BCFC11 Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 Something very fishy with this whole thing imo. As others have said previously why has this taken so long, usually hear about these sort of incidents within a matter of days at the latest, also from footage that we have available it doesn’t look like anything of the sort happened, David Davis is abit of a hothead and if he was spat at Fammy would def of knew about it and not some petty head to head nonsense which is clearly visible. Dont get me wrong if he has, he should be very strongly reprimanded and rightly so but struggling to see what evidence the FA have on this, it wasn’t a featured game so don’t think they’ll have any other camera angles other than the one that is available to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazeyrobins Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 I know totally different but if a player spits towards the fans although still on the pitch ( which in my view was intentionally done) should they get a ban as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TinMan's left peg Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 8 minutes ago, Davefevs said: No appeal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyb Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 13 minutes ago, Davefevs said: It takes just the first question for the whole saga to seem more bizarre: "The incident took place on April 10, during a 3-1 win over Birmingham. During the regular season the FA operates a 'fast track disciplinary system' as the governing body looks to deal with incidents before a player plays their next game." Surely on April 10th there are still at least 4 league games left to play?? Potentially season-defining games too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 15 minutes ago, Davefevs said: Load of shite... 'During the regular season the FA operates a 'fast track disciplinary system' as the governing body looks to deal with incidents before a player plays their next game. However, with it now being the end of the season there was no need to fast track the charge'. If the ban had been imposed before the next league game as was with Bailey Wright then Diedhiou would have served 4 of the 6 games last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyb Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 Also, since when can bans not be appealed? What makes this offence so different that the usual appeal process is not available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of Fred Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 2 hours ago, Slippin cider said: Looks like jimmy saville .... Can you milk a llama blindfolded??... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider red Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 So Bailey gets a 3 match ban for being pushed; red card recinded. Then 6 game ban with no actual evidence for fammy; someone at the fa doesn' like us.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexukhc Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 So in other words “sorry guys we was too busy booking our flights to Russia to care about 4 games of season to go” the FA is a joke shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 1 minute ago, alexukhc said: So in other words “sorry guys we was too busy booking our flights to Russia to care about 4 games of season to go” the FA is a joke shop 12 minutes ago, joeyb said: It takes just the first question for the whole saga to seem more bizarre: "The incident took place on April 10, during a 3-1 win over Birmingham. During the regular season the FA operates a 'fast track disciplinary system' as the governing body looks to deal with incidents before a player plays their next game." Surely on April 10th there are still at least 4 league games left to play?? Potentially season-defining games too. Just shows what a joke the FA are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 16 minutes ago, hodge said: Load of shite... 'During the regular season the FA operates a 'fast track disciplinary system' as the governing body looks to deal with incidents before a player plays their next game. However, with it now being the end of the season there was no need to fast track the charge'. If the ban had been imposed before the next league game as was with Bailey Wright then Diedhiou would have served 4 of the 6 games last season. Your comment is spot on. The part of the BP article quote that I have bolded is absolute nonsense. It is only correct in that it is now- as of the time the article was written- that the season for us is over. But at the time of the actual incident there was around a month left. With the accusation being of spitting and that carrying a 6 game ban the process should absolutely have been fast tracked. At the time of all this the playoffs was still a possibility- now imagine we made the playoff final thanks to Diedhiou goals in the semis, then the news is announced that he should have been banned for 6 games (which would have had the semi final second leg as the 6th) Whoever our semi final opponents were in that hypothetical would (quite rightly) feel aggrieved, as we would do if it was the opposite situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 25 minutes ago, Robert the bruce said: Can you milk a llama blindfolded??... You don't have to blindfold them they love it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 Wonder what would have happened had it been Diony ? Would they have made us sign him on permanently ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pride of the west Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 If indeed this is true, will he now be known as Famara the lama? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norn Iron Posted May 22, 2018 Report Share Posted May 22, 2018 5 hours ago, Major Isewater said: Scott McGarvey hair too . The day Scott played against us for Darlington (prior to us signing him) was one of the most memorable games I have ever witnessed when it comes to the football version of sledging. How he endured constant comments and chants from even the enclosure was impressive. Scott played well too which is one way to silence them. He cut his hair when he joined us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpexile Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 7 hours ago, Olé said: I think it's pretty abhorrent simply because it's cowardly and rather distasteful, but it does surprise me that being spat at in a bar (saliva on jacket) can trigger World War 3, but someone dropping their guts at the bar (everyone inhales rotting remains of their dinner) produces much mirth and merriment. Love that phrase, can I please use it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevep38 Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 Having just read the posts version of what the FA have said. It made me wonder if the independant panel was the