tinman85 Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 First fine tonight. I wonder what the fee is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazelboy Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Don’t care. Wasn’t right to bring him on tonight, might play next week and win us the game, money well spent if that happens! He strengthens the squad and if you want to push towards the premier league that’s what you need! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P'head Red Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Pretty sure there wouldn't be a fee per game he doesn't play, but a fine if we don't play him in a certain amount of games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Could be a deal where Liverpool pay his wages per week when he plays and we pay his wages when he doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tully Bascomb Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, tinman85 said: First fine tonight. I wonder what the fee is. Is your first name Steve or Keith. If not what's it got to do with you stirrer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanterne Rouge Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Does it really matter? He wouldn`t have suited tonight`s game and City have obviously taken the view that if there are costs involved we`ll pay them if we don`t want toplay him in a particular game. All fine with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View from the Dolman Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 6 minutes ago, tinman85 said: First fine tonight. I wonder what the fee is. Unsubstantiated guff. If it's similar to the deal Cardiff have for Marko Grujic, there is a cost of £0 fully attributable to this evening's team selection since that's looked at across the entire loan period. But that doesn't suit your mentality. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42744447 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted January 19, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 minute ago, View from the Dolman said: Unsubstantiated guff. If it's similar to the deal Cardiff have for Marko Grujic, there is a cost of £0 fully attributable to this evening's team selection since that's looked at across the entire loan period. But that doesn't suit your mentality. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42744447 Not having a go. Just generally interested. Some people take things the wrong way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, tinman85 said: Not having a go. Just generally interested. Some people take things the wrong way. First time for everything I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledAjax Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Believe it’s a case of we pay Y amount of wages if he plays N number of games and we pay X amount of wages if he plays fewer than N number of games. So no stress. Plus I’m sure the “penalty” has been deemed financially acceptable and affordable should he play fewer than N games. Club won’t go to the financial wire if we don’t play Kent every week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RED4LIFE Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 25 minutes ago, tinman85 said: Not having a go. Just generally interested. Some people take things the wrong way. Take things the wrong way? You categorically stated in the OP we are getting fined for not playing RK and several posters have pointed out that is probably not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 minute ago, RED4LIFE said: Take things the wrong way? You categorically stated in the OP we are getting fined for not playing RK and several posters have pointed out that is probably not the case. Anyone would think he was hoping we were fined.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RED4LIFE Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Phileas Fogg said: Anyone would think he was hoping we were fined.. If he was a 'name' and on £40k a week this thread wouldn't be here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deadratinmycider Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Away at 2nd in the league trying to halt a run of defeats. Do you bring on an attacking winger who lacks defensive nous? No, end of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted January 19, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 11 minutes ago, RED4LIFE said: If he was a 'name' and on £40k a week this thread wouldn't be here. I just don't have the words to express how much I like this post!. Simple question don't expect pelters. See ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRoss Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 23 minutes ago, tinman85 said: I just don't have the words to express how much I like this post!. Simple question don't expect pelters. See ya I think people on here are suspicious of your constant negativity. You say you're just asking simple questions but implying much more. It doesn't matter because I think most people on here can see through it.. Especially as your also constantly wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC J Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 He's nowhere near the fitness required yet I've been told, the management aren't impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 4 hours ago, tinman85 said: First fine tonight. I wonder what the fee is. Your posts recently have been ******* awful..! Give it a rest or think before you post. You used to contribute quite well. Have you had your account hacked by a moron..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 3 hours ago, BCFC J said: He's nowhere near the fitness required yet I've been told, the management aren't impressed. Interesting.Could partially be the reason he doesn't track back/fill in so well at times-legs................reliable source?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 4 hours ago, BCFC J said: He's nowhere near the fitness required yet I've been told, the management aren't impressed. Well the management shouldn't have signed him if that's the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive user Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 8 hours ago, tinman85 said: Not having a go. Just generally interested. Some people take things the wrong way. Don't upset the clique here or you'll be marked out for life. Folks really don't like it when people ask difficult questions or dare to swim against the tide. It's a local forum for local people... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive user Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, Rednwhiterob said: Don't upset the clique here or you'll be marked out for life. Folks really don't like it when people ask difficult questions or dare to swim against the tide. OTIB - It's a local forum for local people... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolskRed Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 8 hours ago, tinman85 said: First fine tonight. I wonder what the fee is. Don’t worry yourself about it, heard a rumour Steve Lansdown is quite good when it comes to money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 20 minutes ago, Rednwhiterob said: Don't upset the clique here or you'll be marked out for life. Folks really don't like it when people ask difficult questions or dare to swim against the tide. It's a local forum for local people... No Rob. It’s not due to that. It’s consistently bad posts from Tinman for a long time. By bad posts I mean constant exaggerated melodramatic negativity, loaded questions such as the one in this thread and just a clear lack of understanding about our transfer policy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 2 hours ago, Phileas Fogg said: No Rob. It’s not due to that. It’s consistently bad posts about the same things from Tinman for a long time. By bad posts I mean constant exaggerated melodramatic negativity, loaded questions such as the one in this thread and just a clear lack of understanding about our transfer policy. Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 2 hours ago, Phileas Fogg said: No Rob. It’s not due to that. It’s consistently bad posts from Tinman for a long time. By bad posts I mean constant exaggerated melodramatic negativity, loaded questions such as the one in this thread and just a clear lack of understanding about our transfer policy. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted January 20, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 3 hours ago, Phileas Fogg said: No Rob. It’s not due to that. It’s consistently bad posts from Tinman for a long time. By bad posts I mean constant exaggerated melodramatic negativity, loaded questions such as the one in this thread and just a clear lack of understanding about our transfer policy. Bad posts? This is a forum. A forum for opinions. Not for clapping everything we do. Always strive to do better. Never settle for second best. That's my mandate for life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted January 20, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 3 hours ago, Phileas Fogg said: No Rob. It’s not due to that. It’s consistently bad posts from Tinman for a long time. By bad posts I mean constant exaggerated melodramatic negativity, loaded questions such as the one in this thread and just a clear lack of understanding about our transfer policy. Lack of clear understanding??? I simply want to know how much we are paying for him not playing! Nobody seems to have answered. Nixon says it is fortunes. Happy to meet away from the keyboard at the sports bar for a face to face chat. I'm sure we will get on very well. I'm a great guy. I'll even pay for the drinks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted January 20, 2018 Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 1 minute ago, tinman85 said: Bad posts? This is a forum. A forum for opinions. Not for clapping everything we do. Always strive to do better. Never settle for second best. That's my mandate for life. Ok I apologise, you’re right - perhaps a bit harsher than I intended. What I mean really is that I find myself disagreeing with almost all your posts but do find the loaded questions (such as this thread) a bit irritating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted January 20, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 20, 2018 1 minute ago, Phileas Fogg said: Ok I apologise, you’re right - perhaps a bit harsher than I intended. What I mean really is that I find myself disagreeing with almost all your posts but do find the loaded questions (such as this thread) a bit irritating. Yes but I equally disagree with you and a lot of others. If we all ate pizza every day life would be boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.