sephjnr

How did Harry Cornick get a song from the get-go and has 4 goals total if you include the Forest shootout?

Bit rich for NL.TV to charge a tenner separately for each game instead of one price to watch any of the games on that night.

Make more money for their selves of their own volition including match day revenue. Which - in a similar vein to the EFL selling off online TV to Sky - is now reliant more on handouts from the PL who are DESPERATELY trying to ringfence for their own control even further.

There should have been a provision to guarantee home draws for non-PL teams vs PL. That would be much fairer to increase revenue instead of nebulous donations to 'grass roots', which I suspect is slang for 'bypass the other professional outfits and establish our own training facilities'.

And ****** non-PL teams out of more matchday revenue.

Taunton vs Weston-Super-Mare tomorrow night, if Weston win Taunton are down outright.

Don't let Silvio read this thread, he may put a whack on it.

Cotts himself got sent down to the National League last night as Forest Green can't cover the difference now.

The issue is that it will still be whatever Sky feels like streaming. And the question as to whether or not that revenue granted by the league (instead of taken from customers) can be declared as a mitigator in financial reports is still unanswered.

This is the issue I have - if the delivery is just having more matches for their existing channels then this is not an improvement for the average viewer. If Sky themselves start an on-demand service that can sit alongside or replace either their main broadcasts or NOW then that's an option that wil markedly increase revenue from people who don't want to pay three figures a month. Such was the main way of breaking Sky's dominance for good, and if they've bought the right to it in-house that's one of their main problems no longer being an issue.

In terms of how it can be reported to be FFFP compliant I don't see - at face value - how it's an equivalent. There may be some allowances for this, I don't know.

That's revenue to the EFL itself, not the clubs. It's taking control of the cash directly out of the clubs so I don't see they can report online streaming as revenue in any cases of FFFP questionning.

Source (EFL) Massive step backwards IMO. Way to get people more reliant on Sky's bloated, outdated subscription models. Also taking money directly out of the clubs' pockets.

*googles Adi Dassler's political affiliations* ... ... 0.0

On the bright side, that should ease the demand on Plymouth tickets amirite

NOW WIN THIS GODDAMN GAME

There were only 5 required away games for West Ham, there are 9 here.

By that logic, Plymouth are a bigger club than West Ham. The absolute neck of this club.

Before or after it passes through kidneys?

If the unthinkable happens, would it be the first time a side has got two gaffers sacked from the same club in the same term? DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT WANT THIS. Just checking.

Get in!!

The goal that didn't count for shit, yes. His third goal total for the team which is appalling considering his prominence in the side, and you'd prefer to slate people who point that out instead of actually mitigating it.

Can we please stop playing out from the back when there are 5 players open running downfield?

For a football team stuck in the 70s their fans have a poor grasp of what it was like.