Lew-T Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, ZiderEyed said: Why is Vyner here then? If LJ doesn't trust him and he's not playing regular U23 football, why isn't he out on loan? It’s a tricky one. You don’t want to leave yourself too short on numbers, especially when we’ve had injuries and suspensions at the back. Unfortunately for Zak, he’s just a number at the minute. He will get his chance. 1 Quote Link to comment
ZiderEyed Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, CitySSeven said: The way AB reads the team out actually seems like we are going 4-4-2. Strange.... 3 at the back would suit the line-up better IMO Good movember effort that. Edited November 18, 2017 by ZiderEyed Quote Link to comment
steviestevieneville Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 17 minutes ago, ZiderEyed said: Okay so 3-5-2 doesn't seem quite as bad. Extra bodies in the midfield. Don't know how I feel about Flint on the right side though. Yeah he could easily get exposed , have to make sure we shield him well. 1 Quote Link to comment
cheshire_red Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Look at the front five for Wednesday, Butterfield, Bannon, Reach, Rhodes and Hooper with Wildsmith and Fletcher on the bench Quote Link to comment
Squeak Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, bristolcitysweden said: The idea of bringing on a donkey is not very attempting. Hopefully Taylor and Reid will do very well. Who’s a donkey? Quote Link to comment
ZiderEyed Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, cheshire_red said: Look at the front five for Wednesday, Butterfield, Bannon, Reach, Rhodes and Hooper with Wildsmith and Fletcher on the bench Good lord. Quote Link to comment
Jon6956 Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 9 minutes ago, CitySSeven said: 3 CBs on the field? HM wouldn't play LB as Joe Bryan is on the pitch. 100% 3 ATB We played 442 with Korey and Magnússon as the full backs in our last game... with Bryan left wing. 1 Quote Link to comment
wendyredredrobin Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 40 minutes ago, CovCyder said: Really need to win this one - the missus is an Owl. COYR! I bet she's a hoot. 2 2 Quote Link to comment
cheshire_red Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 If he read it like it is 442 then it will be, BBC has Smith RB Quote Link to comment
Garland-sweden Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Come on you reds!!! Quote Link to comment
ZiderEyed Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 1 minute ago, wendyredredrobin said: I bet she's a hoot. Needs to learn to keep her beak out though. Quote Link to comment
GrahamC Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Will be delighted to be proved wrong & obviously don't know if Paterson & Djuric are fully fit, but baffled by that team, Magnússon & Taylor especially. 1 Quote Link to comment
CitySSeven Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, Jon6956 said: We played 442 with Korey and Magnússon as the full backs in our last game... with Bryan left wing. See I don't know. To me it looked like we were playing 3ATB, but as the full backs were always pushing up, I couldn't tell if KS and JB were playing wing backs or if it was HM that was at LB and JB at LM. Assuming it is 4-4-2, when Bailey Wright comes back, Surely we can't drop any of them. AF won Player of the Month, Nathan Baker is our Best CB and Bailey Wright is Captain. I can see us moving to 3ATB if we haven't done already. Unless BW plays RB. But then what do you do when EP Returns, albeit in a few months. Nice problems to have 1 Quote Link to comment
ZiderEyed Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 1 minute ago, GrahamC said: Will be delighted to be proved wrong & obviously don't know if Paterson & Djuric are fully fit, but baffled by that team, Magnússon & Taylor especially. Well Magnússon's got his little run in the team now. Didn't we try Taylor and Reid against Fulham? Quote Link to comment
Bar BS3 Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 I’m amazed that Mags has kept his place, after being utterly woeful (bar one throw in) against Cardiff. Let’s hope that was a bad day, rather than proof that he’s not good enough for this level. 1 Quote Link to comment
tinman85 Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Should be doing 5 in midfield. This lot are the best side on paper in the champ. Quote Link to comment
steviestevieneville Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Said on talkSPORT we’re playing 442 Quote Link to comment
Robin101 Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 27 minutes ago, CitySSeven said: The Only reason we play 3 at the back is because we have 3 very solid CBs and none of them are droppable. Magnússon is eminently droppable if you ask me. Quote Link to comment
Bristol Rob Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 I'm not confident about this. 1 Quote Link to comment
wendyredredrobin Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 (edited) Im sure korey will be rb. Leaves us a bit lightweight in the middle of the park. Would like to have played with a false no 9 like the fulham game. Djuric can come on if we need fire power later. But lee looks like he knows what hes doing now. Edited November 18, 2017 by wendyredredrobin 1 Quote Link to comment
CitySSeven Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 If I was Manager With that team, I'd play 3 at the back. and have the extra body in midfield. JB, MP and KS being in midfield is our only solution to our weakness which is midfield. We can't buy anyone, so add an extra body. Quote Link to comment
1891 B.C. Sweden Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Come On You Reds!!! 1 Quote Link to comment
finbarr_in_z Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Free transport. Free pie (thank you whoever you were). Good day so far. Quote Link to comment
bristolcitysweden Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Send them back to New Barack Tavern with zero points 1 Quote Link to comment
CitySSeven Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, Robin101 said: Magnússon is eminently droppable if you ask me. Sorry, I meant our fully fit CBs in BW, AF and NB 1 Quote Link to comment
bristolcitysweden Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 COYR!! Quote Link to comment
Robin101 Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Think this may be a bit like the Wolves game, in that if we manage to get any sort of result it will look a lot better in hindsight a couple of months later. Firmly think Wednesday will still make the play offs. Quote Link to comment
wendyredredrobin Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 (edited) Sheff U won yesterday, so we could do with some points as Cariff should beat Brentford and Reading wont trouble wolves much 25k crowd expected. How many City? Edited November 18, 2017 by wendyredredrobin Quote Link to comment
bristolcitysweden Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 Something is happening above my head. Mozilla Firefox not working. Google Chrome does. **** them both. Quote Link to comment
ZiderEyed Posted November 18, 2017 Report Share Posted November 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, wendyredredrobin said: Sheff U won yesterday, so we could do with some points. 25k crowd expected. How many City? Just over 1000 id imagine. Piss poor in reality. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.