BcFcOneLove Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 Just read his post match interview on mkdons.com and he's saying that his side deserved all 3 points! He fails to mention we should have been 4-0 up before their first goal. Yes they played better second half but it can't just be me that thinks this guy is deluded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob k Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I wonder just how big his head will eventually get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loco Rojo Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 Im not sure he is. Yes we could have been ahead early but they had chances to bury it in the second too when through on goal. Im relieved we got the draw but if i was in their shoes today i would have seen that as 3 points dropped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BcFcOneLove Posted January 18, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 If I was in their shoes today I would have in disbelief that my team was 2-0 up at half time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfctim Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 You can see why he'd say that after going in at ht 2-0 up, but really 2-0 the other way round would've flattered them. It was more even after the break in terms of chances but we still had the better of it and even at 2-2 had several chances to seal it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Jordan Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I quite enjoyed his interview on the City Youtube page. Disagree with him over them being the better side, but he seems fairly level-headed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCbTUrSsXUo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 They had a free header because of our woeful defending at (I think) 2-0 up which would have put us out of the game, so he kind of has a point. On the other hand at 2-2 we looked the only side likely to score again really. Strange game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy1968 Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 Look at the second half chances. They should have had 2 or 3 more goals. And they certainly had the measure of our defence. Apart from the first 10 minutes I'd say MKDons were the better side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxford Red Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I really enjoyed his interview then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BcFcOneLove Posted January 18, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I must say having watched that, he comes across a lot more honest than the website article portrays! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I thought there forwards were very lively and ran our defenders ragged, but there defence was shocking all afternoon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUTOR Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 He also said we're a great club with great fans who deserve to be a lit higher than we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Man Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 We were wide open second half because we were chasing the game, that's why they created chances. We score first and we can close up the midfield, they score and we have to open up. One or two up after 10 minutes and we could have sat back and hit them on the break, simple. We were the better side and at no stage did we deserve to lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I'd say MKDons were the better side. AND.......I wouldn't ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City1970 Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I thought there forwards were very lively and ran our defenders ragged, but there defence was shocking all afternoon. A bit like our defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolas Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 I especially like Mr Robinsons quote of apart from the goals they didnt have any chances. Spot of Alzheimers there mr blinkers robinson. Your boys were fortunate not to be atleast 4 down at HT. Isnt it funny how everyone watches the same game but in making comments clearly havent really watched it! About 7-4 to us wouldve been a fair reflection! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldie Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 Looked like he was applying for a job here at some time in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 Let's be honest - a draw was probably fair. We could have been 3-0 at half-time but also could have been 3 down. 2nd half again both sides had chances. I think we had 16 shots to their 13 so again that shows it was fairly close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted January 18, 2014 Report Share Posted January 18, 2014 Double Post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swede Posted January 19, 2014 Report Share Posted January 19, 2014 I completely disagree. We had at least FIVE guilt edged chances in the first half alone and should have been three up inside ten minutes such was our dominance. If they go in their heads drop The fact that our midfielders constantly didn't track their runners from midfield with Pack the worst culprit gave them a toe hold back into a game they were looking to get a right tonking in. With us chasing the game we were a lot more open at the back but there was a growing feeling that we'd open them up every time we attacked. Their manager is talking out his rear. They were slowing the game down, their keeper got booked for time wasting and they didn't seem to be in any hurry even when we pegged them back to 2.2. I'm actually disappointed we didn't get the winner rather than relieved we got the draw such is the optimism now being generated by Cotts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bemmyredjeff Posted January 19, 2014 Report Share Posted January 19, 2014 You can see why he'd say that after going in at ht 2-0 up, but really 2-0 the other way round would've flattered them. It was more even after the break in terms of chances but we still had the better of it and even at 2-2 had several chances to seal it. After we levelled only one team really looked like winning it as they slowed the game down for a spell and took the wind out of our sails. Did you miss the gilt edged chances they had in the closing stages plus flints fantastic diving header that went inches over the bar. City's weakness is that they are not capable of grabbing a game by the scruff of its neck and controlling it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O'Garlandinho Posted January 19, 2014 Report Share Posted January 19, 2014 I think City deserved the win yesterday, based on the chances we had in the 1st half, i was amazed how we didn't score! MK had chances too but apart from the 2 good finishes, nothing as clear-cut as ours. Saying that, at 2-0 down i'm very happy with the point, and we nearly lost it at the end when Parish fumbled that powerful drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderJar Posted January 19, 2014 Report Share Posted January 19, 2014 Im not sure he is. Yes we could have been ahead early but they had chances to bury it in the second too when through on goal. Im relieved we got the draw but if i was in their shoes today i would have seen that as 3 points dropped. If they somehow saw it as 3 points dropped they really are deluded, they did get a point after all, 3 more would make 4, and that never seemed likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Peacock Posted January 19, 2014 Report Share Posted January 19, 2014 We should have won 8-6, so I think we were on balance the better side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.