Jump to content

Corleone

Members
  • Posts

    1145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

30

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

901 profile views
  1. SC has said we can't play two wingers....so peRson on the left and Burns on the right makes perfect sense....probably with pack and Elliot in the middle.
  2. Stats that are completely irrelevant because it fails to highlight how good the chances were.
  3. And now plying is trade 2nd bottom in league 1.... Oh no, wait, I seem to have got a bit confused!!!
  4. Despite Maynard gobbing off Bristolians he is 5 times the player of Baldock.
  5. Scored goals for fun for west ham didn't he....o no big sam quickly dropped him and sold him, surprise surprise. No club would sign him? What like Steve Davies who went to Blackpool? Taxi.
  6. I don't hate Baldock I just think he is very very average.
  7. Yet no champ clubs in for him. says it all. A true league 1 footballer....wonder how many other clubs in this league spent that kind of money on average league 1 players.
  8. Absolutely not, clearly he is an average league 1 striker.
  9. To think we sacrificed 1.5 million for him. Clearly that was a very poor piece of business.
  10. No it wasn't, it was your bum chums lack of finishing that cost us. Hence why Baldock has got a 6 page thread where as Flint has 2. Baldock is average average average.
  11. Your tongue is still firmly wedged up Baldocks arse...... The comparison your making to Pittman is one of a desperate man.....the fact Pittman made so many appearances off the bench combined in a team that created NOTHING in the division ABOVE just confirms just how clueless you are. They shouldn't be compared, but personally would much prefer Brett at this level than baldock.
  12. Like I said in another thread, if Maybard had the same service that Baldock gets now he would of bagged 20/25 already this season. For the amount of chances he gets he is very much an a average striker IMO.
×
×
  • Create New...