Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol Rovers


bcfcredandwhite

Recommended Posts

As soon as I formed my allegiance to Bristol City, I was told that I had to hate the Rovers. This was in the early 1970’s when ‘gangs’ of kids used to march up and down my playground and pick anyone who was wearing either blue or red and beat them up (you were always guaranteed to be beaten up by someone). 

Talking to an old boy I met in the Bear and Swan in Chew Magna - he said that in his day the fans went to support whoever was playing at home.  Basically one week he would support City and the next it would be Rovers - there was no hatred or nastiness - the City united behind its football teams. 

This sounds a bit like Liverpool - LFC and Everton don’t hate each other so I’m told - families support both clubs and there are no issues. 

Where and when did it all go nasty with us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, bcfcredandwhite said:

As soon as I formed my allegiance to Bristol City, I was told that I had to hate the Rovers. This was in the early 1970’s when ‘gangs’ of kids used to march up and down my playground and pick anyone who was wearing either blue or red and beat them up (you were always guaranteed to be beaten up by someone). 

Talking to an old boy I met in the Bear and Swan in Chew Magna - he said that in his day the fans went to support whoever was playing at home.  Basically one week he would support City and the next it would be Rovers - there was no hatred or nastiness - the City united behind its football teams. 

This sounds a bit like Liverpool - LFC and Everton don’t hate each other so I’m told - families support both clubs and there are no issues. 

Where and when did it all go nasty with us?

Liverpool and Everton do hate each. All that friendly derby nonsense is a myth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, milo1111 said:

Liverpool and Everton do hate each. All that friendly derby nonsense is a myth.

Nah, I honestly reckon it's nicer than it is in Bristol.

It's founded in North vs South here, it's changed massively in the last few years but if you lived in Horfield you'd have supported that lot more, if you lived in Bemmy or wherever you'd have been us predominantly. People would've gone to see both but it's more geographical. Anfield and Goodison are just across Stanley Park, it's like the Mem being on the other side of Greville Smyth. It's more random in Merseyside, splits families in half. Theres never gonna be as much genuine animosity as there is here imv because you're hating your brother or your wife, I rarely see families with split loyalties in Bristol.

Might not be a friendly derby but hate is a bit strong for a game where people from both sides sit together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ZiderEyed said:

Nah, I honestly reckon it's nicer than it is in Bristol.

It's founded in North vs South here, it's changed massively in the last few years but if you lived in Horfield you'd have supported that lot more, if you lived in Bemmy or wherever you'd have been us predominantly. People would've gone to see both but it's more geographical. Anfield and Goodison are just across Stanley Park, it's like the Mem being on the other side of Greville Smyth. It's more random in Merseyside, splits families in half. Theres never gonna be as much genuine animosity as there is here imv because you're hating your brother or your wife, I rarely see families with split loyalties in Bristol.

Might not be a friendly derby but hate is a bit strong for a game where people from both sides sit together.

Nah. The North/South split has always been a myth perpetuated by the blue few trying to big themselves up that they have half the City. Unfortunately some City from south of the river fall into their trap all too frequently. 

Certainly North-West Bristol in the late 60/70’s was roughly equal red/blue. Some hotspots within that of red/blue but overall pretty even.  Horfield then was pretty even as was Southmead. The real divide was roughly along the Gloucester Road where they had a distinctly blue segment running down to Eastvile and Fishponds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Moor2Sea said:

Nah. The North/South split has always been a myth perpetuated by the blue few trying to big themselves up that they have half the City. Unfortunately some City from south of the river fall into their trap all too frequently. 

Certainly North-West Bristol in the late 60/70’s was roughly equal red/blue. Some hotspots within that of red/blue but overall pretty even.  Horfield then was pretty even as was Southmead. The real divide was roughly along the Gloucester Road where they had a distinctly blue segment running down to Eastvile and Fishponds. 

Obviously not old enough to talk about this and feel genuinely qualified, but in my experience I've always found a kernel of truth around that particular myth.

Fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Moor2Sea said:

Nah. The North/South split has always been a myth perpetuated by the blue few trying to big themselves up that they have half the City. Unfortunately some City from south of the river fall into their trap all too frequently. 

Certainly North-West Bristol in the late 60/70’s was roughly equal red/blue. Some hotspots within that of red/blue but overall pretty even.  Horfield then was pretty even as was Southmead. The real divide was roughly along the Gloucester Road where they had a distinctly blue segment running down to Eastvile and Fishponds. 

