TV Tom Posted February 4, 2014 Report Share Posted February 4, 2014 That wasn't good to hear the cheering as he left the pitch. On saturday in a flat back four he looked far more assured with flint. A pity Thomas wasn't subbed, who would have deserved sarcastic cheers for yet another aimless lazy pathetic performance. Sorry , but the sooner i see the back of him the better. Bryan like Reid, another of our great academy products who looks totally out of his depth and lacking any fight....for a local lad. Barnett and burns not starting was the biggest cock up of many tonight, he should have swallowed his pride and bit the bullet with 352. Why should Barnett have started? shown absolutely nothing yet to warrant starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted February 4, 2014 Report Share Posted February 4, 2014 That wasn't good to hear the cheering as he left the pitch. On saturday in a flat back four he looked far more assured with flint. A pity Thomas wasn't subbed, who would have deserved sarcastic cheers for yet another aimless lazy pathetic performance. Sorry , but the sooner i see the back of him the better. Bryan like Reid, another of our great academy products who looks totally out of his depth and lacking any fight....for a local lad. Barnett and burns not starting was the biggest cock up of many tonight, he should have swallowed his pride and bit the bullet with 352. Barnett started at Brentford and was shit. Showed absolutely no signs of a man desperate to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bemmyredjeff Posted February 4, 2014 Report Share Posted February 4, 2014 Barnett started at Brentford and was shit. Showed absolutely no signs of a man desperate to play. And JET has ? He is an absolute disgrace to his profession. If ever a player has shown a total lack of interest and effort for a game...then he is your man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshtonGreat Posted February 4, 2014 Report Share Posted February 4, 2014 And JET has ? He is an absolute disgrace to his profession. If ever a player has shown a total lack of interest and effort for a game...then he is your man. JET is certainly not a man for a fight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TV Tom Posted February 4, 2014 Report Share Posted February 4, 2014 And JET has ? He is an absolute disgrace to his profession. If ever a player has shown a total lack of interest and effort for a game...then he is your man. Don't think Barnett is the answer though and seeing as there is no other strikers at the club i would keep our 18 goal top scorer in the line-up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted February 4, 2014 Report Share Posted February 4, 2014 And JET has ? He is an absolute disgrace to his profession. If ever a player has shown a total lack of interest and effort for a game...then he is your man. JET has been off form the last few weeks but a disgrace to his profession? Give over. 18 goals and 13/14 assists? Granted he doesn't always bust a gut as such, certainly didn't tonight but that's a complete over reaction. Apparently JET is a model pro. You say he's a disgrace to his profession yet call for his replacement in Barnett, who was fined at Posh for a night out on the piss when he wasn't meant to? That a disgrace to his profession too? Surely he can't be expected to win us games every week? Other players have to show some balls. At least JET tries things. Tyrone Barnett could not trap a bag of cement at Brentford. Most of the 'hard work' he has done off the ball in his time here is because he is chasing back after a crap touch or losing the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bemmyredjeff Posted February 4, 2014 Report Share Posted February 4, 2014 Don't think Barnett is the answer though and seeing as there is no other strikers at the club i would keep our 18 goal top scorer in the line-up It all sums up a very sad state of affairs at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsquirrel Posted February 4, 2014 Report Share Posted February 4, 2014 i would like to know when the rest of the team will learn that any ball over 6 inches above the ground will not reach baldock. at least if a ball is lumped forward much lower down,he has half a chance of nicking it away and getting through. a few positives tonight tho,first real show ive witnessed from wes burns,now i know what people mean,i also took note of packs level headedness,rarely put a foot wrong and flinty,my mom,a few dodgy moments with the ball at his feet but didnt get caught once and wasnt scared to put his head in at boot height Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 just heard cotts interview,afraid to say rabbit in the headlights. he's not going to be the man to get us out of this shit Hello. 3 at the back tells us all we need to know really.. in the space of a week those who did not know now should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.