than Joe, but today to me he seemed hesitant and unsure. The thing I thought he did well was stick to the left side, whereas I thought AM went far too central. For me today - positionally 8/10, general 5/10. Feel free to disagree... Agree that AM played very narrow, especially from kick-outs from Steele. I'm sure this was to plan, and when fit and on form, his covering of Flint is exemplary. He and an under-par Paterson had a couple of bright interplays around the half hour mark, but I feel he was playing within himself, easing himself back to fitness. I'm sure the 'hammer' is both physical and mental at the mo'. I saw enough in his loan spell to think he is very accomplished at this level when on-song. Taylor Moore was positive going forward when he came on, which is another plus for the squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy082005 Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 11 hours ago, Snufflelufagus said: Pleased for him today had a solid game. He is certainly a better defender than Bryan but not as good going forward. It does mean if he does play bryan could also play in a more advanced role. He hardly gives the ball away and think now he certainly deserves to keep his place for a run in the team. Yeah solid game. For me...Goldborne would suit a 4-4-2 formation more so then the one we play. He is a solid left back. I think we lose something going forward when he starts. We don't look the attacking threat we do when Bryan starts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roe Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Is it really that hard to remember one of our players' names? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dolman Pragmatist Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 Steady and solid seem to be the adjectives, but Joe Bryan undoubtedly offers us much more going forward. Golbourne doesn't do too much in 'the final third' which is fine if you are not asking him to, but sometimes attacking moves on the left get bogged down because of his involvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 4 minutes ago, The Dolman Pragmatist said: Steady and solid seem to be the adjectives, but Joe Bryan undoubtedly offers us much more going forward. Golbourne doesn't do too much in 'the final third' which is fine if you are not asking him to, but sometimes attacking moves on the left get bogged down because of his involvement. Im guessing that you haven't scrolled through this thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.