Stockwood was always pretty much split back in the day as well 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, joe jordans teeth said:

Stockwood was always pretty much split back in the day as well 

I grew up around Whitchurch and it was quite strange as you could tell where the odd gasheads were as they would religiously have something gas on - be it a hat, shirt, air freshener in the car (required for obvious reasons).We always got the impression that everyone else was City. 

It's like they felt they had to have something gas on at all times to avoid being labelled City purely through location. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was at school in the 60s there was definitely rivalry, but not the hatred you have today. As I lived much closer to Eastville than Ashton Gate, I sometimes even went to Rovers’ matches when City was away! As I usually got in free by walking along by the river and climbing in through a hole in the fence, then supporting the opposition, I felt that this was OK. I think the change in attitude started in the 70s when football hooliganism began to take over. It was difficult to have friendly rivalry when some of the opposition supporters were trying to put you in hospital 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ZiderEyed said:

Nah, I honestly reckon it's nicer than it is in Bristol.

It's founded in North vs South here, it's changed massively in the last few years but if you lived in Horfield you'd have supported that lot more, if you lived in Bemmy or wherever you'd have been us predominantly. People would've gone to see both but it's more geographical. Anfield and Goodison are just across Stanley Park, it's like the Mem being on the other side of Greville Smyth. It's more random in Merseyside, splits families in half. Theres never gonna be as much genuine animosity as there is here imv because you're hating your brother or your wife, I rarely see families with split loyalties in Bristol.

Might not be a friendly derby but hate is a bit strong for a game where people from both sides sit together.

It may be slightly “nicer” in Liverpool because despite the fierce rivalry/hatred (I do agree that the nice friendly image is largely a myth) they also have a certain level of respect for each other, their past achievements and stature of each club. Both traditional, both well supported, both with a history of successful periods and a long standing fixture of at least 2 games a season, with just Stanley Park dividing the 2 clubs.

Our rivalry with Rovers feeds on bitterness, jealousy on their part, bad feeling on both sides, a cross city divide and a lack of success to respect. That and the fact that their supporters are compulsive liars and inbred morons..!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bar BS3 said:

It may be slightly “nicer” in Liverpool because despite the fierce rivalry/hatred (I do agree that the nice friendly image is largely a myth) they also have a certain level of respect for each other, their past achievements and stature of each club. Both traditional, both well supported, both with a history of successful periods and a long standing fixture of at least 2 games a season, with just Stanley Park dividing the 2 clubs.

Our rivalry with Rovers feeds on bitterness, jealousy on their part, bad feeling on both sides, a cross city divide and a lack of success to respect. That and the fact that their supporters are compulsive liars and inbred morons..!

Nicer perhaps wasn't the right word to use admittedly!

Past achievements is probably what it comes down to, good post that. :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Carey 6 said:

I see the Liverpool Everton derby rivalry as being a friendly one as well. 

If I had to name top 5 derbies in England I'd say (no particular order)

- Steel City

- Villa v Birmingham

- West Ham v Mill

- Tyne wear. 

- City v Gas

Only sort of counts, but Chester - Wrexham is very tasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carey 6 said:

Yeah the whole 'Scottys in a box' incident was a bit mental. 

Yep, heavy. Some things should just be left outside football stadiums imo. Same goes for the Aberfan stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Carey 6 said:

I see the Liverpool Everton derby rivalry as being a friendly one as well. 

If I had to name top 5 derbies in England I'd say (no particular order)

- Steel City

- Villa v Birmingham

- West Ham v Mill

- Tyne wear. 

- City v Gas

I would add

Soton v Pompey

Exeter v Plymuff (under rated but means a lot down here!)

 

City v Gas got to be top 10 in the UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, bcfcredandwhite said:

As soon as I formed my allegiance to Bristol City, I was told that I had to hate the Rovers. This was in the early 1970’s when ‘gangs’ of kids used to march up and down my playground and pick anyone who was wearing either blue or red and beat them up (you were always guaranteed to be beaten up by someone). 

Talking to an old boy I met in the Bear and Swan in Chew Magna - he said that in his day the fans went to support whoever was playing at home.  Basically one week he would support City and the next it would be Rovers - there was no hatred or nastiness - the City united behind its football teams. 

This sounds a bit like Liverpool - LFC and Everton don’t hate each other so I’m told - families support both clubs and there are no issues. 

