Kingswoodactor Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 I don't like a loan player taking a place on the bench in place of one of our own. Especially as Hinds looks a real talent and I'd hate to see his development ruined. He should have come on in that game tonight, not Woodrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolas Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Bit hard if he wasnt on the bench though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswoodactor Posted August 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 1 minute ago, nickolas said: Bit hard if he wasnt on the bench though! This is exactly my point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolas Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 1 minute ago, Kingswoodactor said: This is exactly my point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalcub Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Such a strong bench with little lee scratching his head wondering what day it is !! Credit where it's due they played well but with the boss we could actually really progress ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loco Rojo Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 One game missed wont ruin his development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswoodactor Posted August 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 10 minutes ago, Loco Rojo said: One game missed wont ruin his development. Pretty sure we're not gonna see Hinds on the bench in place of Woodrow over the next few games unless there's an injury. His gametime is going to be limited now that Woodrow has signed, and that for me is extremely frustrating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cummins17 Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Come on let's be sensible, as much as I like to see our academy lads get a chance, we can not afford to put a young lad onbthe bench with no experience if we want to actually push on and progress this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_eastender Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, cummins17 said: Come on let's be sensible, as much as I like to see our academy lads get a chance, we can not afford to put a young lad onbthe bench with no experience if we want to actually push on and progress this season Why? Villa were playing 18 year old Davis who was Villa's most threatening player in 1st half and they have much bigger names than us that didn't get picked ahead of him. Hinds has shown against Plymuff & Watford, something that we don't have in any other player with exception of Joe Bryan - the ability to strike a good shot from outside the box. Well worth a place on the bench for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay mizel Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Hind's scores on the bounce and look's dangerous, he has to be in the fold over Woodrow. Who hasn't. And hasn't. Please Lee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 6 minutes ago, old_eastender said: Why? Villa were playing 18 year old Davis who was Villa's most threatening player in 1st half and they have much bigger names than us that didn't get picked ahead of him. Hinds has shown against Plymuff & Watford, something that we don't have in any other player with exception of Joe Bryan - the ability to strike a good shot from outside the box. Well worth a place on the bench for me. Since when did Bryan have an outstanding ability to strike a ball from outside the box? Not criticising your point, I just don't recall this ever being a feature of his game? As for Woodrow. Useless. Much like Diedhiou. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meh Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Judge Woodrow's attributes after he has had some game time 2 sub appearances at the end of tight games totalling about 25 minutes !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cummins17 Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, Harry said: Since when did Bryan have an outstanding ability to strike a ball from outside the box? Not criticising your point, I just don't recall this ever being a feature of his game? As for Woodrow. Useless. Much like Diedhiou. Against the gas When we last played, FC Twente pre season, Middlesbrough away a few years back. Just to name a few occasions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_eastender Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, Harry said: Since when did Bryan have an outstanding ability to strike a ball from outside the box? Not criticising your point, I just don't recall this ever being a feature of his game? As for Woodrow. Useless. Much like Diedhiou. Joe scored a peach from FK against Twente, hit the bar against Millwall too. Just doesn't often get into shooting positions playing at LB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aa_bcfc Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 It really frustrates me that we have a player Fulham don't want on the bench rather than OUR OWN players hinds and Taylor. I really think Hinds should have started instead of Diedhiou who for me had disappointed so far. I'm sure Terry and the other big centre back would rather play against Diedhiou than a young player who is confident and run at them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trueredsupporter Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, Harry said: Since when did Bryan have an outstanding ability to strike a ball from outside the box? Not criticising your point, I just don't recall this ever being a feature of his game? As for Woodrow. Useless. Much like Diedhiou. always been very able at shooting Joe like the free kick a few weeks ago. maybe wants to be more positive and shoot more often where it become a feature often.