Dan Robin

Feedback after first half: bad again except for the last 10 minutes.

Second best for most of the first half, then we grew in the last minutes (partly thanks tò the change of shape) and the lead was not so strange. A long way to go though

Last game of my monthly pass and for now I won't renew it. One of the reason Is that I didn't receive a full refund for the famous double payment error (20£ instead of 25). I hope the service will increase, because my previous experiences with RobinsTV were better than the current One

Injuries again and again and again... Pessimistic about today's game. Anyway, COYR!

I didn'try watching from our site, but on the app it worked perfectly this time.

A negative result, but great effort from the lads, especially for the defensive work done. There were some good attacking moments in the second half too, but we lacked a bit of quality and some subs were not so effective. Max could have done better for their second goal but he made also some good saves.

Satisfied with our performance so far: we battled well and our play has been OK overall, with some promising attacks here and there. They created much more but when we were on top (at the start of the game), we should have had a penalty (not surprising eh?!? ), so...we deserved something, and Kal gave us a goal. Il will be a tough second half, and the annoying booking given to Dickie will be a danger.

Tanner not even on the bench: damn injuries! Honestly I don't expect points today, but never say never.

I thought the game wasn't available on the app/site because it was streamed on Sky and on Italian DAZN, but I tried and it was being shown on the app too. That being said, I preferred to watch DAZN so I can't give my feedback about the service this time. Talking about refunds...I'm waiting news about a double payment error.

After their goal I was worried because they were pushing heavily to get the second and we were shaky for a few minutes...so I would have taken a draw. However the lads were able to regain control on the game and Tommy's magic made the rest. In the first half the game was quite balanced, even if their attacks were generally more fluid. In the second half we were still not spectacular but attacked with more frequency and at the end we got rewarded. Refereeings remain an irritating issue.

Perfect shot from the distance, stunning acrobatic goal, last season he scored with headers too. We had some good strikers over the years but..I guess he's the most complete striker we've had in the team since Maynard.

GEEEET IIIIINNN!!! Even more amazing than the first one

Now defend the point, please!

FFSS, left alone in the area.

TOOOOOOMMMYYY!!!

Conway still not ready it seems. Weimann for Sykes makes sense, but as next sub I'd try Mehmeti instead of Yeboah (for Bell)

Really bad start, with no attacking threat and unvoluntary assists to opponents that caused trouble. Then we became tidy, conceded them less space and had a few good moments upfront, penalty shouts included, but they were more dangerous in the last minutes. Complicated game as expected.

Cornick playing well, some good actions on the left flank.

Another penalty not given. Better attacking play now.

Not a great show so far.

Watching the game on DAZN Italy. Come On You Robins!

I was particularly disappointed with the app: maybe I was the only one with this problem, but I couldn't see the match full screen by rotating the smartphone (whereas with the video of the official site the rotation worked). Then the stream didn't work at all, like it happened to me with the audio pass of the Preston H game: I pressed play but the video stopped every 2 seconds. Even in this case, no problem with the site's streaming, so probably only an app issue.

Stats (not all reliable I'd say) are one thing, watching how the teams play is another one. How many times/minutes did Stoke really caused us trouble? I can think at last minutes of the first half, beginning of the second half, last minutes of the second half (and this "low amount of attacking threat" was partly our merit). All the rest, was Bristol City possession and chances/half chances created...so hardly an even game. Did we play far better than them in the first half? Surely yes, and their out-of-nowhere eurogoal doesnt change it. In the second half, did the subs brought us back on top or were uneffective? Yes, the changes had a positive effect and we started dominating the game again. We couldn't capitalize the superiority so you could say we were "wasteful" (a bit of a habit, I'd say) but I think "weak" is quite unfair and doesn't really reflect our performance, except - like I said - our defending for their two second-half goals. Unfortunately sometimes the opposition team play quite badly/produces almost nothing but somehow find the net, whereas your team play far better but can't score enough: that's what happened today. Clearly we could have done better...but personally despite the disappointment for the result, I see more positive than negatives today. It can sound weird, BUT...

Weak for 75 minutes?!? What game did you watch?!? Only criticism today can be defending for one or two of their goals, but for the rest we were superior: that's why it hurts. Anyway, let's hope this missed chance will be followed by a positive reaction.

I was about to write that a draw would have been disapponting because we have been clearly the better side, but for Bristol City when things have to go bad they go even worse... Really gutted to lose this game and worried about the impact it could have on the next match