Up The City! Posted January 13, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, Redsi2 said: This picture from the Post surely proves beyond doubt. What proved it beyond any doubt was the fact GLT gave it as a goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted January 13, 2019 Report Share Posted January 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, slartibartfast said: Typically, Bolton's media called it a controversial call. Was it ****...........it was GLT, or hasn't that got oop north yet ? Have they got nets up there yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted January 13, 2019 Report Share Posted January 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Roger Red Hat said: Have they got nets up there yet? Nope, still tape across the two uprights ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Red Hat Posted January 13, 2019 Report Share Posted January 13, 2019 1 minute ago, slartibartfast said: Nope, still tape across the two uprights ! At least that would be one bar we couldn't hit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviestevieneville Posted January 13, 2019 Report Share Posted January 13, 2019 14 minutes ago, Davefevs said: Yes, was start of last season, just found my tweet. the other system must’ve been 16/17 season. Wasn’t it used for a pato free kick last season that bounced down off the bar ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antman Posted January 13, 2019 Report Share Posted January 13, 2019 On 12/01/2019 at 19:01, Erithacus said: Didn't think there was a terribly long delay in the ref's watch pinging. Got the right decision, which is the main thing. Also recall seeing a technician with a ball on the goalline recently, communicating by radio to (presumably) the system upstairs. they do that frequently before games to check the tech - the bloke with the radio basically holds a ball around and over the line to check it registers correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snufflelufagus Posted January 13, 2019 Report Share Posted January 13, 2019 50 minutes ago, slartibartfast said: Typically, Bolton's media called it a controversial call. Was it ****...........it was GLT, or hasn't that got oop north yet ? I think that was a parody Twitter account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southvillekiddy Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 14 hours ago, Neo said: Disagree. I thought the goal the other night was clear (Liverpool was it?) and 11mm of the ball was not over the line. Looking at the recent pictures I cannot tell if the ball strikes that defender in the chest that 100% of the ball would have crossed the line albeit it looks likely. Wait and use the technology. What if the ref or linesman was like “oh yeah that is in“, gives it and the watch does not go off - we in the stands and players on pitch would be going bat-shit if he suddenly reversed the decision !! Thing is mate even before I saw the Evening Post picture above I was going on the position of the defenders feet, which were well behind the goal line. So my point remains, if we were seeing just the ball pinging about it's more difficult to judge where it is in space in relation to the goal line than if it's near or in this case touching a player who is behind the line. I do agree however that the technology must be used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted January 14, 2019 Admin Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 16 hours ago, E.G.Red said: I believe they have been advised not to raise their flag in such situations The linesman held his arm out straight, I assumed it was his way of indicating his watch had shown it was a goal? 16 hours ago, BobBobSuperBob said: 3.76 seconds from time ball crosses line to referees whistle to signal goal At the time it seemed like an age, but on the highlights it didn't seem as long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chivs Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 15 hours ago, Redsi2 said: This picture from the Post surely proves beyond doubt. That's a "Spot the ball" competition photo right there! I like Taylor's concentration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhistleHappy Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 17 hours ago, Roger Red Hat said: Have they got nets up there yet? 17 hours ago, slartibartfast said: Nope, still tape across the two uprights ! Fair play to them for that, they've clearly progressed from using a couple of Fred Dibnahs old cloth caps, they really shouldn't tie whippets to the new uprights though.. not nice for goalies diving onto warm dog pee puddles. Progress all the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILINFRANCE Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 6 hours ago, southvillekiddy said: Thing is mate even before I saw the Evening Post picture above I was going on the position of the defenders feet, which were well behind the goal line. So my point remains, if we were seeing just the ball pinging about it's more difficult to judge where it is in space in relation to the goal line than if it's near or in this case touching a player who is behind the line. I do agree however that the technology must be used. Indeed, and as you stated in an earlier post: '....but in this case their defender was well back over the line and the ball hit him on the chest, so it should have been clear to the ref what happened without the technology.' Although, consider womens football, especially with, e.g. Jordan in your defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southvillekiddy Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 17 minutes ago, PHILINFRANCE said: Indeed, and as you stated in an earlier post: '....but in this case their defender was well back over the line and the ball hit him on the chest, so it should have been clear to the ref what happened without the technology.' Although, consider womens football, especially with, e.g. Jordan in your defence. Tut, tut. A bit saucy there Phil! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhistleHappy Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Posted January 14, 2019 6 hours ago, PHILINFRANCE said: Indeed, and as you stated in an earlier post: '....but in this case their defender was well back over the line and the ball hit him on the chest, so it should have been clear to the ref what happened without the technology.' **Although, consider womens football, especially with, e.g. Jordan in your defence. **Good 'points' well made Phil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanterne Rouge Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 On 14/01/2019 at 16:51, PHILINFRANCE said: Indeed, and as you stated in an earlier post: '....but in this case their defender was well back over the line and the ball hit him on the chest, so it should have been clear to the ref what happened without the technology.' Although, consider womens football, especially with, e.g. Jordan in your defence. Also, how could the technology distinguish between the ball crossing the line and something of a similar shape, size and consistency doing the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Red Right Hand said: Also, how could the technology distinguish between the ball crossing the line and something of a similar shape, size and consistency doing the same? There’s a chip in the ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonM88 Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 10 minutes ago, Davefevs said: There’s a chip in the ball Not with the hawk eye system. It’s done with 6 cameras that use triangulation to locate the ball. No chip to be seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elhombrecito Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 14 minutes ago, Davefevs said: There’s a chip in the ball There is not. All done via cameras. 3 minutes ago, JasonM88 said: Not with the hawk eye system. It’s done with 6 cameras that use triangulation to locate the ball. No chip to be seen. Beat me to it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View from the Dolman Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 There's a decent explanation of it here... http://pulse-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/test/HawkEye/document/2015/08/10/6546e487-0c72-45f9-b4f2-3d45f649ae1f/Hawk-Eye's_GLT_How_it_Works.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.