HoldenBall Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 No, it was Barnett (http://www.bcfc.co.uk/fixtures-results/match-report/index.aspx?matchid=3517996). Be interesting to see how they interact. Was a bad, bad challenge. Footballers have memories like gold fish, there will be no problems at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 I don't have a clue tbh - hoping better tacticians than I will chip in. But, as someone else said - does this mean someone is in for JET? Not sure. Always good to have an extra club in the bag as they say. We have little attacking wise on the bench at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperRed Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 What makes you think he'll play all 3? One's captain, the other is our standout player, and I can't imagine Barnett will come here to sit on the bench if he's getting game time at Peterborough or has options elsewhere. Perhaps I'm reading too much into it, but based on the team Cotterill played in his first game at Tamworth (Taylor starting) it may be that he wants to play two up front but wasn't confident in Taylor's ability so had to drop that until he could bring someone else in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 He also tore us apart when we lost to crawley 1-0 in the fa cup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 One's captain, the other is our standout player, and I can't imagine Barnett will come here to sit on the bench if he's getting game time at Peterborough or has options elsewhere. Perhaps I'm reading too much into it, but based on the team Cotterill played in his first game at Tamworth (Taylor starting) it may be that he wants to play two up front but wasn't confident in Taylor's ability so had to drop that until he could bring someone else in. SC is now the third manager to come to this conclusion. Don't wish to lay into the lad but surely SURELY if this transfer goes through Taylor will get shipped out on loan or otherwise? He's behind a teenager in the squad now, he's gotta know he's done here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red white and red Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 If this goes through, that's a good signing, big physical presence up front, allows JET to do his thing behind baldock and Barnett! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EDoubleD Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 Didn't Barnett play when we lost to Crawley in the cup under Del? Thought he looked ok that day. Got the best out of Matt tubbs, who's pretty similar to baldock. Just a big mobile striker. Only issue for me is personality. He's one of the ones ferguson tried to bin off when him, Zakuani and that other lad went on a p!ss up after they lost. Wonder if he'll shove jet out wide now? Any news on Myrie-Williams? Or was that just rumours? Shame on Taylor. Always thought he looked useful. At cov he changed the game when he came on. Never lost a header and had an ok touch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 Didn't Barnett play when we lost to Crawley in the cup under Del? Thought he looked ok that day. Got the best out of Matt tubbs, who's pretty similar to baldock. Just a big mobile striker. Only issue for me is personality. He's one of the ones ferguson tried to bin off when him, Zakuani and that other lad went on a p!ss up after they lost. Wonder if he'll shove jet out wide now? Considering he's spoken at length about making JET stay more central, I really don't see that happening. Ipswich and Cardiff tried to do that; both failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 Have people forgotten where we are again?? Who did people expect to sign then? Yes his attitude might be questionable but if SC can get the best out if him we have a player on our hands. Exactly the type of striker we need. Absolutely no risk either as it's only on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 jet would be given licence to roam about behind the front two in a free role like he did against tamworth when he was the best defender and attacker on the pitch imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EDoubleD Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16371525 Here's the game. Interesting out of our 16 man squad only 1 player still playing for us is Carey. Not counting Pearson as he probably won't play again. Shows how much we've changed in 2 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Man Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 If confirmed this has to be the end for Taylor? Loan until the end of the season then released? Could be a good fit for the Blue Few, though if it means they evade slipping through the trap door I would rather we kept him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 If confirmed this has to be the end for Taylor? Loan until the end of the season then released? Could be a good fit for the Blue Few, though if it means they evade slipping through the trap door I would rather we kept him. We can only hope! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strictly Obi Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 My worry is he is being lined up to replace jet. Hope there is no deal for a cash plus player deal after initial loan spell. I get the feeling Cottrell doesn't rate jet as much as sod! Hope I'm wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 A player that divides fans' opinions. He should fit in perfectly at City! If Jesus Christ signed for City, some people would still say he only got the job because of his Dad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid in the Riot Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 My worry is he is being lined up to replace jet. Hope there is no deal for a cash plus player deal after initial loan spell. I get the feeling Cottrell doesn't rate jet as much as sod! Hope I'm wrong! Can't see JET going. If SC is going to play Baldock, JET and Barnett then I worry most for Bobby. Don't see where he fits in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 My worry is he is being lined up to replace jet. Hope there is no deal for a cash plus player deal after initial loan spell. I get the feeling Cottrell doesn't rate jet as much as sod! Hope I'm wrong! what gives you that feeling, jet has played every game under SC, if he didn't rate him he wouldn't play him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 