Henry

I think this is quite a bad take. I think the truck driver has the worse luck. Chair playing isn’t why we lost the game.

I sort of agree and to be fair, I think @Davefevs has said he isn’t fussed about the styles as long as we win. Gary Johnson’s football wasn’t always slick but the promotion and play off season wears a brilliant time to be a fan. (Unless you are @Robbored.)

Not showing as sold out to me.

Who is in charge of retail? It just continues to baffle me.

I’ve been critical on the SC&T but your efforts and communication, via the forum, has been a lot better recently. However, this is about the club. A lot of the responses they gave you last time were poor or just fobbing off. I appreciate some were written so it was difficult for you to press.

Hamstring Ping Centre strikes again. Bloody Rennie and Pearson, they should be replaced.

Read the Gary Johnson/Robbored in the classics section - that explain how @Robbored knows!

If he was less fit than Sykes, he must be crutches. If he’s not fit to come on, then don’t include him.

What is the point of having a £5m play maker on the bench and not using him? Absolute madness.

The club have flirted with having an older, experienced CM (Hartley, O’Neil, Brunt) for years. For once, they got it right with James. It would be madness not to have the conversation with him. We saw how badly it went when we tried replacing Pack and Smith at once.

It was a good finish, those sort of chances are easy to spoon. What made it easier was the ‘out and in’ run by Wells to create the space. Then the ball from McCorie that was flat, pacy and on Cornicks step.

Nah, Rodney Trotter said that first.

If you’re that concerned, go look at his posting history.

I’m in love with the girl next door…

Yawn.

No he didn’t. You’ve repeated that line several times over the years and you’ve been shown he didn’t say it.

I’m not sure why @Davefevs is getting so much stick. He’s the one of the most balanced posters and rarely posts based on emotion. Call it what you want, the formation/shape/game plan, the change didn’t work. It invited pressure on to us. It made us look like Everton v Man City. Whats more frustrating, when we are losing a game (still not over Leeds) Manning doesn’t even tweak things, let alone completely change things to get a result. Delighted with the result, but Mannings in game play still remains poor.

Based on this game, Wells is first choice. Conway has barely moved.

If we don’t win this game, it’s firmly on Manning. There was no need to go 5 at the back.

How do you know?

Is there much point in that section anymore? It seems a lot of questions are answered by yourself, which is a good thing on your part.

I wouldn’t advise in this window. They keep the windows and doors open all year round…

From some of the opinions that are aired, I highly doubt it’s the first.

That would require ambition and a plan.

That would be peak Manning…and probably the most likely plan.