View from the Dolman Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfOfWestStreet Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmite Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Didn't see that coming!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Oh dear.. wasn't aware this was going on. Big problem for tomorrow especially if Baker is out. Fully fit choice from Bryan, Flint, Magnússon, Kelly and Vyner I make that? I reckon he'll definitely risk Baker if he can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted November 3, 2017 Admin Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Blimey the FA dinosaurs are on fire again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sh1t_ref_again Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 A lot will depend on if Pisano is fit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View from the Dolman Posted November 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Club response: https://www.bcfc.co.uk/news/bristol-city-fc-statement-bailey-wright/ Fair to say that Mark Ashton has come out fighting with that statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said: Club response: https://www.bcfc.co.uk/news/bristol-city-fc-statement-bailey-wright/ No big fan of Mark Ashton but that statement is 100% spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted November 3, 2017 Admin Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Question is if the ref DIDN'T see any contact etc, WHY did he send the player off? Surely the ref has to see an incident and not just ASSUME the player has done wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, Phileas Fogg said: Oh dear.. wasn't aware this was going on. Big problem for tomorrow especially if Baker is out. Fully fit choice from Bryan, Flint, Magnússon, Kelly and Vyner I make that? I reckon he'll definitely risk Baker if he can. Brownhill could play at RB or even Korey but neither ideal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 4 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said: Club response: https://www.bcfc.co.uk/news/bristol-city-fc-statement-bailey-wright/ Fair to say that Mark Ashton has come out fighting with that statement. "the club and Bailey maintained that there was no simulation by the Bailey" Pleasantly surprised by that nickname, bit better than Wrighty or Bails Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfOfWestStreet Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said: Club response: https://www.bcfc.co.uk/news/bristol-city-fc-statement-bailey-wright/ Fair to say that Mark Ashton has come out fighting with that statement. Fair play to him he's not held back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hinsleburg Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 The club seem baffled by this which is never good as they wouldn’t be prepared for it? Would be interesting to see if they release the video evidence used to decide this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Tomarse said: Brownhill could play at RB or even Korey but neither ideal. True, forgot about that. I wouldn't feel that confident with a defence of Bryan, Magnússon, Flint and Vyner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shtanley Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Bryan Magnússon Flint Vyner Presumably our strongest option? I think I’d prefer Brownhill in CM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Shtanley said: Bryan Magnússon Flint Vyner Presumably our strongest option? I think I’d prefer Brownhill in CM. Looks vulnerable. I feel Flint plays far better with Wright and Baker. He'd have to be constantly watching and organising Magnússon and Vyner which doesn't help his game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hinsleburg Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, Tomarse said: Ridiculous decision! Who the **** decides these things!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elhombrecito Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Tomarse said: Wow. Not only can I see no way how the red card can be overturned based on that video, how the hell can they call that simulation? Honestly dumbfounded by this decision. Right stitch up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidercity1987 Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Hahaha just play him Johnson **** the FA, **** Warnock, **** Fulham Forza BCFC Wade Elliot gate all over again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 10 minutes ago, Phileas Fogg said: Oh dear.. wasn't aware this was going on. Big problem for tomorrow especially if Baker is out. Fully fit choice from Bryan, Flint, Magnússon, Kelly and Vyner I make that? I reckon he'll definitely risk Baker if he can. I hope this hasnt changed anything. Baker should only play if fully fit we dont want to risk him missing more than one game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchay Red Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, Tomarse said: How is that not an off the ball incident requiring discipline from the Ref? Farcical decision by the "independent panel" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilli74 Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 he didn't even put up a fight that he'd been sent off.... he knew what he did and accepted the Refs decision without even remotely contesting it ... massive admission of guilt in itself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellfire Corner Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 7 minutes ago, phantom said: Question is if the ref DIDN'T see any contact etc, WHY did he send the player off? Surely the ref has to see an incident and not just ASSUME the player has done wrong? It wasn’t the ref who saw it. He consulted his assistant on the far side of the field who had come onto the pitch. They talked for at least half a minute, then the referee produced the red card. It certainly seemed that the assistant had seen something that deserved a red card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Red Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 I'd love to know who the panel were? Shambles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidercity1987 Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 How many deliberate deceptions are Cardiff going to get away with tomorrow?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyhutchscurlymullet Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 The whole rule is wrong. Just because the fa think the ref made a bad decision (rightly or wrongly) they now ban Wright. If the ref had just booked kamara, neither player would have been suspended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 I've now seen two players given suspensions on this basis both have been bullshit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, phantom said: Question is if the ref DIDN'T see any contact etc, WHY did he send the player off? Surely the ref has to see an incident and not just ASSUME the player has done wrong? Absolutely this!! Why the hell did the Ref (or assistants) order the Red card, IF they saw now contact?! The radio commentators immediately said that the player had raised his hands to Bailey’s face. That’s a Red card. Slightly disappointing IF Wright has exaggerated a slight tap to the face, but nothing in the rules states the level of contact needed. It’s also off the ball. The highlights didn’t show it, so what footage to they have that categorically confirms that there was no contact, or intent to make contact..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snufflelufagus Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 4 minutes ago, hinsleburg said: Ridiculous decision! Who the **** decides these things!? The panel must have been made up of Neil Warnock, Tomlin, Anthony Joshua and Darrell Clark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.