what gives you that feeling, jet has played every game under SC, if he didn't rate him he wouldn't play him I'm sure SC does rate him, but the decision to sell JET won't be made by Cotterill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat Fastard Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 A 6ft 3in heaver up-front would be in keeping with SCs "Land of the Giants" reputation that he had at Cheltenham. If he also signed 6ft Myrie Williams then I assume he would not play Joe or Bobby very often. That would seem to run counter to at least one of the five pillars. I, for one, think that Bobby and Joe are two of our best players and the only local lads in the team. If we don't push these two talents then why bother with an academy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider red Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 A 6ft 3in heaver up-front would be in keeping with SCs "Land of the Giants" reputation that he had at Cheltenham. If he also signed 6ft Myrie Williams then I assume he would not play Joe or Bobby very often. That would seem to run counter to at least one of the five pillars. I, for one, think that Bobby and Joe are two of our best players and the only local lads in the team. If we don't push these two talents then why bother with an academy? How have you come to this conclusion when he has started Reid in every game and praised Bryan? Seems like people want to moan for things that haven't happened yet! The signs are good for cotts bringing in the youth IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad blit Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 Interesting to read couple Ipswich fans opinions on Barnett... "On another note, Tyrone Barnett had a few good touches and his hold-up play was decent" (someone who watched Rotherham v Posh in Sept) "I was disappointed that his loan spell was curtailed, he looked a handy player in his short spell here" I dont think his signing would mean the end of any player, we just dont have many options upfront and you do need 'different clubs in the bag' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 A 6ft 3in heaver up-front would be in keeping with SCs "Land of the Giants" reputation that he had at Cheltenham. If he also signed 6ft Myrie Williams then I assume he would not play Joe or Bobby very often. That would seem to run counter to at least one of the five pillars. I, for one, think that Bobby and Joe are two of our best players and the only local lads in the team. If we don't push these two talents then why bother with an academy? complete tripe, What about Wes Burns? he's coming off the bench quite a lot, and what sort of Target men do with have in the acadmey? because I don't think we have a single one, We have no physical pressence up front and need one and this lad would fit the bill all be it only on loan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamite Red Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 .........................................................................PARISH............................................................................. .................................OSBORNE.........................FLINT.......................WILLIAMS..................................... MOLONEY...................................REID............................GILLET.................................CUNNINGHAM.......................... .........................................................................JET................................................................................................. ...............................................BARNETT......................................BALDOCK............................................................. Swapping Reid for Pack or Elliott away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strictly Obi Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 what gives you that feeling, jet has played every game under SC, if he didn't rate him he wouldn't play himDidn't say he didn't rate him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 .........................................................................PARISH............................................................................. .................................OSBORNE.........................FLINT.......................WILLIAMS..................................... MOLONEY...................................REID............................GILLET.................................CUNNINGHAM.......................... .........................................................................JET................................................................................................. ...............................................BARNETT......................................BALDOCK............................................................. Swapping Reid for Pack or Elliott away. If we play this at Wolves we will get destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Orns Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 If we play this at Wolves we will get destroyed. Wolves would destroy us if we had 15 players out there, and that included Messi & Ronaldo It's the law - City never beat Wolves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Watts Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 If Jesus Christ signed for City, some people would still say he only got the job because of his Dad Only if he was signed as a keeper....I hear he's static on crosses. Anyway - where did you hear that we were linked with him......?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hippy273 Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 First things first, shake hands and make up with Cunningham, "I'm so sorry, the gaffer told me to get stuck in in the second half". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 taken from twitter: shit if you want to play good football, perfect for hoofball. Slow and lazy. On his day he looks a quality player, when its not his day then he can be bloody awful I can't believe my eyes, people want TYRONE BARNETT at their club, hahaha! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider red Posted January 6, 2014 Report Share Posted January 6, 2014 If we play this at Wolves we will get destroyed. Disagree wolves look poor at the moment, if we go at them they are beatable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.