The Gasbuster Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 26 minutes ago, chipdawg said: Kirsty was dealt with in a court of law, Keys and Gray by their employers. So she didn't "get away with it" at all. Personally I'd rather be in shit with my boss than with a magistrate To be honest, I think Sky were looking for a reason to get rid of them No reason for her employers not to sack her directly afterwards, though. Rooney likely to be fined the maximum by his employers, after being charged. No mention of any punishment from Gallagher's employers ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Port Said Red Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 2 hours ago, Esmond Million's Bung said: Well let's be honest he has never been somebody who has ever admitted his own guilt on the pitch, it was always somebody else's fault. That's not strictly trur EMB, he did say in an interview that it was right that he should be dropped, but that was immediately siezed on as being fake news by the ITK's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 They were never going to sack Kirsty. There's probably an enormous number of sad sacks who watch SSN just because she's on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiderEyed Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 Can someone better versed in the law of the land tell me what he's likely to get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, ZiderEyed said: Can someone better versed in the law of the land tell me what he's likely to get? Divorced Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Horsman Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 7 minutes ago, ZiderEyed said: Can someone better versed in the law of the land tell me what he's likely to get? A ******* huge legal bill from his barrister........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipdawg Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 12 minutes ago, Esmond Million's Bung said: I doubt it but we will never know, well until the next time it happens of course. I still cannot get beyond 3 times over the limit (especially in her case 11am and picking her kids up) that the ban or the overall punishment is sufficient. I always find the idea that a mega-corporation like Sky give a damn whether the individual in question in cases like these has breasts or not quite amusing. They don't care what's between the persons legs, they care about whether that person still has value to them after whatever scandal has played out. Gallagher evidently had value. Keys and Gray did not. I agree that what she did was pretty high up the scale of asshole, but that was dealt with by the courts for better or for worse. Once she retained her liberty, the only thing that will have mattered was $$$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipdawg Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 16 minutes ago, The Gasbuster said: No reason for her employers not to sack her directly afterwards, though. Rooney likely to be fined the maximum by his employers, after being charged. No mention of any punishment from Gallagher's employers ? Evidently they felt she still had value as an asset to that employer. Rooney ain't gonna get sacked by Everton, is he? Same thing really. Companies like Sky only take a moral view when he suits the business model Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gasbuster Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, chipdawg said: Evidently they felt she still had value as an asset to that employer. Rooney ain't gonna get sacked by Everton, is he? Same thing really. Companies like Sky only take a moral view when he suits the business model On that we can agree ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazooka Joe Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 6 hours ago, BRISTOL86 said: Driving or diving? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazooka Joe Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 48 minutes ago, GasDestroyer said: The suit looks bloody tight on Tomlin (:laugh:) Why the hell did he buy XXL when he could have got XXXL for the same price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Septic Peg Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 18 minutes ago, ZiderEyed said: Can someone better versed in the law of the land tell me what he's likely to get? Not versed in law but the fact the magistrate has sent it to the Crown Court and that LT hasn't entered a plea at this first stage, doesn't bode well should he be found/admit guilt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiderEyed Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, Septic Peg said: Not versed in law but the fact the magistrate has sent it to the Crown Court and that LT hasn't entered a plea at this first stage, doesn't bode well should he be found/admit guilt. Okay, thanks, done some research and worked out what not entering a plea means hahaha, which it seems like is equivalent to saying not guilty. Dear oh dear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southvillekiddy Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 6 hours ago, Esmond Million's Bung said: A 2 year ban for being 3 times over the limit is pathetic beyond belief it used to be prison for being that much over the limit, soft as shit. No wheelie bin explains it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukneil Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 1 hour ago, The Gasbuster said: No reason for her employers not to sack her directly afterwards, though. Rooney likely to be fined the maximum by his employers, after being charged. No mention of any punishment from Gallagher's employers ? Well what did they expect anyway? Once a Gallagher, always a Gallagher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Red Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 Thought it was amusing that Sky Sports News had both Jim White and Kirsty Gallacher paired together to discuss Rooney's drink driving ban tonight in sombre tones, given that they are both experts on the topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrumpylegs Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 4 hours ago, ZiderEyed said: Okay, thanks, done some research and worked out what not entering a plea means hahaha, which it seems like is equivalent to saying not guilty. Dear oh dear. The case was always going to go to Crown Court. Not entering a plea at this stage suggests to me that Tomlin is probably looking to either suggest a 'basis of plea' - where the charge is accepted but on the basis that something may have happened to provoke him perhaps? Or else he may be willing to plead guilty to a lesser charge like ABH which would attract a lighter sentence. Either way, assuming he admits/is convicted, he's looking at time - although anything under 2 years can be suspended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esmond Million's Bung Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 4 hours ago, Port Said Red said: That's not strictly trur EMB, he did say in an interview that it was right that he should be dropped, but that was immediately siezed on as being fake news by the ITK's. And he spent a lot of his energy constantly berating everybody and anybody from his own team and especially referees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exAtyeoMax Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 11 hours ago, BrightCiderLife said: Just a helpful pointer for those who haven't had to study legal Latin: Actues Reus is the criminal deed (punching, glassing, stabbing etc.) Mens Rea is the criminal thought (wanting to cause bodily injury). Chris Rea is driving home for Christmas (unlike Rooney, possibly). there's also Gonner… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhistleHappy Posted September 18, 2017 Report Share Posted September 18, 2017 8 hours ago, Loon plage said: Hmm.. Broken jaw ups thre ante I think. Blimey, 'ups the ante' ? ..... a broken jaw is serious, but incest, that's something else altogether. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted September 19, 2017 Report Share Posted September 19, 2017 18 hours ago, CiderJar said: "They spoke only to confirm their names, addresses and pleas, with Kee pleading not guilty and Tomlin electing not to enter a plea at this stage." "Their next court appearance will be at Leicester Crown Court on Monday, October 16." http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/leicester-news/footballers-court-over-alleged-attack-492859 Nothing will happen for weeks. A bit like his career......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted September 19, 2017 Report Share Posted September 19, 2017 15 hours ago, Septic Peg said: Not versed in law but the fact the magistrate has sent it to the Crown Court and that LT hasn't entered a plea at this first stage, doesn't bode well should he be found/admit guilt. if it's gone to crown court with no plea then a custodial sentence is on the cards me thinks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Rob Posted September 19, 2017 Report Share Posted September 19, 2017 6 minutes ago, Monkeh said: if it's gone to crown court with no plea then a custodial sentence is on the cards me thinks Still has to be found guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted September 19, 2017 Report Share Posted September 19, 2017 7 minutes ago, Monkeh said: if it's gone to crown court with no plea then a custodial sentence is on the cards me thinks Oh dear, how sad.....never mind ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhistleHappy Posted September 19, 2017 Report Share Posted September 19, 2017 25 minutes ago, Bristol Rob said: Still has to be found guilty. ....of punching above his weight? (PS ... did the suit come from 'Timberland' ?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murraysrightplum Posted September 19, 2017 Report Share Posted September 19, 2017 On 18/09/2017 at 10:43, wendyredredrobin said: Freak show! The ones outside must all have been rovers fans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.