phillybuk Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 I was under the impression it was our defence we had to sort out?! That is our defence to score more goals than them as we can't keep clean sheets, :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 I like Harewood's enthusiasm and passion but if he is to start it has to be with a mobile striker. Obviously JET can't be dropped at present so it's very tough to fit Harewood in as I don't think him alone would work with JET. It looked OK against the gash but nothing more. I still think we need a bit of genuine pace in the side to turn teams around. Baldock is nimble but doesn't have great pace in my opinion. I think sometimes we need a different option. I must admit I have been a bit disappointed not to have seen more of Wes Burns. Young, busy and has electric pace. Of course he is inexperienced and isn't the 'answer' as such but it's a different option. Why not bring him on every now and then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiale Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 I really want us to improve as a passing free flowering attacking side and stop the long ball crap. So I am against anything that will make the long ball option easier (and if anything will encourage it more). Play to our strengths, we created against Bradford, wolves, Coventry.. So let's work and improve on that.. We score goals and create chances, it's the defending that needs work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 harewood will never be the answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djb6162 Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 I like Harewood's enthusiasm and passion but if he is to start it has to be with a mobile striker. Obviously JET can't be dropped at present so it's very tough to fit Harewood in as I don't think him alone would work with JET. It looked OK against the gash but nothing more. I still think we need a bit of genuine pace in the side to turn teams around. Baldock is nimble but doesn't have great pace in my opinion. I think sometimes we need a different option. I must admit I have been a bit disappointed not to have seen more of Wes Burns. Young, busy and has electric pace. Of course he is inexperienced and isn't the 'answer' as such but it's a different option. Why not bring him on every now and then? 630 minutes on the bench, 0 minutes on the field last 7 games Either do as you suggest or take him off the bench ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 630 minutes on the bench, 0 minutes on the field last 7 games Either do as you suggest or take him off the bench ? Wow that many? For me he doesn't even have to come on up front if he doesn't want to take off Baldock etc he could even come on right wing for Wagstaff. If we are going to go direct we may as well over hit it and turn teams around by getting Wes to run the channels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap flinger Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 I think we have to start Baldock and Harewood against Colchester, time to start with two strikers as Baldock will get much more joy working off the big man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red white and red Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 Should play 4-3-1-2 with JET as no.10 and Harewood and Baldock up front, would bang 'em in! Maybe we would, but we cannot defend so we may score 3 but concede 4, same old same old pal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 Diamond? Do we have another holding midfielder apart from Wynter, well suppose Elliott could do the role. ...............................Parish (deserves a chance) Moloney.........Flint.............Williams........Cunningham/Shorey .........................Wynter/Elliott ...Wagstaff...........................................Bryan ................................JET ...................Baldock......Harewood Play the 2 wide midfielders a little narrower so we're not over run in the centre of the pitch, Cunningham/Shorey and Moloney can cover. Just a thought. Don't dislike this. It would work better with Pack where you've put Elliott/Wynter - and even better when Liam Kelly returns. Prefer Shorey to Cunningham TBH as Greg seems a sahadow of himself this season. Maybe he was hoping to be snapped up by a Championship club this summer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 Not sure about Harewood but amazed the debate on here hasn't talked more about the defence (not the choice of goalkeeper, I've seen plenty on here about that). For what it is worth I'm not too bothered whether Harewood starts or Baldock does though I'd probably stick with the latter, however JET has to play and for me that means both of the other two cannot. We therefore need to find a midfield and back four that makes us look like we've at least mastered the basic elements of defending. Let's sort out how to keep the opposition out, or at least down to scoring the sort of numbers that we have a chance of equalling or exceeding though, you might win 2-1 often, you'll rarely win 4-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red white and red Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 Don't dislike this. It would work better with Pack where you've put Elliott/Wynter - and even better when Liam Kelly returns. Prefer Shorey to Cunningham TBH as Greg seems a sahadow of himself this season. Maybe he was hoping to be snapped up by a Championship club this summer? Can't plan for anything with Kelly, the guy will be out for months yet and we could be relegated by then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 harewood will never be the answer This, in a nutshell. We really do need a James Vaughan type striker, strong, can hold the ball up, mobile and score goals But they cost a lot of money.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoingUp Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 Think harewood will start against the saints and rest baldock for saturdays game.if harewoods not match fit to start maybe even a chance for burns to get a look in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 Can't plan for anything with Kelly, the guy will be out for months yet and we could be relegated by then We can but hope the November return that was talked about is true. A solid defensive midfielder in front of our wobbly back 4 is something we desperately miss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 harewood will never be the answer If the question was, what would be good jugged, it would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.