same 3 that rulled over the Bailey incident. If it was then one or all of them have got a real grudge over BCFC. Also the FA saying oh it was near the end of the season so we had more time is rubbish. With 4 games to go it should of been dealt with then and there. Why are they being so harsh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggersno1Fan Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 40 minutes ago, stevep38 said: Having just read the posts version of what the FA have said. It made me wonder if the independant panel was the same 3 that rulled over the Bailey incident. If it was then one or all of them have got a real grudge over BCFC. Also the FA saying oh it was near the end of the season so we had more time is rubbish. With 4 games to go it should of been dealt with then and there. Why are they being so harsh? If the club had accepted the charge in the first place it if been a 3 match ban & probably served the end of the season. the club thought there try it on & have lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 9 minutes ago, Maggersno1Fan said: If the club had accepted the charge in the first place it if been a 3 match ban & probably served the end of the season. the club thought there try it on & have lost it happened on the 10th of april the appeal shouldn't of taken this long, the club saw no evidence (you can still see the whole match online) the players at the time hardly reacted like they'd been spat at, the club once 100% correct in appealing so don't make it out like the club are trying it on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 The FA don't like us very much, almost certain of that. The pyro shit means they are perhaps looking at us more harshly than is merited- is also the reason I think they- or in that case the EFL- may try to make a bit of an example of us if we went through FFP. We have, had a reputation for pyros moreso than a lot of clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dolman Pragmatist Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, Maggersno1Fan said: If the club had accepted the charge in the first place it if been a 3 match ban & probably served the end of the season. the club thought there try it on & have lost Or Famara was adamant that he didn't do it and was prepared to support him, as they should. Everyone spits, it's no big deal, the issue he is whether he spat at someone. If that was the case, I do find it extraordinary that it did not become apparent during the match, or afterwards through match highlights and analysis. If you're up close to someone shouting at them, it wouldn't be first time that a bit of spit flies out, but hey what do I know? I'd rather be spat at than punched in the face, but maybe I'm in the minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KernowRed Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 Sell Fammy now, no problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EstoniaTallinnRed Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 19 hours ago, Major Isewater said: It is not terribly civilised but when you engage in high physical activity your body excretes mucous from the nose and mouth and unless you have several big hankerchieves up your sleeve you're never going to get rid of it all without spitting. Most footballers do seem to have turned it into an art form though ! Yes Major and some kids think it the right thing to do when just walking down the street, disgusting! When I was a bus driver we were given DNA kits to carry, in case we were spat on by a passenger and used as proof when the incident was caught on CCTV, as then and probably now, spitting at someone was considered an assault. luckily in 13 years it never happened to me, thank goodness. Altogether a disgusting action, spitting at anyone or anything! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, EstoniaTallinnRed said: Yes Major and some kids think it the right thing to do when just walking down the street, disgusting! When I was a bus driver we were given DNA kits to carry, in case we were spat on by a passenger and used as proof when the incident was caught on CCTV, as then and probably now, spitting at someone was considered an assault. luckily in 13 years it never happened to me, thank goodness. Altogether a disgusting action, spitting at anyone or anything! I would prefer the physios to run onto the pitch with hankerchieves whenever the little darlings had a dewdrop moment. This could be a new marketing product for our club , City hankies with the player's name printed on them , shirts are so yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 Not sure why people are blaming the FA 6 games is the norm for a spitting offence and Wright clearly threw himself to the floor. Or am i missing something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Maggersno1Fan said: If the club had accepted the charge in the first place it if been a 3 match ban & probably served the end of the season. the club thought there try it on & have lost Wrong And a nonsense post Spitting is a MANDATORY SIX game ban Six games is the mandatory suspension for anyone found to have spat at someone during a match. The Newcastle striker Papiss Cissé was banned for seven games in 2015 after a special independent commission investigating an altercation with Manchester United’s Jonny Evans took prior violent conduct into consideration when handing out his sentence. The FA’s tariff had been revised upwards in the summer of 2014 in order to fall in line with Fifa’s position on the matter but there is no doubt everyone in the game reviles spitting. Whenever the various bodies in the English professional game gather to discuss matters of regulation, it’s consistently agreed to be beyond the pale. Violent conduct, it is felt, is an unavoidable consequence of a contact sport, spitting on someone not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myol'man Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 1 hour ago, KernowRed said: Sell Fammy now, no problem. To Birmingham? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickJ Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Super said: Not sure why people are blaming the FA 6 games is the norm for a spitting offence and Wright clearly threw himself to the floor. Or am i missing something? You're missing nothing, plenty of others are though. Unless you believe that the FA has a pathological hatred of Bristol City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Island Posted May 23, 2018 Report Share Posted May 23, 2018 On 22/05/2018 at 18:36, Mtimmy11 said: My friends daughter once got spat on by a Somalian at school and all the police came up with was that it’s not that serious in the African culture.but this is England so bomb the vile b——-d out of if quilty and tell Lansdown to start showing some leadership before it’s to late Disgusting vile character is Quilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.