DT The Optimist Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 Was not present, listened to most of it radio. Owers said he had a good game. After his performance last week what’s the view from those who were there. Will he be in Saturday v PNE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Bailey Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 Tidy in possession but should not be starting over O'Dowda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 Good first half and then faded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stockwood gate Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 I thought he was one of our better players always trying to get us playing forward the problem was Fammy and Taylor unable to hold anything up for the second faze Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City fan 1982 Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 I thought he done ok , looked to get stuck in , looks creative. Plays some clever balls , too clever sometimes for our players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_eastender Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 14 minutes ago, kivsy said: I thought he done ok , looked to get stuck in , looks creative. Plays some clever balls , too clever sometimes for our players Agree, looked to play the ball forward and rarely gave it away, got some good tackles in too. He faded in the second-half, but that's to be expected given he has had such little game time. Should start against PNE, if needs be in place of Pack who, goal apart, was slow and sloppy with passing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDOXO Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 16 minutes ago, old_eastender said: Agree, looked to play the ball forward and rarely gave it away, got some good tackles in too. He faded in the second-half, but that's to be expected given he has had such little game time. Should start against PNE, if needs be in place of Pack who, goal apart, was slow and sloppy with passing. That is one of our issues right now. Pack starts no matter what. Couple that with Patterson must at least get on, despite all evidence, we are an effective man light. LJ needs one of Hakeem or Eisa soon and they need to be 1.5 mill footballers from the off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lez Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 I havent been convinced by what ive seen so far. Hard to be critical seeing such little game time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SODS_LAW Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 Walsh is Better then pack, Walsh can see his pass before he has the ball. Pack needs 5 seconds to think about it, but pack does one 30 yard cross field pass a game so he must be amazing. I seen he got voted in the best city team of the last 35 years on Twitter he’s not even the best midfielder in the squad in fact he’s the 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Second City Exile Posted November 3, 2018 Report Share Posted November 3, 2018 Was the plan in the first half for everything to go through Walsh? He was certainly the most creative player in our side and always wanted the ball, wanted to be involved. Good to see his combative side too- shades of Tommy Docherty ? Agree that he faded in the second half. Very similar performance and playing style to their goal scorer, Kelly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leadman Posted November 4, 2018 Report Share Posted November 4, 2018 Lee j has said Walsh is good in a 3.. but went with him in a 2 today... I would use him off the bench or when we play 3 5 2... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottishRed Posted November 4, 2018 Report Share Posted November 4, 2018 4 hours ago, leadman said: Lee j has said Walsh is good in a 3.. but went with him in a 2 today... I would use him off the bench or when we play 3 5 2... Which is a bizarre comment by the HC given his love of 4-4-2. If that is the case then why did we spend £1m+ oh him? Another example, one of many, of confused thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.