Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/29/21 in all areas

  1. Thank you. You've obviously cottoned onto the fact that I don't always digest information first time around. ??
    10 points
  2. Before the advent of body worn video, these cases very rarely made it to court( still seldom now). Without knowing the full details of the case of course, that will come out later. What is known, and captured evidentially is:- The call to the Police was made by Mrs B, asking Police to turn up and remove him from the address. She may have made disclosures about what has happened. When the officers have turned up, she has injuries, and the people present would have probably spoken about what has happened. This is captured on the video. It appears that Barton was arrested at the location (quoted arrested on the same day). So there was obviously a necessity for the officers to make that arrest at that point. She, obviously doesn't want to make a complaint; and the other witnesses don't want to get involved. Probably as they know he's already got a court case hanging over him already. In some ways this is similiar to the Caroline Flack case. In that the boyfriend had injuries, and probably said what had happened. But didn't want her arrested/charged. Ultimately, it's a question of positive action by the Police on that day. @Fordy62 and i have been involved in too many cases; where in the past the Police have walked away as no complaint. Only to be called back later to the same address to deal with something far more serious. Police officers would be done by the IOPC for such actions nowadays. The CPS have a massive backlog of cases, and will only take to court; the cases where they feel the evidence is strong enough for a realistic prospect of conviction (his bad character also plays a big part here). I think if she had made a complaint, he wouldn't have got bail, as he's already on Crown court bail for the other assault matter. Whatever happens with these victimless cases. It at least highlights the violent nature of the defendant concerned. It won't help him that it's in front of a magistrates (aka no jury) either. They see these incidents day in,day out; and generally see through the legal nonsense put up by defence counsels.
    6 points
  3. Had a similar problem this morning
    4 points
  4. This poll amused me. I'm thinking: Of the 115 who voted yes, 15 have season tickets and the other hundred get passed season tickets over the fence Of the 46 who voted no, 45 would never go to games anyway Of the 13 who were undecided, 10 want an excuse to go and support the City instead 25,000 were locked outside of the poll
    4 points
  5. 1. I genuinely don’t know if it was a crass error or some form of deliberate attempt to undermine things. They said they were quoting the prosecutor, but that’d require someone from the club to have been present at the hearing - surely they just haven’t taken Barton’s word for it? The only time you ever hear “victimless crime” tends to be either shoplifting from a larger retailer - but this isn’t a policing term because obviously it’s not true, or possibly simple possession of drugs. Either way, at best it’s wholly negligent and at worst it’s an evil attempt and undermining the judicial process. 2. The police obviously bailed him the day after the offence. This would have been most likely because on the day they didn’t have sufficient evidence to change. When he returned on bail (or released pending investigation - which is very similar), they charged him. Now, because they initially released him and because he presumably behaved himself while on said bail (for this offence), it makes it 100x more difficult to then remand at a later time. This most recent charge is at the lowest end of the scale and magistrates are under immense pressure not to remand prisoners - overcrowding of prisons and cost of remand - that it was never likely he’d be remanded for a low level assault. Remands tend to get reserved for higher level assaults or for people who are much more likely to abscond/offend on bail/interfere with justice. If he were to commit another assault id say remand chances would increase ten fold.
    4 points
  6. Driving across Bodmin Moor this morning I got stuck behind a load of hobby cyclists swerving all over the road and not giving way. Imagine my surprise when I saw that two of them were bedecked in Da Famuzzzz Quarters. I was ******* tempted to put them in the ditch it has to be said but just stuck to shouting `gashead *******` out of my window as I passed them. Brightened up a dull working day if nothing else.
    3 points
  7. Might have JUST kept us in with a bit of interest !
    3 points
  8. Done. Bristol United against Domestic Abuse.
    3 points
  9. I think @Fordy62 has covered the bail aspect. In some ways, Mrs B not supporting hasn't helped him on this matter. She has injuries(head injury, bloody nose). If she had seen a doctor, or allowed them to be documented evidentially; then it probably would have been a S47 ABH (actual bodily harm). That is an either way offence (ie can be heard in Crown or magistrates, at the discretion of the defence). Because of her position. He was charged with a Common assault by beating (Battery), as the nature of the injuries can't be ascertained. This is a summary only offence (Magistrates only). As i said in the original post, i can see a DJ (District judge sitting in on it). Lynne Matthews is the main one in Bristol, and she, like others nationwide doesn't suffer fools ( check out her rioters comments). The aspect of libel is still relevant regardless, of the nature of the Court. People posting on this, need to be careful; and to double check that they are either quoting a media piece, or something that has been published already. Mods will probably have to keep an eye on this topic unfortunately.
    3 points
  10. At the time, Danny Simpson’s ex made a statement that the charity didn’t reach out to her to discuss the situation (I don’t know if she contacted them). It made me think that the charity weren’t interested in reconciliation and resolution of the situation, only retribution. They didn’t care about his child.
    3 points
  11. Great result Glos and another cracking game in the 50 over competition. It really is one of the great formats and no surprise that Somerset are about to sell out for their next match. You need to defend, you need big hitters, you need to be accurate bowling over 10 overs, it’s all done in one day, oh and we’re world champions at it! Remind me again why it’s been relegated to a 2nd XI
    2 points
  12. Great decision not to run on the 1st ball of that over. Seemed to be a few Glos fans in the crowd. I really thought the game was up with 5 overs to go. Good to see Bracey get 90 in 72.
    2 points
  13. Glos needed 16 from the last over to beat Durham. Jack Taylor says "hold my beer"
    2 points
  14. Goodnight Irene - Eric clapton (bit of a reference to Simple Minds, too...........)
    2 points
  15. Good to keep reminding of the link
    2 points
  16. Shambles doesn't even begin to cover it. Yet the 6th richest club in the country, with a top manager (©J Barton), finished below Swindon!
    2 points
  17. I would doubt very much that the club’s legal advisor saw the statement before it was published as, in addition to the ‘victimless crime’ wording, the statement even referred to the matter as being ‘sub judicial’, when the correct term is, of course, sub judice.
