Silvio Dante Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, Tammys Scan said: I wouldn't, if he managed to keep us up I'd want him gone still. Terrible record, hugely underachieved ie money spent, get someone better in that can do a good job. Edit: Unless you mean reassessing as in manager too. I did mean in manager too for avoidance of doubt! However if he wins 12 on the bounce from hereon (ok...) then I know how fickle things are - like it or not there would be a shift. What you won't agree with is what I've said elsewhere - I think there is a decent coach in there somewhere. But I agree, absent something like the above, even if staying up, he's likely and rightly gone in the next couple of months Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B block Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 6 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said: I did mean in manager too for avoidance of doubt! However if he wins 12 on the bounce from hereon (ok...) then I know how fickle things are - like it or not there would be a shift. What you won't agree with is what I've said elsewhere - I think there is a decent coach in there somewhere. But I agree, absent something like the above, even if staying up, he's likely and rightly gone in the next couple of months If he stays were down simple as in my book, all the evidence baring an act of God points to him not turning this around, whatever stat you want to use,points gained,players used etc. The only evidence for him staying and us staying up is hope, is he Alan dicks reincarnated, is he the new Eddie Howe? i hate watching city lose but if I knew he'd be gone if we lost Saturday I'd bite your hand off and gamble on pemberton, rowett or Bruce bleedin Forsyth to keep us up rather than a man who speaks like he's reading from George orwells 1984. I understand those who can't bare their team losing but the lesser evil the greater good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedKatieScarlett Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 Why don't the poll figures total the number of people showing having voted for either option? A discrepancy of about 20 at the moment... no space for " spoilt papers" so don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted March 3, 2017 Admin Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 8 hours ago, RedKatieScarlett said: Why don't the poll figures total the number of people showing having voted for either option? A discrepancy of about 20 at the moment... no space for " spoilt papers" so don't get it. Am confused, what discrepancy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clint Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 I'd take the 3 points as I still think he'll be here win, loose or draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ska Junkie Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 8 hours ago, RedKatieScarlett said: Why don't the poll figures total the number of people showing having voted for either option? A discrepancy of about 20 at the moment... no space for " spoilt papers" so don't get it. Not the foggiest idea RKS. I certainly haven't deleted any and don't even know if I could. 149 votes yet it shows just 124. No idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedKatieScarlett Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 Phantom- the poll says 149 members have voted, then under the percentages there is a little person symbol which I'm presuming means the number of people contributing to that percentage. These say 51 and 73 which my poor maths makes 124... so where are the other 25??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 27 minutes ago, RedKatieScarlett said: Phantom- the poll says 149 members have voted, then under the percentages there is a little person symbol which I'm presuming means the number of people contributing to that percentage. These say 51 and 73 which my poor maths makes 124... so where are the other 25??? I would assume the remainder from the first number are posters like myself , who havn't voted , but viewed the vote results (After which you can't vote) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ska Junkie Posted March 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said: I would assume the remainder from the first number are posters like myself , who havn't voted , but viewed the vote results (After which you can't vote) That makes sense Bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 1 minute ago, 8menhadadream said: That makes sense Bob. Which is probably more than I do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.