Esmond Million's Bung Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 9 minutes ago, cynic said: Is the swear filter working now ? test..........fuckity fuck fuck in my defence, apparently Kris Marshall is leaving the BBC's death in paradise and it would appear that he is being replaced by father Douglas Maguire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrick's Marvels Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 2 hours ago, 1960maaan said: Apart from the fact it's them. and they regularly do an impression of a 13 year old girl when things don't go their way. They are not the first team to have a clause met, as said above , Arsenal bidding 1p above is a real pisstake but as far as I'm aware they didn't run to 'Sir' , though they did moan a lot. I'm not sure of the rules but, the clause was put in by Taylor and his agent (I'm guessing they knew about it then). What's to stop the agent talking to people or other agents? They happily go around touting their player to anyone even while he's still in contract, so what's the difference? Have to ask why they always play the victim , getting old now. You do grasp the concept of insults, don't you? Serious question. If someone called you a wanker (for example) would you happily walk round telling people , yeah I'm a wanker ? Shithead is 'their' playground attempt at an insult, it really bugs me this, what next calling the this to be put on the shirts instead of 'the Robins' ??? No offence , but this is a real bugbear of mine. And mine. 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, cynic said: NOOO ! Feck. And worst of all auto correct changed Dougal to Douglas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Septic Peg Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 34 minutes ago, Taxi for Johnson said: In the interests of balance, they did win the Freight Rover trophy once and at least one of their stands has got a roof made of tarpaulin. Fixed that for you. 22 minutes ago, Esmond Million's Bung said: in my defence, apparently Kris Marshall is leaving the BBC's death in paradise and it would appear that he is being replaced by father Douglas Maguire. It's Father Dougal Maguire. #knowyourFatherTed Edit: Just seen your autocorrect explanation. As you were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsquirrel Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 13 hours ago, Tipps69 said: Another waste of time & money!! How are they going to prove anything? And even if they can, what are they going to do about it? Surely at the end of the day, if the player wants a move & he's aware of a clause (which he'd be stupid if he didn't), it's in his best interest to put the figure out there? Different if his clause was £10m because he'd know no one would be willing to meet that but if if it's in his best interest (enhances his chances of a pay rise, instant promotion, better standard of everything) then he'd be stupid to not let it slip........... For arguments sake, what happens if MT mentions the fee to his missus (if he has one), she mentions it to a friend & eventually it gets to someone involved with another club & they act on it? Or are a potential buying club supposed to offer £2m knowing that he's available for the fraction of the price? Or what's to stop a club from just making an offer, it gets accepted & then the buying club withdraws it's offer but comes back with a reduced offer but still above or matching the release clause & that just continues until it gets to the limit, we just saved a lot of time....... Their just clutching at straws, they know they've been royally done over & are trying to save face, bless em!! if his misses lived in nailsea,it would be common knowledge to everyone within 24hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelts Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 1 hour ago, Sniper said: So I'm going to guess..... Another SHAGgate Alcohol Gambling He's had to call out CR Windows twice already No advertising on this site please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scare_Man Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 Wasn't our bid of the 'undisclosed' nature? I'm sure it was so who released this information that it was bang on the release clause figure? Sue them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 19 minutes ago, Septic Peg said: Fixed that for you. It's Father Dougal Maguire. #knowyourFatherTed Edit: Just seen your autocorrect explanation. As you were. Premature ejacreaction is quite common I am led to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 5 minutes ago, Scare_Man said: Wasn't our bid of the 'undisclosed' nature? I'm sure it was so who released this information that it was bang on the release clause figure? Sue them! it's undisclosed publicly what was offered but £300k figure came out before hand by some means and even the press were speculating. It can only come from Taylor, his agent or loose lips at Rovers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Septic Peg Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, Esmond Million's Bung said: Premature ejacreaction is quite common I am led to believe. Not for me. Seeing as I am a woman... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, Hello said: it's undisclosed publicly what was offered but £300k figure came out before hand by some means and even the press were speculating. It can only come from Taylor, his agent or loose lips at Rovers So tell me exactly what City have done wrong then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 1 minute ago, Super said: So tell me exactly what City have done wrong then? Had the audacity to buy their player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Army 75 Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 Just now, Super said: So tell me exactly what City have done wrong then? Nothing . Not one thing. But those sad fuckers need someone to blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 3 minutes ago, Septic Peg said: Not for me. Seeing as I am a woman... Well that's not what Mrs Bung keeps telling me........................