    2 points
  18. I’d imagine that if the dinner guests were the owners of Derby and Sheff Weds that they’d, in all likelihood, be looking at a deal to sell their dinners back to the restaurant for about £30m each!
    2 points
  19. Just had a look ?. Posters quitting, posters getting banned, mod getting told to quit. All very strange and very needy One thing Joey Barton has done has definitely split their small fanbase . Couple of early defeats for the fewers it will be time to break the popcorn out.
    2 points
  20. Been meaning to return to this thread for a while, but have not. Few quick updates. Derby County Still nothing at CH for the Club, Sevco 5112 Limited, Gellaw Newco 203 Limited, DCFC Academy Limited, DCFC, Club DCFC Limited and Stadia DCFC Limited. It does seem that they can sign some players under EFL conditions though, maybe 4 or 5- or read Nixon said 4 plus Davies, perhaps they're trying to swing it in his case as a player coach- still showing as under Embargo for 4 reasons at EFL, 3 x Accounts and 1 x HMRC- one reporter suggested movement on that this week which may ease Embargo a bit more...shouldn't ease it much given no Accounts! No Confirmation Statements for 2021 either for Sevco 5112 Limited- and 2020 in their case- Gellaw Newco 203 Limited, DCFC Academy Limited, Club DCFC Limited and Stadia DCFC Limited- Club one isn't due until November. The conditions remain similar I assume, ie wage limits, no transfer fees etc. Reading FC Seemingly they can now sign players, on a higher wage than Derby but unsure how many. This could be like the Birmingham scenario of 2018 whereby they could sign up to 6 players under EFL Restrictions but were Charged with failure to 2018 and put under a Business Plan for 2 years...sold Olise for £8m, Aluko and Baldock left, but it's not enough! New sponsors at Madejski Stadium but again not enough...and you can't backdate of course! Richards went, Nevers went- some compensation but won't be huge. Not even been able to sign free agents up to now and it clearly states on the EFL Embargo Reporting Service, that they are under Embargo for "Breach of Profit and Sustainability Rules". Puscas could also leave on loan, there is interest anyway. Stoke City This is an interesting one. They caused a bit of a stir given the significant Impairment of Player Registrations but the Profits made have been minimal and perhaps non-existent. It could be argued that this justified their Impairment as they could not make the necessary downsizing without, or it could be argued that the players had more takers than they (Stoke) believed in the last 12 months! Selling Collins an academy Product for £12-12.5m to Burnley surely helped a lot and may have given them some breathing space to help to restructure responsibly- unclear if they have 'sold' any Fixed Assets or not- in particular the Stadium. Anyway, the Ins: Bonham- Free, Gillingham (GK) Wilmot- £1.5-2.5m, Watford (CB) Vrancic- Free, Norwich (CM) The Outs: Bauer- Undisclosed, UFA (RB) Collins- £12-12.5m, Burnley (CB) Wimmer- Free, Rapid Vienna (CB) Lindsay- Undisclosed, Preston (CB) Martins Indi- Undisclosed, AZ Alkmaar (CB/LB) Woods- Free, Birmingham (CM) Mikel- Free, Kuwait SC (CM) Cousins- Free- Wigan (CM) NDiaye- Free- Aris Thessaloniki (CM) Sorensen- Undisclosed- Lincoln (CM) Vokes- Undisclosed- Wycombe (CF) Loans Out: Etebo- Watford (CM/AM) Afobe- Millwall (CF) Feeling Tom Edwards might still be on loan at an MLS club too. Plus a clutch of younger players either loaned out or released. Not really counting them much though. Gunn was on a pretty much season long loan from Southampton. Norrington-Davies half-season from Sheffield United Matondo half-season from Schalke. Clarke half-season from Tottenham. All returned, not replaced. Now a number of these, perhaps a decent number were already on loan in 2020/21 and before in some cases, so in some ways Stoke haven't lost too much, but otoh it's an impressive offloading! Can't even say it's all part of a Covid plan either as attempted downsizing began in January 2020 and perhaps before at times in Summer 2019- think their plan was that without Covid they would loan out and loan out...and sell in final year of deal. EFL certainly need to investigate, add back any excess Profit made this season on any Impaired in 2019/20 to those joint figures and significantly assess this but also in fairness, the offloading has been significant.
    2 points
  21. Just finished watching Glos with a last over win against Durham and Scarborough. Cracking innings from Jack Taylor to finish the match, 49 from 29 balls. Well done lads!
    1 point
  22. Oh Shit - The Buzzcocks
    1 point
  23. That's kinda my point. Let's say 10 people test positive just before a match. 3 of them might be the screw you variety. But if the other 7 decide to do the right thing to protect others then that's 7 mitigated opportunities that the virus could have spread in. As for the tickets, that's why I suggested that the league need to take the initiative on this and remove their restriction to stream in the UK on a Saturday so that those who have a ticket and do test positive but may be sitting on the fence of what to do then they may be incentivised to stay away by not missing the match itself.
    1 point
  24. Not totally pointless. Only pointless for those that don't want to do the right thing. I would like to think that most people who test positive would do the right thing and stay away, so there is a point to them. It would need the EFL to make a change, but an incentive for honesty would possibly be that if you test positive and have a ticket for a match then you're offered a streaming pass for it. Possibly would reduce the temptation to report a positive result as negative.
