Jump to content
IGNORED

Bryan 100% going....


BCFC1512

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Icelandic Clap said:

I think the Netherlands numbered the '74 squad alphabetically with the exception of Cruyff. In 78 they numbered the surviving members of 74 with the same numbers and everyone else had 'normal' numbers (goalkeeper Jongblooed (sp?) wore 8 again) 

Italy had an interesting one, with players allocated numbers alphabetically based on position-keepers were 1, 12, 22 (though often the actual number 1 would wear the 1 shirt, hence Zenga in 1990) defenders 2-8/9, midfielders 9/10-18 and strikers 18/19-21. Exceptions were allowed, Baggio wore 10 in 94. By 98 they had largely left this numbering policy.

Should you ever think about going on Mastermind I think we've found your specialist subject!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Woodsy said:

Not in the 70s, was always for the hard man midfielder

Don't give a rats arse about 3. 4 is my problem

That was before squad numbers and when everyone played 442. A midfielder HAD to take a number now used for defenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Woodsy said:

I'm more concerned that Webster is going to take #4

It's not a shirt for a centre half, ffs. Give it to a defensive midfielder. Generally couldn't give a **** who wears what, but Flint and Fonts wearing 4 :grr:

Webster can have 3 if Bryan is off

Steve Bruce wore number 4 for United. I've always thought of 4 and 6 as CB numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Joe will not sign the club must sell him!!

Joe has the opertuneaty to become a club legend by staying and being part of the squad that takes us to the promised land!

The problem is the riches that he could get and the signing on fee from another club. He is probably see this as possible his only chance to get his big move. 

I for one would love him to stay as a lad that has come through the system to first team is alway special to us fans. Plus he’s a dam good player when on his game. 

The closer we get to the deadline the fee may raise but it may not be able to get a replacement or use the cash in this window. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TBW said:

That was before squad numbers and when everyone played 442. A midfielder HAD to take a number now used for defenders.

No one HAD to take a particular number. Squad numbers or not, 4 should be banned for centre backs

4 hours ago, Spike said:

Steve Bruce wore number 4 for United. I've always thought of 4 and 6 as CB numbers. 

5 and 6

1 hour ago, JasonM88 said:

No.

1 - GK

2- RB

3 - LB

4 - CM

5 - CB

6 - CB

7 - RM

8 - CM

9 - Big Striker

10 - Little Striker

11 - LM

At last, thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Woodsy said:

At last, thank you

Too bad you won't ever see teams play all 1-11 in a game anymore. If you wanna see a CM wearing #4 so bad go watch non-league instead.

How do you deal with teams that don't play 442 as well? What about when we've played 352 in the past?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TBW said:

Too bad you won't ever see teams play all 1-11 in a game anymore. If you wanna see a CM wearing #4 so bad go watch non-league instead.

How do you deal with teams that don't play 442 as well? What about when we've played 352 in the past?

You are taking this very badly

I don't like centre backs wearing 4. I don't care about formations, 1 to 11 or non league football to any great degree. But thanks for your concern

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OldlandReddies said:

That does look one hell of a squad though. Should be pushing top 6 with a couple more quality additions. Well excited for next week now.

Looks like quantity over quality for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Woodsy said:

Not in the 70s, was always for the hard man midfielder 

Don't give a rats arse about 3. 4 is my problem

Number 4 - Gerry Gow...case closed.

Now about Glyn Riley wearing number 6 as a striker! There's a real mind bender...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Super said:

Looks like quantity over quality for me.

Think if setup right it could be pretty decent with cover for injuries and suspensions- but the quantity creates a problem in itself, because what's our best team- what's our best shape?

With that many options...tinkering becomes highly tempting (and possible).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, glynriley said:

Number 4 - Gerry Gow...case closed.

Now about Glyn Riley wearing number 6 as a striker! There's a real mind bender...

That was in a 442, 1 to 11 based system

Doesn't count. As we all now know :fear:

And your namesake could wear any God damn number he wanted!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Woodsy said:

I'm more concerned that Webster is going to take #4

It's not a shirt for a centre half, ffs. Give it to a defensive midfielder. Generally couldn't give a **** who wears what, but Flint and Fonts wearing 4 :grr:

Webster can have 3 if Bryan is off

Glyn Riley wore number 6 playing up front ..... loved it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, richwwtk said:

Argentina that did that exact thing in a World Cup (1978 maybe?). I think Ossie Ardiles was #1.

 

19 hours ago, Davefevs said:

Argentina 1978 did just that.  Worked out well!!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_FIFA_World_Cup_Final

No2, Alonso. Was No1.  Fillol the keeper no5.

Here’s Ardiles wearing number 1.... although this pic could have been from the 1982 World Cup? I think Argentina did the alphabetical thing then as well....but I seem to remember they made an exception so Maradona could wear 10! What a diva!

 

B5A5EA20-C7AB-4FF1-BDE6-8B6D1B290701.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we took on some part-timers say 3 days a week and alternate Saturdays, then we could have players sharing the same number. It would never get confusing during games because they would never work on the same day together. Similarly, we could allow players to have a holiday or two during the season and get in temporary players to fill the void and they would be allotted the same number as the vacationer. Perhaps we can just hire two full-time professionals to fill in for the two players who are on holiday at any one time and thus have multiple numbers. This would be a good source of revenue as the club could run a lottery pre-season in which supporters guess the sequence of numbers a particular fill in player will wear during the season. Anyone who gets 6 in a row gets free use of an executive box for a year. Anyone who gets 5 out of 6 and then the bonus shirt gets a brick in the Wedlock Wall.

This is the germ of a good idea. We could be the first club to give players 4 weeks paid holiday during the season, on condition that if they are ever injured they use part of their holiday, or all of it, there and then. At present, if a player is injured/suspended other clubs rub their hands in glee. Like, Leeds United fans will be buoyed if they hear that the City team facing them will be without Pack and COD due to injury. However, if they heard that City were without Pack and COD because they were on holiday, it would really freak them out and get into their heads. They would automatically feel inferior because we were so strong we can allow players to have in season holidays.

Of course, if a player gets injured during a match, this will have to be disguised to make it look like he is going off on holiday early to beat the traffic. For instance, stretcher bearers can come on to the pitch carrying a suitcase and also a pair of shades to apply to the stricken player. The fans can do our bit by calling out, 'Have a nice time,' and, 'send us a postcard,' etc as the player is stretchered off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

 

Here’s Ardiles wearing number 1.... although this pic could have been from the 1982 World Cup? I think Argentina did the alphabetical thing then as well....but I seem to remember they made an exception so Maradona could wear 10! What a diva!

 

B5A5EA20-C7AB-4FF1-BDE6-8B6D1B290701.png

1982 squire.  Was at PSG at the time due to Falklands IIRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

 

Here’s Ardiles wearing number 1.... although this pic could have been from the 1982 World Cup? I think Argentina did the alphabetical thing then as well....but I seem to remember they made an exception so Maradona could wear 10! What a cheating, drug taking ***

 

B5A5EA20-C7AB-4FF1-BDE6-8B6D1B290701.png

Just a slight correction there, mate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Undy English said:

I find it hilarious how grown men fret so much about what numbered shirt they play in. 

Multi-national superstars with brands, like CR7 or Beckham, I understand, they have marketing commitments, but Championship footballers etc. I just don't get the big deal personally.

wen i played outfield I always played in a number 4 shirt because it was my lucky number, I spent most of my outfield games on the left wing or left back despite being right footed,

the age of positions having numbers has long gone, its down to what number a player wants these days and its normally based on seniority 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...