Bob Turnip

OJ Simpson dies aged 76

Was subbed at half-time - hopefully planned as you say.

Very good

That's fair. Good reply

I didn't know you could do this! Thanks for the tip

It was a question, which can't really be answered by anyone. We were obviously lied to.

Yes well put. I was just trying to move away from Manning being judged based on the exact wording that JL fed us, which some people are doing. Realistically if you take away the anger of NP going the way he did (of which I'm still cross about), and all the lie's, then I think people would be more accepting of Manning needing time to implement. Yeah, incompetence for sure!!

I haven't made an argument, but thanks.

Not sure where I've made any excuses for anyone. Just asked a question. Where did I say we should be OK with the lies? I'm not OK with the lies, which you'd know if you engaged rather than just assumed. Of course we should hold people to account for failing. My point being for all we know JL and Tin's said to LM, don't worry about this season, just keep us up and focus on next season (that's just an example before you lose the plot), therefore LM's remit will be different to what we've been told. I don't think anyone thinks they were being honest about anything, so yes they should be held to account for lying to us.

Sorry, what? Desperate for what? Was just pointing out that whatever discussions were had between them probably wasn't along the lines of what we were told.

Sorry for late reply, but how do you know this was the remit? Were you in the room with them when he was told this during the recruitment process? Just because JL and BT fed us fans a load of tripe, doesn't mean they said the same to LM.

How do you know what remit Manning was given/accepted? Were you involved in the recruitment process? Do you actually think JL said "you have a top six squad there Liam - challenge for promotion this season or it's failure" and that Manning said "sure where do I sign". You seem to be confusing the rubbish JL tried feeding to us, with actual private discussions held with our new manager.

We went there for lunch on Saturday - totally agree, thought it was excellent. The mussels were fantastic. We also had scallops, then the hake and the sole for mains. All washed down with a lovely bottle of white. Great lunch - we'll be back too!

But it's not instead of. You can do both. Do you really think it's that black and white? Regards the second part, @Harry has already replied to you on this, but I don't think you've acknowledged.

What contradictions?