    1 point
  25. Just a little insight into what we had to put up with under power Special report: The ‘complete and utter shambles’ of Swindon Town Stuart James, Matt Slater and more It is hard to know where to start with Swindon Town, but the story about the players taking their own warm-up while listening to the public address system in the hope that they might find out the team that way feels like as good a place as any. Swindon were not just sleepwalking towards relegation last season, they were sliding out of League One in the most shambolic fashion possible. “The only time I’d seen preparations like it was Sunday League when you’re walking your dog in the park,” one of the players told The Athletic. The money at the club had dried up to such an extent that they ran low on bandages and tape in the medical room. Some players ended up offering to cover the cost of their own MRI scans, while GPS vests were discarded because nobody knew how to download the data after the strength and conditioning coach left. Even making up post-match protein shakes became a problem. A proud football club that won the League Cup in 1969 and spent a season in the Premier League in 1993-94 had descended into farce or, as another player puts it, become “a bit of a laughing stock”. In the midst of a relegation battle, a player claims they found out the line-up for one match 10 minutes before kick-off when names were scribbled on a board. So much of what has taken place at Swindon in recent times has been shrouded in mystery, right down to the club’s ownership. Lee Power transferred his shares to the Australian businessman Clem Morfuni last week, bringing to an end his tumultuous eight-year reign as chairman but leaving plenty of questions unanswered about the original deal that was struck when he took over at Swindon in 2013. That tangled web has found its way to the High Court and, via a judgement that was published last year, Gareth Barry’s name was thrown into the mix after Power alleged that the former England international had met with him in 2013 and agreed to equally fund Swindon’s “ongoing working capital requirements”. Barry denies being an investor in Swindon and agreeing anything with Power. Indeed, it is Michael Standing, Barry’s close friend and former agent, who claims to have gone into business with Power at Swindon and verbally agreed a 50 per cent share — something that would have breached Football Association (FA) regulations around ownership because of Standing’s occupation. The FA has since charged many of those involved. In truth, Standing has far more important things to worry about right now than being in trouble with the governing body, bearing in mind that he claims he is owed the best part of £4 million. Whatever comes of the ownership dispute, it will be interesting to see where Power turns up next. He has sold Waterford, the League of Ireland Premier Division club, and Swindon in the last two months, and if history is anything to go by, the 49-year-old will be looking to get involved with another football club soon. The EFL has, though, requested documents from the court hearings (not the proceedings where raspberries were blown and pornography played — more about that later) to dissect in the event of Power taking up a boardroom role at another club. Power’s backstory is colourful and complex, certainly after he hung up his boots. Raised in Peckham, south London, he played in the Premier League for Norwich City in the early 1990s and represented nine other professional clubs in England and Scotland, as well as the Republic of Ireland Under-21s. After retiring from football at the age of 28, Power had a spell as a football agent and later had stints in the boardroom at Luton Town, Cambridge United and Rushden & Diamonds before taking over at Swindon and Waterford. Outside of football, racing has long been one of his passions. He owns racehorses and has co-owned betting and racing newspapers, too. Indeed, it was the jockey Richard Dunwoody who introduced Power to the world of sports publishing. Power set up a company called Cre8 UK in 2003 with his business partner Daniel Lake, specialising in match-day programmes. According to an interview that Power gave to Irish sports website The42 in 2017, they had 44 professional football clubs among their clients, including three-quarters of the Premier League and all of the Premiership rugby union teams. Power said he was “fortunate enough to sell that” and then moved to Switzerland. Cre8 UK collapsed in 2009, owing creditors more than £2.1 million. Power was also registered as a director of another company called Cre8 Publishing but stood down shortly after its launch. Cre8 Publishing was put into liquidation three years later, owing unsecured creditors more than £2 million. “They said I left owing football clubs millions of pounds but I had already sold the company,” Power told the Independent in 2014. Swindon were flying high at the time of that interview, playing attractive football and, through Power’s contacts — in particular his close relationship with Tim Sherwood (Sherwood was Power’s best man at his wedding) — loaning and signing some talented players from Tottenham Hotspur. They finished fourth in League One that season and missed out on promotion to the Championship after losing to Preston in the play-off final. Power, Sherwood, Swindon Power (left) with Swindon’s then-director of football Tim Sherwood in November 2016 (Photo: Bryn Lennon/Getty Images) If that was the highlight of Power’s time at the club, last season was the nadir and culminated in Swindon finishing the season in a terrible state. By the time pre-season came around this summer, a new manager had come and gone in the space of a month, and not enough professionals left at the club to field a team. Morfuni’s takeover has brought fresh hope, heralding talk of a new era that comes with the promise of stability, transparency and fan engagement. Swindon’s new owner was pictured outside the County Ground on Tuesday, personally thanking every supporter who was queuing up to buy a season ticket. On the pitch, though, the club faces a huge challenge. Ben Garner, Swindon’s new head coach, inherited more trialists than professionals when he took over last week. The new season starts in nine days with a trip to Scunthorpe and Morfuni has made it clear that there can only be one objective in the short term: League Two survival. Warm applause breaks out as a suited figure makes his way past the Sid Mills Stand and around the perimeter of the pitch at the Webbswood Stadium, where kick-off against Swindon Supermarine is less than five minutes away. It is a balmy Tuesday evening in Wiltshire and there is a buzz around the non-League club’s ground, especially among the visiting supporters. “Is that the new owner?” asks a Swindon Town fan, looking across to the opposite side of the pitch. “I don’t think anyone else gets clapped walking around here,” says the supporter alongside him, smiling. It turns out that Clem Morfuni is not the only new face tonight. Thirteen of the 22 players in Swindon’s squad do not belong to the club. One is a former youth-team player who left Swindon more than 12 months ago and offered to step in to make up the numbers. Anthony Grant, who is 34 years old and was released by Swindon at the end of last season following their relegation from League One, is also involved after answering an SOS call. The rest are mainly trialists, from Enfield, Dunstable Town, Barrow, Port Vale, Greenock Morton, Birmingham, Swansea, Bournemouth — the list goes on. Sami Kern is the only scholar able to play because the