Super Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 5 minutes ago, Olé said: I've been away for 24 hours. Has anyone commented on the fact Harry Wilson was still in the Liverpool youth team when we were explaining how we'd "won" Ryan Kent. I bet Mark Ashton is a riot at funfairs. Probably runs round with a goldfish in an Iceland carrier bag full of water claiming it's the star prize. He was very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 21 minutes ago, swanker said: Right back? Goal keeper, ball boy and static corner flags.. All creative suggestions. 14 minutes ago, Olé said: I've been away for 24 hours. Has anyone commented on the fact Harry Wilson was still in the Liverpool youth team when we were explaining how we'd "won" Ryan Kent. I bet Mark Ashton is a riot at funfairs. Probably runs round with a goldfish in an Iceland carrier bag full of water claiming it's the star prize. Is this the same Ryan Kent that earned a loan deal with Bundesliga side Freiburg. However, that was cut short in January after the winger started only one game and featured for just 241 minutes. but then Goldfish Man came along... Nice one!! i am going back to my friend who supports Liverpool, the one who said we signed a dud and it was well known, and see what more I can find out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolman Block B Posted April 22, 2018 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 46 minutes ago, Super said: We agreed to it so should pay up. But 300k ? The Club always give it the big unne that they won’t do deals to suit If true this is one almighty cock up snd embarrasing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tully Bascomb Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 All these people getting their knickers in a twist over something no one on this forum has any knowledge of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, Dolman Block B said: But 300k ? The Club always give it the big unne that they won’t do deals to suit If true this is one almighty cock up snd embarrasing Up there with the Engvall balls up ? Next thing to be rumoured will be the deal with Diony, who was it Dijon? , whereby City cannot send him back and not buy him unless the club pay a pre agreed break fee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tully Bascomb Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, havanatopia said: Up there with the Engvall balls up ? Next thing to be rumoured will be the deal with Diony, who was it Dijon? , whereby City cannot send him back and not buy him unless the club pay a pre agreed break fee. Very good, Daily Mail quality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 1 minute ago, BoneyardTIM said: Very good, Daily Mail quality I was thinking more the Daily Star. Gonna be some lengthy discussions in the summer at City over these expensive flops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidercity1987 Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 Making a tidy sum from loaning out a crock of shite. Football eh, fff the little men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoonbed Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 I'm not sure if I've seen a better technically, but thick as pig shit footballer in all my time watching City. He obviously possesses the necessary skills to make it, but his positional play and decision making are like that of a 12yr old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midlands Robin Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 So a 300k contract clause fine or a decent striker's wages for 10 weeks at 30k a week. What a great January that was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 It was all over otib when we signed him, that there were clauses in the contract stating there would be fines if he missed so many games and/or a percentage of games not played. I'm amazed that some people are surprised about this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Taz said: It was all over otib when we signed him, that there were clauses in the contract stating there would be fines if he missed so many games and/or a percentage of games not played. I'm amazed that some people are surprised about this 'All over OTIB'. So where did OTIB get the info? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoons Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 Just imagine the score if Kent was playing yesterday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tully Bascomb Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 Not surprised but no one knows what the fine is. It could be 20k or it could be 500k. Either way with hindsight, it was bad for the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, BoneyardTIM said: Not surprised but no one knows what the fine is. It could be 20k or it could be 500k. Either way with hindsight, it was bad for the club. Prior to signing a quick call to Freiburg might have saved a few bob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tully Bascomb Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 Totally agree but a majority of the forum including myself, thought it was a cracking signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 Pretty sure either LJ or MA mentioned it in an interview. Whatever the deal, we went in with eyes open. That’s the danger of loan deals of this type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 I don't know about numbers, however it's clearly a Liverpool policy when they loan young players. Maybe it's similar with big clubs these days- did Tammy's loan have any clauses along these lines? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordy62 Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 My biggest concern in all of this is the scenario where Ryan Kent is actually a very good player. That scares the shit out of me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
54-46 Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 1 hour ago, Olé said: Obviously typed that article on an iPhone. No way someone actually wrote "he was a hit at first". They must not have added shit to their predictive text vocabulary. In fairness, the “a” key is next to the “s” so an easy typo I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 19 minutes ago, Roger Red Hat said: 'All over OTIB'. So where did OTIB get the info? Well for a start it was probably somewhere in this thread when we signed him Kent Interest/Confirmed Signing. It may also have been mentioned in an interview somewhere. Not sure if numbers have ever been mentioned, but my original point was that it was pretty common knowledge at the time of him signing, that there would be clauses if he didn't play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmersonsKev Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 4 minutes ago, Fordy62 said: My biggest concern in all of this is the scenario where Ryan Kent is actually a very good player. That scares the shit out of me. that maybe true, however his application has been questionable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 Just now, Taz said: Well for a start it was probably somewhere in this thread when we signed him Kent Interest/Confirmed Signing. It may also have been mentioned in an interview somewhere. Not sure if numbers have ever been mentioned, but my original point was that it was pretty common knowledge at the time of him signing, that there would be clauses if he didn't play. I agree that liverpool have imposed clauses on players signing on loan. I don't know where anyone has got 300k from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 1 minute ago, EmersonsKev said: that maybe true, however his application has been questionable Indeed it has, not to mention his body language when on the pitch. At times he's looked to have the same levels of confidence as Diony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairman Mao Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 11 minutes ago, Fordy62 said: My biggest concern in all of this is the scenario where Ryan Kent is actually a very good player. That scares the shit out of me. Well Danny Rose turned out all right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 “We don’t have the finances” to go and spend money on big players.....but have the finances to spend £5-10k a week on 3/4 players that are absolute shit and can’t get in the squad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsfan Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 Now you know why we played him all season last year at Barnsley even though during the middle section of the season he was total gash and it was like playing with 10 men. We are too tight to pay the "fine". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottishRed Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, petehinton said: “We don’t have the finances” to go and spend money on big players.....but have the finances to spend £5-10k a week on 3/4 players that are absolute shit and can’t get in the squad? I can’t like this post enough. But we are only a small club in this league / we don’t have the budget / we can’t attract those sort of players. All BS - the club choose to pay out on loans for 3 players, one for a full season, who have contributed next to zero. We could easily afforded to take on a £40k a week striker for 5 months. But that doesn’t fit the #toocosy crew narrative. Dreadful decisions made not for the first time under this regime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Dicks Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 Another great Johnson signing.. in Lee we trust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted April 22, 2018 Report Share Posted April 22, 2018 34 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said: I don't know about numbers, however it's clearly a Liverpool policy when they loan young players. Maybe it's similar with big clubs these days- did Tammy's loan have any clauses along these lines? Common Liverpool thing who are known to be very strict, so many clubs don’t go to Liverpool for loans. And yes there were stipulations in Tammy’s contract, ‘at least X amount of minutes to be played when fit and available’. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.