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Super said: So tell me exactly what City have done wrong then? Nothing and I have said as much elsewhere here. Whether someone leaked the figure deliberately or not, I don't blame City for taking advantage of something that was rumoured in public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BSRED Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 According to Andy Howard on Points West, City are "disappointed with the way Rovers dealt with the transfer in the early stages". Maybe a bit of tit for tat going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Septic Peg Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 Just now, Esmond Million's Bung said: Well that's not what Mrs Bung keeps telling me........................ Well if men have wombs and can produce children via their wee hole, then I'm a man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kodjias Wrist Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 This happens everywhere in the footballing world. Rovers as always being pathetic like they were with wycombe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1bristolcity Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 1 hour ago, lenred said: I'm quoting something that's on Gaschat! It's not my writing, I've copied it from their site. Evidently that's not clear. It is now, apologies, I was too quick off the mark mate....Len RED should have known, I feel dirty.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 2 hours ago, spudski said: I'm not so sure mate...I've heard Taylor has 'issues'. Well it's good to help homeless people . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted February 2, 2017 Admin Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 16 minutes ago, BSRED said: According to Andy Howard on Points West, City are "disappointed with the way Rovers dealt with the transfer in the early stages". Maybe a bit of tit for tat going on. Maybe trying to stall the deal so it didn't go through in time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3rich Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 I'd love to know the reasons why we were the only club to officially bid for him in the championship. Does make you wonder a little bit given he scores for fun and no one else has taken a punt..that being said I reckon he will do well with us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid in the Riot Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 17 minutes ago, BSRED said: According to Andy Howard on Points West, City are "disappointed with the way Rovers dealt with the transfer in the early stages". Maybe a bit of tit for tat going on. Well that's interesting because I heard that over the weekend Rovers actually rejected our bid of £300k and City had to get the lawyers involved to explain to Rovers that they could in fact not refuse a bid which triggered a release clause! That of course, if true, would suggest we were aware of there being a release clause! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 27 minutes ago, Hello said: it's undisclosed publicly what was offered but £300k figure came out before hand by some means and even the press were speculating. It can only come from Taylor, his agent or loose lips at Rovers As has been pointed out by other posters, the £300,000 release clause had been mentioned by ITK''s on Gaschat some time ago. That suggests that club officials were probably accidentally the source of the leak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Colby-Tit Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 From what I've read and heard it now seems blindingly obvious that City were the only club Taylor was interested in signing for, for whatever reason. Which makes is soooooo more painful for the blue few As an aside, why does every player called Matthew have to be referred to as Matty when playing for a Bristol club? Sounds a bit limp wristed to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 Hilarious. Hopefully the investigation will show them to be the bunch of bitter idiots they are making themselves look. I know who my money would be on in terms of which dealt with things in the most professional way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric04 Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 10 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said: Well that's interesting because I heard that over the weekend Rovers actually rejected our bid of £300k and City had to get the lawyers involved to explain to Rovers that they could in fact not refuse a bid which triggered a release clause! That of course, if true, would suggest we were aware of there being a release clause! And this, I can tell you, is the nub of the problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOTBLUE Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 As I have mentioned before I work with someone with good inside information at ******,and he said about the 300,000 release clause months ago,so pretty much common knowledge . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 34 minutes ago, BSRED said: According to Andy Howard on Points West, City are "disappointed with the way Rovers dealt with the transfer in the early stages". Maybe a bit of tit for tat going on. Seems they weaseled,wriggled & canived but of course legally their hands were tied.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langford Red Posted February 2, 2017 Report Share Posted February 2, 2017 GASH should think themselves lucky they got £300,000 Oxford wanted him and had contract ready I remember him saying he wanted to leave with the GASH getting something for him and not on bad terms How many City players have crossed to them? They would not let us have Hales and got bitter about it. £2m we offered them. And they still sold him for £2m straight away after I think he was very considerate to them Get a life GASH We ARE bigger than you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.