rest of the youth team are self-isolating after a positive COVID-19 test the previous Saturday. The 16-year-old had travelled in a car to training while the rest were on a minibus. Swindon had been relying on those youngsters to make training work for the small number of professionals still under contract and to have enough players to get through their pre-season matches. The news that they were unavailable was met with disbelief. “You couldn’t make it up,” says one source. Word soon got around that Swindon needed help. Agents were peppered with messages saying that it was a chance for their players to train for a week with the club and to put themselves in the shop window in matches. Some were receptive to the idea. Others took one look at a club that has long been regarded by many as a basketcase and decided it was a waste of time. “You’ve got no manager — what’s the point in sending a player to you when there’s nobody to make a decision?” Swindon did have a new manager on May 26 but he resigned a month later without taking a training session. John McGreal and his assistant Rene Gilmartin became exasperated with the takeover battle and legal proceedings that made it nigh on impossible to make any permanent signings. McGreal described their positions as “untenable”. Steve Anderson, Swindon’s long-serving chief executive and an associate of Power, resigned the same morning, leaving the club rudderless three days before the players were due to report back for pre-season training. The clues had been there earlier in the day when a leasing company turned up to collect the club vehicles, including the kit van. “The coaching staff remaining at that time, along with the kitmen, did a great job scrambling to make other arrangements,” says new Swindon Town chief executive Rob Angus. Steve Mildenhall, the goalkeeper coach and a former Swindon player, was put in charge. It seems as though Mildenhall gets all the good jobs — a fortnight before McGreal took over as manager, he was asked to notify all 13 professionals who were out of contract that summer that they were being released. After McGreal’s unexpected departure, a decision was made to push pre-season back 72 hours, from Monday to Thursday, purely to buy some time. Then the players received a phone call to say that they were not going to be paid any wages. How could the club expect them to come in and train the next day? Pre-season was put back another three days and by this stage, two contracted players — Brett Pitman and Jonathan Grounds — made it clear that they would not be returning under the current circumstances. That left the club with only seven professionals: Jack Payne, Dion Conroy, Mathieu Baudry, Rob Hunt, Ellis Iandolo, Jordan Lyden and Joe Wollacott, who had signed on loan from Bristol City before McGreal left. In theory, there were eight but Harry Parsons was told by the club that the two-year professional contract he signed on June 14 — Swindon carried a story on their website showing the 18-year-old forward with a pen in his hand — was no longer valid. Parsons’ first professional contract had been due to start on July 1, which is standard practice, but Anderson, the chief executive who had signed the forms, no longer worked for the club by that date, rendering it null and void. With nobody left at the County Ground with the authority to sign off any paperwork of any significance — it is understood that a five-figure sponsorship deal was left sitting on the table — Parsons was asked to fill out trialist forms to enable him to carry on training and playing for the club in pre-season. “We can’t comment on specific cases but good young talented players, especially ones the club has helped produce, will be valued,” says Angus. Parsons has since agreed a new deal on better terms, to reflect the loyalty he showed this summer by continuing to train and play. But his is just one of many stories that capture the shambles that Swindon became. Yet, despite the chaos, coupled with the financial problems caused by COVID-19 that many clubs have experienced, the vast majority of those on the inside — players and staff — refused to down tools. The supporters’ trust got involved too and made a hardship fund available to anyone employed by the club who was struggling financially. All the while there was a determination to field a team for the pre-season matches — to build fitness for the few senior professionals left at the club but also to generate important funds for local non-League clubs, even if there was a possibility that Swindon would be embarrassed. They ended up drawing 0-0 with Melksham Town and then lost 3-2 at Hungerford. The team-sheets included unfamiliar names like Player A and Player B. “Cowmeadow and Bell? They’re just listing things they can see,” quipped one wag on Twitter when Swindon announced a callow line-up for the Melksham match. Twelve trialists were invited to the training ground the day before the Swindon Supermarine match to give them 24 hours — or at least one session — to get to know each other. At least they got off to a good start. Parsons scored the first goal of the Morfuni regime after eight minutes and by half-time, Swindon had raced into a 3-0 lead, with Mildenhall constantly offering encouragement to a team that had been thrown together almost overnight. At one stage, he apologised to the supporters by the dugout because his voice was so hoarse that it started to sound high-pitched. “Mildy has been doing an incredible job,” one Swindon player told The Athletic afterwards. “Within the circumstances, just getting a team together to play a few games has been a big achievement. He’s a goalkeeping coach. He’s not a manager or an assistant. What he’s done should be remembered, just for keeping the club going when it was on its last legs.” The fall was undignified and abrupt. One former first-team player is less diplomatic. “It was a complete and utter shambles,” he says. Swindon finished the 2020-21 campaign 23rd in League One and were relegated with a humbling 5-0 loss away to Franchise on April’s final weekend. The 29 league defeats they suffered was a club record inside a single campaign and the 89 goals conceded was a number unsurpassed by their one and only top-flight season in 1993-94, which brought up a perfectly rounded century of ignominy. After the joys of 2019-20, with promotion and the League Two title secured via a points-per-game metric, Swindon slowly sank to their knees. “The heart and soul of that promotion-winning side were cut into and ripped out overnight,” says a former senior player. “That was the worst season I’ve had in football. Everything about it was absolutely terrible. No organisation. No communication. It was a car crash, the whole thing.” Swindon’s supporter base has grown accustomed to not expecting the world. Since winning promotion to the Premier League under Glenn Hoddle in 1993, they have been relegated seven times. The last 10 years have seen Swindon bob between League One and League Two, never quite sure where to call home. There was a promotion to League One inspired by Paolo Di Canio in 2011-12 and then another by Richie Wellens in 2019-20, but both of those figureheads had gone within six months of success. Power’s influence had receded long before his formal departure last week. He was seldom seen around the County Ground last season. The alarm bells sounded soon after winning promotion as an attacking pair of Eoin Doyle and Jerry Yates could not be convinced to stay on. Captain Michael Doughty also chose to retire. “The team that got promoted was better than the team we had in League One. No question,” says one