Judda Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Can you stop turning all threads about entirely different subjects into your way of putting digs in about them. I know you have a right to free speach but maybe stick to the millions of dedicated threads... Everytime I start reading a new interesting thread some SL or LJ haters turns it into a rant about them.... And FYI I also think LJ out but it's just a bit boring now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, Judda said: Can you stop turning all threads about entirely different subjects into your way of putting digs in about them. I know you have a right to free speach but maybe stick to the millions of dedicated threads... Everytime I start reading a new interesting thread some SL or LJ haters turns it into a rant about them.... And FYI I also think LJ out but it's just a bit boring now... This irony for breakfast is too delish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CotswoldRed Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Make your minds up. Yesterday a number were suggesting those against LJ had all gone quiet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Coach Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Johnson out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ploppy Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 There are some posters I've noticed, ones who are genuinely otherwise respected on the forum who literally don't post about anything else these days. I won't name names but it does get pretty tedious. We've played some brilliant stuff recently and it almost pains them to see it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Army 75 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Wonder what way this thread will go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoons Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Last few weeks been refreshing the amount of non LJ threads etc so not sure what the OP is doing here? Maybe he put thatchers on his cereal instead of milk ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, Judda said: Can you stop turning all threads about entirely different subjects into your way of putting digs in about them. I know you have a right to free speach but maybe stick to the millions of dedicated threads... Everytime I start reading a new interesting thread some SL or LJ haters turns it into a rant about them.... And FYI I also think LJ out but it's just a bit boring now... Banter denied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 I find any thread title that includes the word "haters" very unesseccary. No doubt that Junior has struggled at times this season and SL has supported him throughout those tough times but even the most vociferous critic of either them actually "hates" either of them. The word "critics" or even "moaners" is far more acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judda Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, Spoons said: Last few weeks been refreshing the amount of non LJ threads etc so not sure what the OP is doing here? Maybe he put thatchers on his cereal instead of milk ? It's not as bad as it was but still plenty going on.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judda Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, Robbored said: I find any thread title that includes the word "haters" very unesseccary. No doubt that Junior has struggled at times this season and SL has supported him throughout those tough times but even the most vociferous critic of either them actually "hates" either of them. The word "critics" or even "moaners" is far more acceptable. Judging from some of the venomous stuff I have read then haters is potentially an understatement! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1bristolcity Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Robbored said: I find any thread title that includes the word "haters" very unesseccary. No doubt that Junior has struggled at times this season and SL has supported him throughout those tough times but even the most vociferous critic of either them actually "hates" either of them. The word "critics" or even "moaners" is far more acceptable. And not calling him Jnr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Hunt-Hertz Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 13 minutes ago, Vincent Vega said: Banter denied. Pisstake embargo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pezo Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, Robbored said: I find any thread title that includes the word "haters" very unesseccary. No doubt that Junior has struggled at times this season and SL has supported him throughout those tough times but even the most vociferous critic of either them actually "hates" either of them. The word "critics" or even "moaners" is far more acceptable. I have noticed you call LJ junior at pretty much every opportunity, not having a dig but where did this come from? I have never seen anyone else call him that. Makes me think of Indiana Jones every time you write it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Hunt-Hertz Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, Pezo said: I have noticed you call LJ junior at pretty much every opportunity, not having a dig but where did this come from? I have never seen anyone else call him that. Makes me think of Indiana Jones every time you write it. To differentiate him from the Great Satan, obviously (you know, the one who got us promoted, and to a play off final) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Army 75 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, Pezo said: I have noticed you call LJ junior at pretty much every opportunity, not having a dig but where did this come from? I have never seen anyone else call him that. Makes me think of Indiana Jones every time you write it. Dr lansdown Dr lansdown. Booby trap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judda Posted April 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Pezo said: I have noticed you call LJ junior at pretty much every opportunity, not having a dig but where did this come from? I have never seen anyone else call him that. Makes me think of Indiana Jones every time you write it. Jnr is a bit patronising but not half as bad as all the personal slurs I've read (mostly height based) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Hunt-Hertz Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, Judda said: Jnr is a bit patronising but not half as bad as all the personal slurs I've read (mostly height based) I'm not dwarfist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColeCiderRed Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 HA.. It's like Fight Club. First rule of Fight Club is to never talk about Fight Club. I wonder how this thread will go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 20 minutes ago, Robbored said: I find any thread title that includes the word "haters" very unesseccary. No doubt that Junior has struggled at times this season and SL has supported him throughout those tough times but even the most vociferous critic of either them actually "hates" either of them. The word "critics" or even "moaners" is far more acceptable. Keep up with the English language. In the context of online discourse troll doesn't be mean a mythical creature just as hater doesn't mean someone who actually hates. Critics or moaners might be more acceptable to you but doesn't make them more apt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, 29AR said: Keep up with the English language. it doesn't mean a mythical creature just as hater doesn't mean someone who actually hates. Critics or moaners might be more acceptable to you If "haters" isn't a plural of "hate" then you and the op should enrol in some English classes..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1953 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 I bet all the serial moaners are struggling now. Shall we renew or not? What a dilemma. I honestly believe this year's near miss will cause lessons to be learned. And if not, no doubt Zola or Mowbray or some other big name will be able to come to the rescue. You know it makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 22 minutes ago, 1bristolcity said: And not calling him Jnr. So he's not Johnson Jnr? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, Robbored said: If "haters" isn't a plural of "hate" then you and the op should enrol in some English classes..... Words can have several meanings and take on meanings of their own in different contexts. It's really extremely simple. Saying online you are a fish does not mean you swim in water for prime example - one I expect you can comprehend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, 29AR said: Words can have several meanings and take on meanings of their own in different contexts. It's really extremely simple. Saying online you are a fish does not mean you swim in water for prime example - one I expect you can comprehend. "Fish" has different uses. "Hate" does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, Robbored said: "Fish" has different uses. "Hate" does not. Well, it does, it's just you who refuses to acknowledge it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Hunt-Hertz Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 7 minutes ago, Robbored said: If "haters" isn't a plural of "hate" then you and the op should enrol in some English classes..... How is it a plural of hate? Haters is a plural of hater. I agree that it's all a load of old bollocks, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Just now, Mike Hunt-Hertz said: How is it a plural of hate? Haters is a plural of hater. I agree that it's all a load of old bollocks, though. You're right. I was a bit pissed off when I posted earlier............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EstoniaTallinnRed Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 Hatred or hate is a deep and extreme emotional dislike. It can be directed against individuals, groups, entities, objects, behaviors, or ideas. Hatred is often associated with feelings of anger, disgust and a disposition towards hostility. I don't hate LJ, I just don't think he is the right man for the job, that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East End Old Boy Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 29 minutes ago, Mike Hunt-Hertz said: To differentiate him from the Great Satan, obviously (you know, the one who got us promoted, and to a play off final) And who liked to kick an occasional arse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.