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid in the Riot Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Well said, young thespian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Hinds isn't an academy lad, we signed him in Jan for the development squad. Woodrow has a fee agreed for a perm so he's ours if we want him, he is four years older and has a lot more experience. If we'd had a second striker on the bench it should have been Taylor. I'd love to see Hinds carry on doing well but I think he should be going out on loan for this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron-Bcfc Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Woodrow's came on twice now and in both games we've lost all attacking outlet and started getting dominated. Don't think he's touched it more than 3 times across both appearances. Exactly what to expect from a Fulham reject I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordofthebling Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 People were calling for Fams to be subbed and as soon as he goes off the pressure is cranked up on us... would have loved to have seen Hinds given 10/15 when he brought on Elliason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswoodactor Posted August 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 12 minutes ago, Aaron-Bcfc said: Woodrow's came on twice now and in both games we've lost all attacking outlet and started getting dominated. Don't think he's touched it more than 3 times across both appearances. Exactly what to expect from a Fulham reject I suppose. This is what worries me. Fulham know a good player when they see one and they're a strong established Championship side. If Woodrow was good enough, he wouldn't be with us full stop. I'm not gonna get on the lad's back if it's not going well, but it was an odd loan signing IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelts Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Feel sorry for Heinz if I'm honest. No need for Fulhams rubbish to sit on our bench we have our own to do that . A little worried about Fammy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntstile Red Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 30 minutes ago, Harry said: Since when did Bryan have an outstanding ability to strike a ball from outside the box? Not criticising your point, I just don't recall this ever being a feature of his game? As for Woodrow. Useless. Much like Diedhiou. To be fair, watch his goal v Cardiff at home last year. A supreme effort that gets forgotten because we lost the game. The boy can hit the ball, I reckon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingswoodactor Posted August 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 5 minutes ago, shelts said: Feel sorry for Heinz if I'm honest. No need for Fulhams rubbish to sit on our bench we have our own to do that . A little worried about Fammy Mate don't be worried. I had a tin of their Sausage/Beans earlier and it went down a storm. All is well in that camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 Woodrow seems to be more of a defensive forward, in that he'll attempt to pressure defenders. I'm sure it didn't help that when he came on Bobby had practically dropped back into the midfield so was having to work alone upfront, doesn't seem like a lone striker. Seemed we were happy with a point with how we were playing so hard to blame him for not much happening upfront. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelts Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 3 minutes ago, Kingswoodactor said: Mate don't be worried. I had a tin of their Sausage/Beans earlier and it went down a storm. All is well in that camp. I've calmed down now!! Massive lover of their Spaghetti Bolognese in a tin!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelts Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 46 minutes ago, j mizel said: Hind's scores on the bounce and look's dangerous, he has to be in the fold over Woodrow. Who hasn't. And hasn't. Please Lee. Totally agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RT's Vaseline Tub Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 39 minutes ago, Neo said: Judge Woodrow's attributes after he has had some game time 2 sub appearances at the end of tight games totalling about 25 minutes !! He's no Matt Smith put it this way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 It's such an easy game. Select Hinds and we'd have exposed Terry's pace. We would've won easily. Why didn't Chelsea's opponents for 10-15 years just do what you're all suggesting, e.g. play two nippy strikers, Chelsea would've lost every game. Not saying Diedhiou was MOTM tonight, but I enjoyed his performance. He is getting through lots of unselfish (and unseen) work to allow the likes of Reid to benefit. It's a fledgling partnership, where Reid is getting the glory. Diedhiou takes the buffeting off of the CBs so Reid can play in the pockets. Remember Wilbs doing lots of unselfish stuff for Kodjia. Okay Wilbs didn't come with a £5m price-tag, but Diedhiou is no mug. Of course he'll be judged on his goal output (by us), but LJ will be judging him on other stuff too. Woodrow didn't do much when he came on, but we'd lost a bit of initiative at that point. There were some good performances tonight, a lot of hard graft too. Bodes well, even if we didn't get the result we just about deserved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 6 minutes ago, shelts said: Totally agree Totally disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.