Jump to content

Welcome to One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums

Welcome to One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums by signing in or creating an account.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Full access to all forums (not all viewable as guest)
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Support OTIB with a premium membership

Septic Peg

OOC Summer 2018

Recommended Posts

Who's OOC this summer? 

Obv one is Gaz O'Neil. We know both Flinty and Pack are on long contracts and relative newbies such as Taylor, Fam, Đurić etc should be ok too.

But what lengths are left for everyone else? Should we be tying down Bobby or Joe? Did COD, Browny or Patto sign two years only?

Mildly concerned that if we don't start tying some down where needed, we'll be in the shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Septic Peg said:

Who's OOC this summer? 

Obv one is Gaz O'Neil. We know both Flinty and Pack are on long contracts and relative newbies such as Taylor, Fam, Đurić etc should be ok too.

But what lengths are left for everyone else? Should we be tying down Bobby or Joe? Did COD, Browny or Patto sign two years only?

Mildly concerned that if we don't start tying some down where needed, we'll be in the shit.

As far as I know the following are OOC in the summer of 2018, in addition to Gary O'Neil...

Bobby Reid - but an option of a further year has been built in

Marlon Pack - but an option of a further year has been built in

Luke Steele - but an option of a further year has been built in

Josh Brownhill

Frank Fielding 

Ivan Lucic

Zak Vyner

Max O'Leary

 

 

 

Edited by BS4 on Tour...
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

O'Leary also has an option for another year, and Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. The one that's troubling me the most is Brownhill. Iirc Stockhausen said we were in contract talks with him over the summer when there was speculation about him joining a prem team and we haven't heard anything since. Really hope we tie him down for long term. I think they should all get new deals apart from Golbourne. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, EmersonsRed said:

Joe has all but signed a new deal anyway

That's a bit like being ' all but pregnant ' , you either are or you're not . 

He's either signed or he hasn't. Whatever his motivation is right now until the contract is signed it doesn't mean diddly squat .

I trust the club these days to get it right more often than not .

Edited by Major Isewater
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Major Isewater said:

That's a bit like being ' all but pregnant ' , you either are or you're not . 

He's either signed or he hasn't. Whatever his motivation is right now until the contract is signed it doesn't mean diddly squat .

I trust the club these days to get it right more often than not .

Can't sign a contract you haven't been offered. Can verbally agree to sign one when it's offered at the end of the season though.

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, WRERE said:

 Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. Really hope we tie him down 

The fact that Golbourne is out on loan suggests that he's not in LJs plans. I'm sure Scott is aware of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, JasonM88 said:

Johnson said earlier this season that Brownhill has more than a year left, despite general belief. 

Is that with the option? So technically does expire this summer just if we haven't applied the extension yet. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, EmersonsRed said:

Can't sign a contract you haven't been offered. Can verbally agree to sign one when it's offered at the end of the season though.

 

:)

As they say a verbal agreement is not worth the paper it's written on. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Robbored said:

The fact that Golbourne is out on loan suggests that he's not in LJs plans. I'm sure Scott is aware of that.

The poster had moved on to talking about Josh Brownhill by that second comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Spoons said:

I think the club know what they are doing! Calm down dear ! 

As things stand I'll accept your comment for the time being. My issue is that to many players are on to long contracts costing us a fortune.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Septic Peg said:

Who's OOC this summer? 

Obv one is Gaz O'Neil. We know both Flinty and Pack are on long contracts and relative newbies such as Taylor, Fam, Đurić etc should be ok too.

But what lengths are left for everyone else? Should we be tying down Bobby or Joe? Did COD, Browny or Patto sign two years only?

Mildly concerned that if we don't start tying some down where needed, we'll be in the shit.

Give them all 10 years. What could possibly go wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said:

The poster had moved on to talking about Josh Brownhill by that second comment.

and your point is?.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, JasonM88 said:

Johnson said earlier this season that Brownhill has more than a year left, despite general belief. 

You mean to say the Manager knows more about the club than certain Forum Members (claim to) do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said:

My point is that you misleadingly quoted @WRERE's post to make it look like it said Golbourne should be "tied down". It did not say that. You then appeared to respond to that suggestion.

What an odd thing to do - trying to fathom why you would do that @Robbored? A senior moment? If not.. why?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said:

My point is that you misleadingly quoted @WRERE's post to make it look like it said Golbourne should be "tied down". It did not say that. You then appeared to respond to that suggestion.

You're imagining stuff that's not there VD.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Robbored said:

You're imagining stuff that's not there VD.

Um no. @Robbored, I'm really not. You are misleadingly quoting the original posting by @WRERE

Check @WRERE's post:

19 hours ago, WRERE said:

O'Leary also has an option for another year, and Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. The one that's troubling me the most is Brownhill. Iirc Stockhausen said we were in contract talks with him over the summer when there was speculation about him joining a prem team and we haven't heard anything since. Really hope we tie him down for long term. I think they should all get new deals apart from Golbourne. 

Then you, @Robbored, quoted parts of it such that it read as:

19 hours ago, WRERE said:

Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. Really hope we tie him down

You, @Robbored, actively chose to remove something from the start of @WRERE's quote, a bit in the middle and a bit at the end. 

Since you're in denial, @Robbored, and struggle to accept you are wrong, I helpfully highlight in bold the parts of @WRERE's quote you quoted.

19 hours ago, WRERE said:

O'Leary also has an option for another year, and Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. The one that's troubling me the most is Brownhill. Iirc Stockhausen said we were in contract talks with him over the summer when there was speculation about him joining a prem team and we haven't heard anything since. Really hope we tie him down for long term. I think they should all get new deals apart from Golbourne. 

That is somewhat odd behaviour.  You, @Robbored, then appeared to dismiss such a possibility of Scott Golbourne being "tied down" despite the last few words of @WRERE's actual posting.

Hence, @Robbored, I think you will find that my imagination was not involved in any part. You misleadingly quoted a poster and have lied upon being called out on it. That reflects more on you than it does me.

Edited by View from the Dolman
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, WRERE said:

O'Leary also has an option for another year, and Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. The one that's troubling me the most is Brownhill. Iirc Stockhausen said we were in contract talks with him over the summer when there was speculation about him joining a prem team and we haven't heard anything since. Really hope we tie him down for long term. I think they should all get new deals apart from Golbourne. 

Quote

Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. Really hope we tie him down 

The original quote is above - you replied to it BUT you doctored it to make it read the second quote below. 

I've put in bold the parts you chose to reply to (which are totally unrelated) so you can see how you've destroyed the full context and made up a point to reply to at random.

Did you just get it wrong? Or what?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said:

Check @WRERE's post:

Hence, @Robbored, I think you will find that my imagination was not involved in any part. You misleadingly quoted a poster and have lied upon being called out on it. That reflects more on you than it does me.

I'll hold my hands up here....

I just checked the post I question and I actually "doctored" it incorrectly. I've only just realised that. You were right to highlight my error.

The point I was making still stands tho. With SG allowed to go out on loan strongly suggests that he's not it LJs plans this or any future seasons.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Robbored said:

I'll hold my hands up here....

I just checked the post I question and I actually "doctored" it incorrectly. I've only just realised that. You were right to highlight my error.

The point I was making still stands tho. With SG allowed to go out on loan strongly suggests that he's not it LJs plans this or any future seasons.

Everyone was fully aware of that though I think..

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Phileas Fogg said:

Everyone was fully aware of that though I think..

You'd have thought so but this is otib.........it's easy enough to overestimate the posters savvy.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×