Jump to content

Welcome to One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums

Welcome to One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums by signing in or creating an account.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Full access to all forums (not all viewable as guest)
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Support OTIB with a premium membership

Delta

Members
  • Content Count

    187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Delta last won the day on March 10

Delta had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

83

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The only problem with that is, it HASN'T been mentioned that he left details with Capaldi. This probably explains why you posted an irrelevant quote rather than one confirming your claim (that it had been mentioned...) The only person who appears to be suggesting that he left details with Capaldi is you. If people could read as well as you'd like us to believe, that would have been the first thing they'd have noticed.
  2. Of course you were talking about me - You're following me around like a little lap dog. Here boy, here boy.
  3. Because unlike Phantom, I have read all the reports. Phantom seems to think there were just Grealish & Capaldi present (he hasn't even taken into consideration that a 3rd person was present taking the photo). It was quite a scene and several people came out after hearing the bumps. I agree that he should be jailed. He won't be because he hasn't been shown to be driving over the legal limit.
  4. Cage rattled? By who? It's funny how many claim Villa fans are deluded whilst ignoring the utter nonsense that is posted on here. Just to be clear, nobody will ever get my cage rattled on an internet forum.
  5. But not intrigued by how Phantom does?
  6. WRONG You have seen him photographed with Tony Capaldi and assumed that is who he left details with. There were several people out and about and if you search hard enough, you will find photographs of Grealish with other people as well.
  7. He left the scene AFTER giving his details: https://thedrivingsolicitor.co.uk/frequently-asked-questions/failing-to-stop-or-report-an-accident-faqs/
  8. Actually, the only thing I was discussing on the coronavirus thread was the right for some self-employed to claim holiday pay and my posts were 100% accurate and correct. I don't have many points wrong and the only thing that is hilarious are the responses. As for the post about Grealish - Let's wait and see what (if anything) he ends up being charged with. Whilst I don't claim to be an expert on criminal law, common sense alone should tell you that if he hasn't been proven to be drink driving then he won't be convicted of it. Furthermore, as he stayed and gave his details when he was asked for them, he has acted correctly in the aftermath.
  9. So there's a few saying "snowflakes" I don't know which Villa forum you're reading but the one I read, nobody is saying that. All teams have a few loose cannons - Why are you trying to make out it's a majority? It's probably less than 1% And if you look at Jack's Twitter page, most of the Man U fans (who think they're signing him) are telling him not to worry and that everything will be fine. I don't see those muppets rushing to display outrage either.
  10. I didn't forget - I was talking about offences committed.
  11. Committed no offence as has not been tested for alcohol, therefore has not failed any test. Left details at the scene so has not left the scene of an accident without making a reasonable effort to disclose contact details. Was not obliged to await police attendance because nobody was injured. In this instance, there was no requirement to inform the police. Possibility of a careless driving charge depending on what CCTV unearths. Here to help.
  12. It could well be the case that this payment will not fall under the parameters of FFP (see Villa's payment to Xia). You would assume that the new owner was aware that this money would have to be paid. With that in mind, you'd think a contingency is in place - Either parachute money or a cash injection directly from the new owner. PS - How much would the McAlpine stadium be worth (dons tin hat).
  13. As far as I'm aware, nothing is in place at this point for the self-employed. If and when something is introduced, it will almost certainly be classed as income and therefore taxable (provided that the worker earns over his personal tax allowance for that year (which is around £12,000 I believe).
  14. You are employed that way because your employer is trying to ensure that they do not have to pay you holiday pay.
  15. What 80%? Do you mean if he receives £80 instead of £100 from the client? Why would he want to do that? Why would he want to evade tax, risk the consequences of doing so, just to save the client £20? He gets £80 either way so obviously, he might just as well receive it through the books - He has nothing to gain by letting the client off £20.
×
×
  • Create New...