promotion-winner. “We couldn’t keep that core together. If the money had been put in to keep it, we could have reaped the rewards. From that point on, when players start leaving a promoted team, it became doom and gloom.” Wellens was not backed and soon grew unsettled last autumn, joining Salford City in the division below. Wins were hard to come by under successor John Sheridan and the sale of star man Diallang Jaiyesimi to Charlton at the end of the January window depicted a side accepting its fate. Power, only days later, suggested Swindon were on the edge of a financial abyss. “We’re on the rockface, hanging over the edge,” he told BBC Radio Wiltshire. Players soon became aware of the money drying up. “There were signs that felt like things weren’t right,” says one dressing-room source. “Things like tape, bandages in the medical room… we had a backlog of payments, money that was due to suppliers of that kind of equipment. “Players needed that stuff but we hadn’t paid the bills. That was kind of nitty-gritty that affected us. “There was also an issue with players wanting scans on injuries. The club thought there were too many scans taking place, even though insurance would have covered most of the cost of a £500 MRI scan. “They’re just paying the excess but they took issue with sending us to be scanned. It got to the point where a couple of lads were offering to pay for their own scans on injuries because the club were reluctant to send them to get it done. They were dragging it out so much.” “Issues around suppliers are being dealt with and suppliers are starting to be paid, and going forwards, will be paid on time,” says Angus. “Going forwards, players will get the quality medical treatment that they would expect.” New depths came in the wake of Jack Deaman, the club’s strength and conditioning coach, leaving the club in March. “We were left without a ******* strength and conditioning coach,” the player adds. “So, on a match day, we didn’t have anyone looking after that side of the warm-ups. This is going to sound daft but we didn’t even have anyone around who could make up the post-match protein shakes. “A member of staff — the kit man — offered to make them for us, the protein shakes for the boys, to help with recovery. He was doing a lot of stuff, in fairness. But he was told (by the club) that he wasn’t qualified to do that. It’s a scoop of protein in water! And he was told he was not qualified to do that for us! “So we weren’t getting protein shakes, we weren’t getting the right warm-ups, we weren’t getting the right gym sessions. It all adds up. It just helped ensure that we were absolutely miles off it. The club was a bit of a laughing stock.” The players stopped wearing their GPS vests because nobody at the club knew how to download the data and make sense of it. “We have appointed a very strong medical and physiotherapy team to provide top-quality support to our playing and coaching staff going forwards,” says Angus. The drip, drip, drip of shortcomings brought a run of just six wins in 28 games after an unlikely victory over rivals Oxford United in November. Sheridan, it proved, was not the man to inspire a revival. “There was one game when we were in the changing room and the manager (Sheridan) wasn’t there,” explains a player. “Nobody knew the team or who was on the bench. “We were warming ourselves up, trying to hear over the tannoy who was playing. Then, we get back to the changing room and the manager still isn’t there. Ten minutes before kick-off, he strolls in. Doesn’t say a word to anyone — just writes out a team on the board. We were in a relegation battle and that’s how we were preparing.” Sheridan denies this happened. “It’s just players making excuses,” he says. “This is one of the reasons I’m not going to be involved in football anymore. I’ve retired… it’s totally untrue. “They were in a relegation fight before I even went into the place. And, to be fair to the owner, he put everything into the club, but the team was struggling really badly before I went in the place, so the players have just got to look at themselves.” Sheridan was sacked before the inevitable relegation and the end of a bleak season brought a further exodus of players. One of those was Taylor Curran, whose regular involvement with the first team at Swindon had been a constant source of frustration for some of his team-mates. Signed in 2019 from Southend United, where he did not make a first-team appearance, Curran was given a new three-year contract at Swindon in August 2020 despite featuring in only two league matches the previous season, both as an 89th-minute substitute. In two and a half years at the club, Curran made 19 appearances but only three of those were league starts. He was an unused substitute on 63 occasions and some Swindon players and supporters were left baffled as to what was going on, and why he was constantly in the match-day squad. Curran joined Maidstone in the National League South earlier this month. For those still at the club, wages were not initially forthcoming for June and only when the Professional Footballers’ Association intervened was there a 60 per cent payment, with the promise of more in the next pay packet. Staff have now been paid the remainder of their remaining June wages and have also been paid in full for July. Among Swindon’s list of debtors from last season is the town’s council. They own the land on which the County Ground stands but have gone without rent since April 2020. The outstanding money now totals in the region of £270,000 and a payment plan had been agreed. Legal action, initiated by Swindon Borough Council, is now under way. “The next rent payment has been paid and we are working with Swindon Borough Council (Championship) with regard to unpaid rent, but there is strong goodwill and positive discussions,” says Angus. “We remain committed to purchasing the Count Ground from Championship with the supporters via TrustSTFC and know all parties are committed to this.” A High Court hearing in February this year was held over Microsoft Teams but, according to one barrister present, soon descended into a circus. Members of the public refused to set their calls to “mute”, conspired to place the judge on mute, blew raspberries into the call, and shared screens showing male pornography. Master Iain Pester told the barristers: “I’ve got quite a strange screen at the moment. I’m wondering who’s interfering with the conduct of the court?” He later added: “I’m afraid if this goes on, I’m going to say only the representatives of the parties can attend because we can’t have a hearing like this.” Soon after, a member of the public was heard to shout “suck my dick”. Others on the call wrote #PowerOut into the text chat. In May 2020, the High Court had published a significant judgement that referred to an ongoing dispute between Power and the football agent Michael Standing. It was a compelling web of claim and counterclaim, the most remarkable of which centred on the allegation that Gareth Barry part-owned Swindon. Barry and Standing are long-standing friends after coming through the ranks as young players at Brighton and Aston Villa together. Standing’s claim is that up to 50 per cent of Power’s share in the club was held in a trust for him after he had previously secured an interim injunction that prevented Power from selling the club without his permission. The dispute dates back to 2013 when Power purchased the club. Power acknowledges that a second person was involved in the acquisition but, as the judgement reads, “extraordinarily he says that it was not Mr Standing, but his, Mr Standing’s, very