AppyDAZE Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Robin Ashton said: I also seem to remember some pretty boring football under Wilson, and wasn't disappointed he left after that depressing play off final fiasco. True. I seem to remember him saying he was playing Joe Burnell to "break up" attacks. Unfortunately, he used to break up most of our own! Nope. He had 4 years in the third tier and didn't cut the mustard... Alan Dicks on the orher hand :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC_Dan Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Robin Ashton said: I also seem to remember some pretty boring football under Wilson, and wasn't disappointed he left after that depressing play off final fiasco. He once fielded a team containing 8 defenders: S Phillips, D Coles (L Lita, 69), T Butler, M Hill, C Fortune (B Tinnion, 25), S Murray, L Carey, J Burnell (S Clist, 43), M Bell, C Roberts, C Fagan OK so I'm pushing it a little calling Murray a defender but he did play right back quite a few times in 98/99. Even so, just look at that dynamic central midfield pairing of Burnell and Carey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl Visiting Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 He took us out of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 1 hour ago, BCFC_Dan said: He once fielded a team containing 8 defenders: S Phillips, D Coles (L Lita, 69), T Butler, M Hill, C Fortune (B Tinnion, 25), S Murray, L Carey, J Burnell (S Clist, 43), M Bell, C Roberts, C Fagan OK so I'm pushing it a little calling Murray a defender but he did play right back quite a few times in 98/99. Even so, just look at that dynamic central midfield pairing of Burnell and Carey. Lets not forget that City were a League 1 team under DW with a largely League 1 squad. He got the best out of limited resources. Who else was available to replace the likes of Clist and Burnell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OddBallJim Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 The football we played under Wilson is the best football any city team has played since 2000. Hard to say what could have happened had we kept him, but I think we can agree that sacking him without a superior appointment lined up was a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22A Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 32 minutes ago, Owl Visiting said: He took us out of it I seem to remember that even Sheffield's MP called for Wilson to be sacked as Owls' Manager. After we appointed him, a SW fan rang in to 606; "Bristol City; you are welcome to him"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl Visiting Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, 22A said: I seem to remember that even Sheffield's MP called for Wilson to be sacked as Owls' Manager. After we appointed him, a SW fan rang in to 606; "Bristol City; you are welcome to him"! Well remembered. Blunkett was one of em. I actually quite like Danny Wilson despite him taking us down, feels like he's managed every club in South Yorkshire. Was part of our 91 League Cup winning side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 Look at the stats - he was a good manager for us!http://www.managerstats.co.uk/clubs/bristol-city/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 35 minutes ago, Robbored said: Lets not forget that City were a League 1 team under DW with a largely League 1 squad. He got the best out of limited resources. Who else was available to replace the likes of Clist and Burnell? Limited resources! He spent £600k on Lee Peacock whilst we were in League One (an enormous sum then) and paired him up front with a bloke who had cost us a million pounds. Bet Colchester and Walsall (the sort of teams that he couldn't beat) had players on wages of less than a third of what his team was on. He spent a lot of money but in truth was ******* useless, we made more progress in 18 months under Cotterill and Gary Johnson than we did in four whole seasons under that clown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 10 minutes ago, GrahamC said: Limited resources! He spent £600k on Lee Peacock whilst we were in League One (an enormous sum then) and paired him up front with a bloke who had cost us a million pounds. Answer my question. Who would you have replaced Clist and Burnell with? They were even worse than LJ. So yeah, limited resources Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triumphant return of TG Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 Wilson did alright with what he had to work with. When you think of how many of his squad had come through the academy, none of whom went on to big and better things bar Hill and possibly Doherty. For the likes of Coles, Burnell, Clist, Phillips, Carey, Brown, Amankwaah, Fortune, other Brown, and players we bought in like Murray, Matthews, Roberts. This was the peak of their careers. As usual, there was always money for forwards, but not for the defenders that the team was crying out for. 15 years later and that is still the case, every season. Doing alright, however, doesn't get you promoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS15_RED Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 I enjoyed the Wilson era, lots of academy players, some great attacking football and winning the LDV at the Millenium Stadium was fantastic. However, when it came to the crunch, he couldn't quite take us on to the next level. He went on to do exactly the same at both Swindle and Sheffield United. So no, no chance he would of taken us to the Prem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorenzos Only Goal Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 21 hours ago, tinman85 said: Was watching some old videos of the Wilson era. We were so good to watch back then. Certainly more entertaining than the GJ team. How on earth did we not go up? We were a Graham Kavanagh and Peter Thorne/Earnsahw away from it. Frustrating we didn't push the boat out for that type of established player. Had me thinking that if we had beaten Brighton at Wembley would Danny have progressed us at Champ level? Your menthol you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 2 hours ago, Robbored said: Answer my question. Who would you have replaced Clist and Burnell with? They were even worse than LJ. So yeah, limited resources If I had a million pound striker I'd have paired him with someone costing £250k and spent the other £350k on a midfielder. Otherwise I'd have paired Tinnion and Doherty in the middle and played Aaron Brown wide left. Wilson was probably too busy getting the beers in, or getting that player who was so drunk that he fell asleep in a ditch to try to sober up.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pezo Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 I think its pretty much been said on here aleady but - talented squad, good football, unfortunately masked the fact we weren't becoming a professional outfit as the world was changing around us while us fans all wondered why our talented players weren't able to get us promoted. DW couldnt change with the times and wasnt going to get us promoted from the 3rd tier let alone the 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhistleHappy Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 13 hours ago, Robbored said: I know Tom. I used to see City players in the Sawyers Arms in Nailsea. Scot Murray was banned because of his profane language which got worse the more pissed he got. I saw Peacock fall off the bar stool......I could tell you loads of stories. Profane? ..... is that a posh way of saying inebriated Scottish?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 6 minutes ago, WhistleHappy said: Profane? ..... is that a posh way of saying inebriated Scottish?? i can't get past the ******* swear filter...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted September 12, 2017 Report Share Posted September 12, 2017 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Rollason Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 Premier Inn maybe.... for a cheeky pint... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.