TheReds

The post should turn up to every single one on that basis, then let their fans moan they don't get anything without paying their own manager for information about their club. He's like a little petulant child.

Neville talking about equality, after he happily took a shed load of cash from the Qataris..... Twitter is a cesspit full of absolute morons who just need/want attention. How anyone even thinks it is representative of society in general is beyond me.

One of the best comments ever - and not from an excited fan, an actual employee. It's as if he expected nobody to be able to actually see what they done.... Yet they still listen to this bloke as a truth teller who would never lie to the bestest fans in the World.

Everyone knows he was telling porkies back then and surely a huge red flag as he mentioned "as soon as we have something concrete people will know". He's only ever purchased plastic and canvas since he has been there.

I'm wondering if Wally has done a bit of a brown envelope business deal with the developers, he then sells the majority of his shares to some gullible bloke on the "nearly completed stadium deal" that will bring them untold fortunes, and then bang, "sorry pal, I cannot believe it's fell through".

I'm sure that was where we got off the train and collared by the old bill and taken to an away pub, atmosphere in there was amazing though and the floor was actually bouncing. they must have taken an absolute fortune in a few hours.

And there are City fans thinking they should have had a man advantage long before that even happened, therefore it wouldn't have happened with some competent refereeing in the first place.... Just saying...

Close prediction.

Plenty are not moaning about the goals being disallowed FFS. Are you actually watching it?

I wonder what their wage bill is versus last season? They must be losing even more money and no other revenue streams, and they're not even really investing in any players for the future with resale value. Imagine them going up and needing another new squad, and also on Championship wages, how will they get the players in, and how will FFP work with them. Their top earner must be around 3-4k now.

A few will be fuming reading that....

You have constantly said Hull had best chances (they really never), could've won it TWICE (they really couldn't have), listed their chances to tell us all how apparently great they were etc etc. If you are a City fan then I would be actually shocked how anyone can be so negative after that overall very decent performance. If you really are a City fan and are this negative after a performance like that then I suggest you get another hobby. I'll tap out now.

Wells just offside for an equaliser, Williams should've scored, Sykes, Knight header, Wells overhead kick, Cornick (probably should've passed imo). I guess they don't count and we should've just conceded all of your examples. Jeez. I've never seen anyone post so negatively after an overall decent performance, come from a goal down away from home, and one where if one of the teams deserved to get the 3 points it was us.

Are you really a City fan? I mean we have some negative posters on here, but **** me you seem to be on another level. Could've conceded 4 or 5, Hull missed best chances, Hull could've won it twice. Did you watch the game looking at the radio?

They should refuse the planning and make them go to appeal just for the attitude they have shown towards everyone involved from the residents to the planners. Plus it would be funny.

I love this type of deal, you get to know what he's like on and off the pitch, what he brings or doesn't bring, and can send him back and option to buy with an already agreed fee. As long as he isn't a Tomlin (and nothing to show he is), then it's a great deal imo.

Also made an important block at 0-0 last week before our winner. Other than that though, some very sad people need to have someone they can direct their anger at, it seems they want that person to be Cornick regardless of his contribution.

So how do bookies get away with passing personal information to other bookies of punters that are simply beating them but doing nothing unlawful? The same with photos being passed around, albeit only within that company, I guess this is actually legal?

Let's just say they do manage to get up this season, then where do they stand? They will have hardly any players as you have stated, old ones will be gone, young ones will be gone back. They then have to try and buy players capable or even get some freebies, do they even know what the wage costs are for the Championship? They will not be getting any more revenue this season than last season, they have no other revenue streams in that effort of a stadium, so how do they pay for a promotion and just one season in the Championship? They will end up with even more debt and the cycle continues the year after. Add in the fact they don't really have any players worth a fortune so not really got anything to trade, and no youngsters from the academy going through their ranks. They may well have a good season, they may even surprise and get promoted, but whatever happens they will be getting into a hell of a lot more debt, and how much more will the owners keep ploughing in?

I would say he probably is screwed as naming him from their point of view is surely a bit of a risk, but I was just pointing out that the same thing happens all the time with the bookies claiming all sorts of stuff, and doing what they can to void bets. I mean how do they know the people betting are connected to the player, how would they? Unless they all have the same surname, family name, agent name - if they have then they really are dumb? They may well have all the evidence they need, I'm certainly not saying they haven't.

I don't know how they stand with GDPR rules in general, because they will happily pass on customers information between different firms and will send cctv photos around their own shops of people they don't want betting with them (assume the internal photo sending is legal though). Bookies want it all one way, I struggle to get £10. £20 on a horse race but how much can I have on the slots, roulette, blackjack etc - as much as I want. Plenty of stories out there where they wait until the result of a race, football match etc and then they void them for "betting patterns". Betfred and the Accrington Stanley game from a few years ago spring to mind as . We are also at the point where you try to withdraw winnings and then they want you to take selfies with your passport etc or they won't pay you, It's all for verification purposes, yet they don't ask when you are giving them the money in the first place. I have no issue with identification of everyone before they take a bet but not after, now some have to prove where the income comes from and it makes no sense with the actual rules they use. I don't think the sponsorship is the worst thing, it's the adverts before, during and after the games that rake in the money and gets people hooked and people betting in the pubs whilst drinking.

Initial analysis showed that on that day several new accounts were created at Betway, account linked with people close to Paqueta, with users depositing the maximum amount allowed. These accounts made a married bet to increase the winnings: the authors would only receive the money if Paquetá took yellow against Villa and if the striker Luiz Henrique, from Betis, received the card against Villarreal, on the same day on March 12. As a betting man who has had some fairly decent wagers over the years, that statement is just something all betting firms would use, and it looks worse to someone looking in. How does Betway even know these people are close to the player - same Country, agents, friends names, social media? As for the maximum stakes allowed, I would say with a new account the limits would be tiny, nobody would be getting on tens of thousands, be lucky to get a couple of hundred on. It could easily be someone who had a view on a bet and to get anything fairly decent on, multiple accounts are used (but still only one punter). I used to bet the same horses with about 25 different accounts, nothing dodgy on the betting front so to speak, just to try and get the money on. Not to say he isn't guilty mind, but Betway would have systems in place to pick up any strange betting activity and could easily void the bets before they even start, I would guess they let them all run hoping they would either lose and keep the money, or wait and if they won then they void the bets and not payout any winnings.

His surname wasn't Phillips was it.... He was on here not long ago, and sounds just like your old friend.

Nailed it.

Aren't you forgetting something, it must surely be finished by then....