Jump to content

CitySSeven

Members
  • Posts

    111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CitySSeven

  1. At least we didn't lose. Showed good character to come back from a 2 goal deficit
  2. Funny how I thought O'Dowda was one of our poorest players. He hasn't played too much of pre season so I'll let him off, but he seemed a bit one dimensional didn't show skill on the ball and didn't have his head up. He did one good run though. Hope he gets fit soon.
  3. At least we have cup games to try and bounce back instead of potentially risking more league games. I'm more annoyed at wolves' loss than tonights.
  4. It's a good point don't get me wrong, but it'll looks a better point at the end of the season. Everyone else around us won, so Perhaps just on todays results needed a win?? On to Tuesday CTID
  5. Everyone buggered off to fix the gasleak at the Mem, still 0-0 don't worry
  6. If I was Manager With that team, I'd play 3 at the back. and have the extra body in midfield. JB, MP and KS being in midfield is our only solution to our weakness which is midfield. We can't buy anyone, so add an extra body.
  7. See I don't know. To me it looked like we were playing 3ATB, but as the full backs were always pushing up, I couldn't tell if KS and JB were playing wing backs or if it was HM that was at LB and JB at LM. Assuming it is 4-4-2, when Bailey Wright comes back, Surely we can't drop any of them. AF won Player of the Month, Nathan Baker is our Best CB and Bailey Wright is Captain. I can see us moving to 3ATB if we haven't done already. Unless BW plays RB. But then what do you do when EP Returns, albeit in a few months. Nice problems to have
  8. The way AB reads the team out actually seems like we are going 4-4-2. Strange.... 3 at the back would suit the line-up better IMO
  9. 3 CBs on the field? HM wouldn't play LB as Joe Bryan is on the pitch. 100% 3 ATB
  10. The Only reason we play 3 at the back is because we have 3 very solid CBs and none of them are droppable.
×
×
  • Create New...