good friend, the well-known England international footballer, Mr Gareth Barry”. Power goes on to dispute that either Standing or Barry owned 50 per cent of the club but “does accept that Mr Barry has certain contractual rights”. Standing, for his part, outlines an oral agreement from March 2013, whereby he and Power would buy the club on a 50/50 basis. However, the judgement explains that Standing’s involvement had to remain confidential as he ran the risk of breaching FA regulations concerning the ownership of football clubs. Standing had an interest in an agency called First Touch Professional Management and Barry was a client. The FA prohibits intermediaries of agents from owning or having interests in football clubs, and current players (as Barry was at the time) are unable to hold shares in a football club. In April this year, the FA charged Swindon, Power, First Touch and its company director Standing with a breach of regulations regarding the ownership and/or funding of the League One club. The case is ongoing and all parties have yet to comment. According to the court papers, Barry “says categorically that he was not the investor and did not agree to anything with Mr Power”. He does, however, accept that he lent Standing “some of the money needed to fund the acquisition and for ongoing working capital contributions but that he did so as a good friend of Mr Standing and he himself has no rights or interests in the club”. The two parties, Power and Standing, therefore, both appear to accept there was a silent partner in play but although Standing insists it was him, Power claims it was Barry. Power’s account alleges a meeting was held at Barry’s home in March 2013, at which it was agreed that Power and Barry would equally fund the club’s “ongoing working capital requirements”. Power further alleges that although Barry would not own shares in the club, he would be owed 50 per cent of the profits from any increase in value of Swindon, “including 50 per cent of net profits arising from sales of certain players”. Standing, however, counters that he was the silent partner. Power’s account argues his belief that Standing was acting on behalf of Barry, while Standing said “he did not think it necessary to put the agreement into writing as he had trust and confidence at the time in Mr Power”. The identity of the co-owner remains unclear but the court judgement shows how relations between Power and Standing drastically deteriorated. Standing claims alarm bells started to ring when Matt Ritchie was sold to Newcastle United by Bournemouth for £12 million in 2016. Ritchie was previously a Swindon player and a sell-on clause meant that Swindon received £1.85 million of the proceeds. Standing argues this was to be split between him, as the co-owner, and Power. However, the club’s previous owner Andrew Black had a debenture covering a £2 million loan to the club and wanted his money returned to him from the profits made on Ritchie. Standing, who thought he would be in line for £925,000 from the Ritchie sale, therefore found himself sacrificing that sum, and adding an extra £75,000 to make up his share of the £2 million owed to Black. Yet the court document alleges that in 2019, Standing uncovered that Black had not received his money and the debenture still existed. The document adds that Black’s accountant confirmed this to be true as of April 2020 and it “does not appear to be disputed by Mr Power”. Matters worsened on June 7, 2019, when Standing says he discovered Power had sold a 15 per cent stake in the club to Axis group, owned by Morfuni. Standing alleges he had first discovered the news in a local newspaper. It later transpired Axis had paid £1.1 million. Then, in August 2019, Power told Standing that an American-based company, Able, was interested in buying the club and a letter of intent stated it was prepared to pay £7.5 million. Power claims Able has links to a Boston-based commercial property company called the Abbey Group, whose main shareholders also own stakes in the Boston Celtics. Standing argued that his original agreement with Power meant that Power was unable to sell the club without Standing’s consent, yet Standing alleges he had not been consulted. The document adds: “Mr Standing was also extremely concerned that Mr Power would not properly account for his share of the proceeds of any such sale.” The court paper continues by alleging that Power “took steps to prevent Mr Standing from having access to financial information concerning the club”, such as allegedly changing the online banking log-in details and removing Standing’s accountant as a director of Swindon. This, Standing claims, prevented him from being able to gauge the club’s financial performance. The judgement continues: “As a result, Mr Standing refused to provide any more funds by way of working capital. Since the acquisition, Mr Standing had provided over £6 million in loans to the club and after some repayments, the current amount outstanding to him is over £3.7 million. “Despite that huge investment in the club, some of it borrowed from Mr Barry, Mr Standing now had no access to any financial information and Mr Power appeared to be trying to sell the club without letting him know or giving any transparency as to the terms of any sale so that he could secure his position.” Both Standing and Morfuni secured injunctions to block the sale to Able, despite Power telling the court that blocking the sale risked administration for Swindon and £5.8 million in costs to Power. Yet the judge argued that a deal worth £7.5 million was unlikely in the circumstances of a pandemic and dismissed Power’s claim. Able has never commented publicly on the matter. In the next 12 months or so, there will be a trial to resolve all remaining matters between Power and Standing. Standing, Barry and Power declined to comment when contacted by The Athletic. “Football tragic”, “construction guy”, “fair dinkum Aussie”. Clemente Giovanni Bruno Morfuni — “Clem” to everyone who has spent more than five minutes in his company — is many things but he knows what he’s not. “I’m no Roman Abramovich,” the plumber-turned-plutocrat admits when asked if he is going to shower Swindon with money. “But I’ve done OK. My business turns over a couple hundred million dollars a year — it makes enough. “I’d like to run this club properly, make it sustainable. I want to clean it up and make the fans and the town proud of it again. I’ll put enough in to get us back to where we should be. We’re a Championship club at a minimum but that could take five years or 10. “It’s a great club with so much potential, and I wouldn’t be involved if it wasn’t for the fans and the community in Swindon. They love the club and they deserve better.” It is a manifesto for change that fans at hundreds of clubs around the world would sign up for in a heartbeat but why Wiltshire? How does a guy from Sydney end up as the saviour of Swindon? It’s simple, really: Australia likes football but it prefers Australian rules football, rugby league and cricket. The 51-year-old Morfuni, on the other hand, loves the game, plays twice a week and has been sponsoring Australian grassroots soccer for years. Ideally, he would own a team closer to New South Wales than old South Wales but, as he puts it, “the other Australian sports are too big — it’s hard to make an impact with Aussie soccer”. And making an impact is what Clem is about. He launched his first company, Axis Plumbing NSW, in 1994. Nine years later, Axis had spread to Queensland and by 2006, it had subsidiaries across Australia and its first overseas operation in New Zealand. Axis Services Group now operates in Thailand, the UK and the US too, and employs 700 people. In fact, it was when Morfuni opened the UK office in 2008 that he first mentioned to one of his managers that he wanted to buy a club. “The guy said, ‘Don’t do that — it’s cheaper to sponsor one and my son is involved at Harrow Borough (a non-League team in north west London)’,” he recalls. “He set up a meeting and I told them I wanted to sponsor the club. They thought I was full of shit, so they just made up a number. They were a bit shocked when I said yes and wrote them a cheque straight away.