middlehitter40

umm, Steve no you are not. also Steve L, Jon L you and your company's are losers too.

well said Mr Lansdown. ps are you Steve or Jon

it's a matter of record that SL approached the rover's board first and they turned him down. Again the comparison between rovers, Eastville and the dog company joint ownership are striking. it's worse in my view for city because SL wants to control everything and when he realises that he can't I think he will throw his toys out the pram and walk away. The BBC RB interview shows the cracks are their. The second part is he is a capitalist and therefore will seize assets when the opportunity occurs. AG is now gone forever as Eastville went for Rovers in the 50's as long as he is interested or needs a play thing for junior City will be fine. When this comes to an end City will follow a similar path to Rovers.