Jump to content

Official Match Day Thread - Bristol City Vs Rotherham


ciderbeans

Recommended Posts

#BristolCity v Rotherham: Parish; Moloney, Flint, Williams, Cunningham; Wagstaff, Elliott, Gillett, Bryan; Baldock, Emmanuel-Thomas.

#BristolCity subs: Fielding, Carey, Shorey, Reid, Pack, Burns, Taylor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what happened to this midfield diamond then?

 

We don't have to stick to the same formation every time?

 

Also, Gillett could be playing the JET role, and JET the Taylor role. I imagine we are 4-4-2 though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does everyone assume we're going to play a diamond every week?! It's infuriating to read. SC clearly stated that he chose the diamond against Tamworth as a tactical option because of their height and strength to try and protect the back four but also give JEt some space in the pocket. That doesn't mean it's his favoured formation or that we'll play it every week.

Gillett may well be in the JET role and JET in the Taylor role today, but it looks more like a straight 4-4-2 to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does everyone assume we're going to play a diamond every week?! It's infuriating to read. SC clearly stated that he chose the diamond against Tamworth as a tactical option because of their height and strength to try and protect the back four but also give JEt some space in the pocket. That doesn't mean it's his favoured formation or that we'll play it every week.

Gillett may well be in the JET role and JET in the Taylor role today, but it looks more like a straight 4-4-2 to me.

 

Nobody has assumed anything as far as I can see so far on this thread, apart from the line up as printed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strikingly similar to a SOD lineup that

 

Except the blind loyalty shown to Shorey has seemingly been halted. The widemen will presumably get wide, rather than operate more centrally as they did under SO'D. So on paper it looks similar but it'll be a Cotterill team in the way that it plays. 2 very different 4-4-2's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He drilled on and on and on about playing 2 up top and now he's playing Baldock upfront by himself again. The same thing that hasn't worked all season.

What was the definition of insanity again?

 

Where does it say that JET won't be playing up front. The twitter team sheet clearly has a semi-colon between the midfield and the attack. Baldock and JET up top is what it suggests. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He drilled on and on and on about playing 2 up top and now he's playing Baldock upfront by himself again. The same thing that hasn't worked all season.

What was the definition of insanity again?

Were you sat in on the team talk?

If not why don't you wait and see what is happening before moaning even before a ball has been kicked in anger...

Indeed what is the definition of insanity!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of it.

 

For goodness sake man! no time no inclination. oh just for you then..

 

Question?.. what did the board say? .. they wanted seamless transition right?  - that should cover the first point.

 

head against wall?... board say they listen ... got it?

 

Or have you been wasting my time and just being very sarcastic?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For goodness sake man! no time no inclination. oh just for you then..

 

Question?.. what did the board say? .. they wanted seamless transition right?  - that should cover the first point.

 

head against wall?... board say they listen ... got it?

 

Or have you been wasting my time and just being very sarcastic?

 

Me being sarcastic?, who is hoof?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...