“ That relationship bumped along for a few years — the club cleared some debts and enjoyed a period of relative success — but, as Morfuni puts it, “it’s non-League, right?”. He wanted a bit more bang for his bucks. He cannot remember exactly when he met Lee Power for the first time but they were introduced by a mutual associate in the construction business, and agreed to have dinner in London. Axis first appeared on the back of Swindon’s shirts in 2015. Then, in 2019, Power asked Morfuni if he wanted to buy a 15 per cent stake for £1.1 million. In for a penny, in for a pound, thought Clem. But it was only when his involvement in the club went from paying for the privilege of using them as a sandwich board to having to chip in 15 per cent of Swindon’s budget deficits that Morfuni started to realise all was not as it seemed at the County Ground. He and Power never really “fell out” — “he’s not a bad guy” is Morfuni’s assessment — but Morfuni was now getting regular messages from fans. Then he found out about Standing’s claim to own 50 per cent of the club, and his close links with Gareth Barry. Then came the proposed sale to American group Able. Power, though, made two mistakes when he informed Standing and Morfuni that he wanted to sell the club: one, he made Standing realise there was no point hoping Power would honour whatever private deal they made when Power became Swindon’s public owner in 2013, and two, whatever he offered Able, he was obliged to offer Morfuni. A legal battle with Standing was unavoidable — it was the only way Standing would ever get any of his money back — but Power had now given Morfuni a path to acquiring the 85 per cent of Swinton Reds, the holding company, he did not already own for the far more reasonable price of £2,500 a share, or £212,500. It took several trips to the High Court to enforce this claim but Power was eventually forced to transfer the shares to Morfuni for the contractual price. In a recent interview with Talksport, Power said: “Obviously, I’m not happy. It’s an aggressive takeover, hence why we went to court and fought it. I lost — that’s it and I take that on the chin. I have to abide by the court order. “In the meantime, people are expecting me to pay the wages, for maintenance, for this and that… it’s like selling a house and in the meantime, ‘Lee, can you put in a new kitchen and do the roof?’. I can’t be expected to fund the club.” The fact he stopped funding the club properly sometime before the court ordered him to sell to Morfuni was left unchallenged. When you have been through a relationship as stormy as they have, Clem had most Swindon fans at “hello” but the EFL needs a little more persuading in these post-Bury days as to who they let buy clubs. Morfuni had already passed the EFL’s owners’ and directors’ test (ODT) when he bought the minority stake but, with concerns about Swindon’s ability to start the new season growing, the league asked him to provide much more information about his finances so it could fast-track approval for the change of ownership once Power released those shares. Morfuni did not bat an eyelid and sent the league each and every document it asked for, so when Power finally folded, Clem was in. He had already put £300,000 into an escrow account for settling Swindon’s most pressing bills. Paying the June wage bill was high on the list but that probably will not stop the EFL from charging the club. Given the circumstances, the EFL is unlikely to push for the death penalty but, as Derby County and Sheffield Wednesday have recently discovered, it is not giving out lunchtime detentions for late payments anymore. The EFL’s compliance team has seen too many bright dawns cloud over to get excited about anyone — its mantra is that he ODT is a test of eligibility, not suitability — but The Athletic understands that Morfuni has impressed them. The league will keep its hand on the tiller for a bit, via a business plan monitoring arrangement, and the club is still under a registration embargo as a condition of the pandemic loan it took from the EFL, as well as various unpaid bills. But hopes are high that Morfuni will quickly get them sailing in the right direction again. His first week in charge saw Angus, the deputy chair of the Swindon Town Supporters’ Trust, appointed as club CEO and new staff arrive, most notably Ben Garner as head coach and Ben Chorley as director of football. So, what’s next? “Year one: sort out the debts, keep the club alive, rebuild the team,” explains Morfuni. “Year two: try to get out of League Two. Years three to five: push for the Championship but we don’t want to go up until the club is ready and can sustain itself.” Finally, though, Swindon Town is looking ahead with optimism.
    1 point
  26. Possession of drugs, for instance, is a victimless crime, but very hard to see how it can apply to any firm of assault (except for well-documented cases in the past involving consenting adults…).
    1 point
  27. Would/could that be the same legal advisor that told anybody who was listening that the club had a watertight case against Sainsburys a few years ago? Yeah, I wouldn't count on the "legal expert" that they have to know the difference between a chicken and a cow!
    1 point
  28. War Baby … Tom Robinson
    1 point
  29. All getting very heated. If i was Wael i would unveil the new stadium plans to distract them.......oh wait...
    1 point
  30. Thanks for sharing your knowledge @Fordy62 - very interesting to get a take on this from those of you who are involved in the legal system. With regards to the awful statement, which I understand has now been amended on the Rovers website, the club were originally quoting from the Evening Standard report with regards to what the Crown Prosecutor had said in Court. The Evening Standard have also amended their online copy now. I saw online that some legal eagle with a blue tick had picked up the Standard reporter's error - which, I understand, should have read "victimless prosecution". I would liked to have thought that the club's legal adviser would have queried the accuracy of this before the notorious statement was signed off - maybe the tea lady signed it off, it's Rovers after all. Apart from that, there was no need to include it in the club statement, and I think that they were trying to mislead those who didn't have knowledge of legal terminology.
    1 point
  31. Candyman! CANDYMAN! CANDY......!
    1 point
  32. Squabbling like rats in a sack over on slagchat
    1 point
  33. I agree with the decision that the charity made, but equally I agree with the fact the debt to society has been met by the guilty. It leaves me feeling quite conflicted. I probably work with people who have been found guilty of drink driving, and in the many thousands of people I work with there is bound to be someone who has been directly impacted by the actions of someone drunk behind the wheel. I'm not sure where the role you do should be an additional punishment vs the fines and time you might also be (rightfully) given by a court.
