Jump to content

International Cricket


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Lrrr said:

Chris Woakes, unluckiest player in test history? Has a better average than Broad and Anderson with the ball in England, good with the bat, how many test wickets would he have if he’d been allowed the new ball his whole career? 

Very good bowler but better average than those two doesn’t make him a better bowler than them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stokes' absence makes team selection very tricky for the next test, think we will go for:












Alternatively Root could bat at 3 and Dan Lawrence slots in instead of Crawley but bats below Pope in the order, also Root could play himself as the main spinner to fit a fourth seamer in but also allwo Crawley & Lawrence to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Lrrr said:

I think Archer will stay in and miss 3rd test with a returning Jimmy

  1. Burns
  2. Sibley
  3. Crawley
  4. Root
  5. Pope
  6. Buttler
  7. Woakes
  8. Curran
  9. Bess
  10. Broad
  11. Archer

Just shows the vast number of options we have in the bowling department at the moment, could really do with Burns and Crawley (if it is him) making decent scores in the next test to show that the batting department is well stocked too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...