Where and when did it all go nasty with us?

Early to mid 70's

(so just when you got started..... :thumbsup:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pongo88 said:

When I was at school in the 60s there was definitely rivalry, but not the hatred you have today. As I lived much closer to Eastville than Ashton Gate, I sometimes even went to Rovers’ matches when City was away! As I usually got in free by walking along by the river and climbing in through a hole in the fence, then supporting the opposition, I felt that this was OK. I think the change in attitude started in the 70s when football hooliganism began to take over. It was difficult to have friendly rivalry when some of the opposition supporters were trying to put you in hospital 

This is certainly how I remember it.  My dad and I would watch Rovers occasionally on a Saturday if City and Bristol rugby were away, and it wasn't a problem.  There was a bit of rivalry at school but not match as very few kids supported Rovers!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Dolman Pragmatist said:

This is certainly how I remember it.  My dad and I would watch Rovers occasionally on a Saturday if City and Bristol rugby were away, and it wasn't a problem.  There was a bit of rivalry at school but not match as very few kids supported Rovers!!

Similar story here.

My Dad was on the buses all his working life and sometimes used to volunteer for overtime on match-days at Ashton Gate, as the bus crews staffing the fleet of specials that were laid on in those days (before most people had cars) were allowed to sit around the pitch-side and watch free, though it meant missing the beginning and end of the game as they had to be available to man the buses either side of kick-off and full-time. We lived on Windmill Hill, where I grew up, and Dad had been a City fan since boyhood, so I was indoctrinated from an early age. (Terrible thing to do to a kid, when you consider the lifelong suffering to which he was condemning me. It would be a child protection issue in these more enlightened times and he'd probably have Social Services after him.) 

Anyway, I certainly recognise the accounts of playground intimidation at junior school, so there has always been rivalry, but I also think it's probably true that it turned to something much darker some time during the hooligan era. Certainly there was nothing unusual about a couple of City supporters like me and Dad going to Eastville to watch a match. Lots of people did that: I also occasionally went with mates when I was a bit older. It certainly wasn't a case of actually supporting both teams, though. There was never the slightest doubt about where allegiances lay and I always came away happier if Rovers got turned over, but the point was we loved the game and sometimes just wanted to watch a professional football match on a Saturday when City were away.

Nobody would have seen anything wrong in that at all at the time. I haven't done it for decades now, but imagine the vitriol it would attract on OTIB if you made it known you attended games at both clubs. The schoolboy in me still wears a satisfied smirk on his face when he hears that Rovers have lost a game, but the intensely bitter, nasty element that may be a legacy of the seventies is something I dislike and will never quite understand. I remember one bloke on here years ago who swore he'd disown his own daughter if she chose to marry a gas head. He might, I suppose, have been kidding, and I may have been suffering from irony failure, but it didn't come across like that, and if he was being serious, you really do have to wonder what sort of person adopts that kind of mentality.

One of the guys I've sat with for years has a friend who is a Rovers fan. He came to a game recently in place of one of the regulars who couldn't make it. Nobody in my crowd thought anything of it: a bit of light-hearted banter, maybe, and that was it, otherwise nobody batted an eyelid. There is a generational element to it, it would appear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, bcfcredandwhite said:

 

Where and when did it all go nasty with us?

From the seventies.

Used to be City and Rovers pubs on the centre.

Citys mob took ascendancy and moved the Gas out towards what was considered their territory.

Who knows, where or what started it .. Everybody was rowing with somebody each weekend football or not.  

Got really vicious late eighties.

The dangerous lunacy came to its head with the Inns of Court (City) v Essex Arms (Gas) sunday league cup game game, City running amok at Gas pubs around Old Market, Stapleton road and arson at Twerton. 

The craziness calmed after that ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I grew up in Filton which always seemed to me to be evenly split. 

I and many others went to both grounds as no TV football, away travel, apart from local games and big cup games, was not possible. Pre motorways, nobody had a car, less disposable income etc. 

But always wanted the away team to win at Rovers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps it was the 1970s that saw not only the rise of the hooligan, but it was also when the 2 teams had to play against each other? 

I haven’t googled the history - I can remember back to 1975 but no earlier really as my parents were not into football in any capacity. 

I suppose as soon as the 2 have to play each other - and a win (or loss) could mean promotion or relegation then the ‘other lot’ could be seen as traitors?

just a thought.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...