Simon bristol

And would the replacement be the right man?! History says we would balls that up too!

Agree re players who couldnt care less, but 7 of them were brought in by pearson in an attempt to instill his standards on the rest, but arguably they arent good enough, and the standards havent raised. If pearson cant get them organised and motivated and hard to play against, whichnis what a nigel pearson side should be, then he shouldnt be here.

Always good to hear about young uns getting their first contract, congratulations to him!

We went straight to chelsea and signed kalas palmer and Dasilva with it!

Yep, pull up in the range rovers and lamborghinis, being fantastically well rewarded for being a low end championship footballer, while losing most of the time,,, with a nicey Nicey chairman, and manager who cant do much about it… not a bad way of making a living!

:laugh:, how about physio/fitness?

:laugh:, i have keeper concerns too, and coaching and management.

At least mark ashton got his ego boosted by dealing with a big club while he pissed all that money up the wall.

agree they arent going anywhere, not sure though that a deal couldnt have been made with pato if he was happy to agree to reduced pay, and if pearson had wanted him,,, but i have my doubts that pato isnt exactly pearsons idea of an attacking midfielder?

I would love to see a tell all story on the last 5 years at city, but its possibly unlikely!! I dont know the inner workings, but i dont know if cod and palmer who already contracted would have been involved in the decision to extend pato,,, unless it was whether either of them can be moved on. I think they have both demonstrated over the years that aside from 1/2 decent games per season, they really offer very little, and its not a great surprise that both are out of favour!?

I dont think there was a stunned reaction to pato going in the summer, he was a decent servant to us, but really, it was his time to move on. I dont think though that this was affected by finances when we were offering contracts to king and simpson and spending 2 million on atkinson and tanner.

I wouldnt disagree with any of that, you could add king to that list for the same reasons as martin i guess

He signed james king simpson atkinson tanner and re-signed baker and weimann. Thats 7. We all know the likes of cod and palmer are a waste of space, but at what point do you think pearson is responsible for the total lack of motivation in our displays? If he takes us down is he not responsible in any way?

I dont even think its about fitness or beep times,,, no one is particularly bothered about competing

Well hes scored a lot of goals in his career, and is a good honest pro, however clearly he isnt going to be getting any quicker, and isnt big enough to dominate big centre backs,,, and it doesnt help that he plays pretty much every minute of every game.

I just cant see anyone wanting to take that salary on in the post covid environment, but like nagy, getting that contract off the books is very appealing!

Have to agree, just a shame hes got a while yet on his contract.

Yes, palmer and cod coming on when we are trying to hold on to a lead is like playing with one less player. the only shame is that benarous and scott are similar style of very young player, potentially competing for 1 spot. If one of them was a centre back, or left back, they might get more of a chance

Would rather see benarous or scott than palmer or odowda

Kinky afternoom at the bear and rugged staff

Thats everyone

Yep! And 30 years later nothing has changed!

We also share facilities with the bears, and their building looks amazing

Agreed, some of our attempts at playing football have been pathetic, kicking it long and playing percentages, badly

Im just glad we are seeing the results of the high performance centre with the high performance standards on the pitch