thatchersgold

We went last year and watched inter, games was moved for the so new dates bout 6 weeks before we went sign up as. member on website easy to get tickets, we had to have our name on ticket and a driving license to prove who we was when we got there 

2 hours ago, Taunton_BCFC said:

Go get him!! Total rebuild needed at this club! If we go down we go down! A decent league one campaign could ignite the club! 

What a plonker

7 minutes ago, frenchred said:

Don't ask questions like that you'll be told your a gas head, not a true fan, anything you do like, why don't you do one.... He is the Messiah as we should all know and agree!

What a nause u r, I want him out im just intrigued to no the other opinion, yes I no a big word for you to comprehend 

Out of interest the those in the keep Pearson camp can I ask the opinions of y? 

Vyner needs to be as far away from the 1st team as possible 

4 hours ago, Davefevs said:

No, the default is that sell-ones persist through all future transfers unless specific clauses are added.

So, Colchester had a sell-on when he went to Peterborough.

Colchester and city have a sell-on now he’s moved from Peterborough to Blackburn.

Colchester’s “return” is less and less each time, e.g. 20% initially, then 20% of 20% (4%) this transfer.

Obviously none of us have sight if the transfer deal itself so all guesswork. 

Surely when he left us for Peterborough Colchester would of had there percentage of a sell? Not no he is moving again? 

Any private parking for this event? The busses are all full

5 minutes ago, chinapig said:

I'm becoming a little confused (my default setting admittedly!).

I saw a statement from the EFL that Derby had submitted their revised accounts before the deadline but the BBC reported that they had yet to be submitted. Though they may have meant submitted to Companies House perhaps.

As to the agreed points deduction I have not seen any unequivocal statement that Derby had in fact agreed it and saw a report elsewhere that it now has to be negotiated with the administrators, who are unlikely to agree to it.

We now have a bland statement from the EFL following administration but the facts of the case are still not clear - at least to me.

Was on sky sports just over a week ago saying they had agreed a reduced 9point deduction, the efl often accept as it saves on court costs etc but if not agreed can actually be more points 

Just now, Monkeh said:

Depends when they finish auditing all the accounts

But I expect it will by by the end of October

With further punishments possible

I thought after they agreed a 9 point deduction this was there way around getting both. Certainly hope there punished further

59 minutes ago, Monkeh said:

Yes

Will that be immediate? Or next season

Will they also be getting the 9 point deduction for breaking financial rules which they were close to agreeing?