    1 point
  34. You're getting confused - that's Danny Simpson's modus operandi
    1 point
  35. He reads the weather on North East News...
    1 point
  36. My pet caterpillar has asked me to inform you that he resents the comparison of R*vers plight with his gonads. He would prefer that you use the term 'Millipede's Manbag' from now on. Thanks.
    1 point
  37. With power gone the feel good factor is back. Queuing for season tickets?
    1 point
  38. Look. I'll contact my friends on my government trackable smart phone, get in my car with a government mandated license and insurance, travel to the pub with a government license to serve heavily regulated alcohol (the government has banned the kids I got with from having any though), before going to the city ground regularly inspected by government health and safety teams with multiple licenses, and sitting in my seat as the government have banned terraces so I can't stand. I'll have to have a cigarette on the way though as the government have banned me smoking and drinking in there. What I will NOT acquiesce to though is the government deciding what I can and can't do!
    1 point
  39. You're miles out in your estimation. It's 2-2,500 under-50s in England, even using the government's shit "28-days" method of calculation, which will understate deaths in the younger cohort; https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths?areaType=nation&areaName=England And even if most deaths are in over 50s, so what? Are we all on the metaphorical scrap heap after then?? Your rather blasé attitude also ignores Long Covid which can strike any age range and fitness level. Ask Steve Cotterell if he recommends getting that? It has been estimated to have affected 2 million Britons and it represents a massive challenge going forward to the NHS. No, a discussion can legitimately be held over whether Vaccine Passporting is worthwhile in football stadiums - or what alternative measures might be used - but belittling the impact and the continuing danger of the virus is not the way to do it.
    1 point
  40. The Pandremix problem - a very small number of serious side effects in 12-16-year-olds - were observable within weeks. They didn't suddenly come to light years after vaccination. The mechanism of how a sudden rise in immune response could trigger narcolepsy in a very tiny number of adolescents is now understood. Although Pandemrix was within product safety limits, it had gone through Phase III trials involving 6,000 volunteers, it was withdrawn for use in this age range as other vaccines that protected against H1N1 were available and these were used instead on this cohort. In total, around 17 cases of narcolepsy were linked to this particular vaccine out of 30 million doses administered. Most countries using the vaccine did not record any raised incidence rates of narcolepsy following their Avian Flu immunisation campaigns. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30122647/ In the case of the various Covid vaccines, Phase III trials were conducted on several hundred thousand people 15 months ago and they've gone on to be administered to 2,000% more people than received the Avian Flu vaccines. Serious side effects reporting has been negligible given the vast number of doses administered. In every Covid vaccine approved for use in this country, SSE are well within normal medicinal guidelines. Because there is a multiplicity of choice available, as with the H1N1 jab, we were even able to switch AZ away from certain age groups from an overabundance of caution. Taking AZ if you're under 30 is still safer than getting on an aeroplane. However other Covid vaccines were even safer, so we are using them. So, to answer your patronising question: Yes, I do understand how vaccines work and yes, I already know about Pandemrix. However, it appears you still do not understand how vaccines work or understand statistical risk.
    1 point
  41. My biggest fear about these lunatics spouting unjustifiable nonsense is the way their nonsense will be used to try to bully those with genuinely held concerns about the direction of travel with regard to vaccine passports and that is dangerous. Personally I am really uncomfortable with the removal of access to normal things like football, concerts etc if you have not received 2 vaccinations. It does not sit well at all.
    1 point
  42. You don't really understand vaccines do you? They aren't implants, that stay inside you for years. All they are is a wake up call to your immune system. After a day or so, it's just your own bloodstream doing all the clever stuff about remembering a pathogen. It isn't the Manchurian Candidate - your immune system won't suddenly kill you 10 years after you've had an injection. And it isn't a case that "nobody knows this". People do know this, because the basic mechanism for ALL vaccines is the same. And we've had mass vaccination campaigns since the 1950s; campaigns that have eradicated a number of dangerous diseases from the West. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Look in a way, I share some of your doubts as to whether a Vaccine Passport should really be necessary at AG. I certainly can imagine the government and our club buggering up the implementation! HOWEVER, if it decides it is, it isn't "blackmail and coercion". Your life doesn't depend on watching City live. No one's does. AG is a private premise. It has always had rules that govern entrance: Some set by the FA or the government; some set by the club. If it's decided it's necessary to keep people safe at a time that our infection rate is the highest in the world (and despite the fall over the last 7 days, it still is) then I think we have to live with it. It will not be forever. It is unlikely to be for very long at all. The last thing clubs want is to turn any potential customers away. It certainly isn't worth having some libertarian tantrum over.
    1 point
  43. You are just full of nonsense I’m afraid. People have tried to engage with you in an adult conversation but time and again you either can’t prove or even back up to any extent your argument, write childish responses (see new items above) or just write rubbish which is immediately disproved to which you then get upset and or defensive about. This is a common theme across most anti vaxxer contributions I see across social media and in discussion threads. No one here is ‘shitting themselves behind the sofa’ just wanting to do what is right and proper based upon the facts available.
    1 point
  44. Please stop it! ? “Good name” ?
    1 point
  45. Getting rid of a present club employee convicted of an offence carried out whilst in the employment of the club would not be the same as hiring one who was convicted 5-6 years ago and with no apparent repeat of those offences since is it? If you don’t believe in second chances that’s fine but to put a narrative out there that they will do the right thing and we haven’t is bizarre quite honestly.
    1 point
  46. What's all this about Derby "accepting" a suspended 3 point penalty? Surely a punishment for breaching law/rules is given to the offender - whether they like it or not. This makes it sound as though this has all been cosily agreed, by negotiation, behind closed doors (or across a dining table!?!) If this goes on much longer and the EFL backtrack much further they will be giving Derby a 6 points flying start over the rest if the championship and £10m to help them get back on their feet. I do not apologise fir my cynicism!
    1 point
  47. Absolutely not. Ridiculous suggestion. Barely a case in this country and China getting to grips with it from what I’ve heard.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...