Jump to content
IGNORED

Team for Wolves


BCFCGav

Recommended Posts

Amazing win tonight, and as much as I just wanna savour it, it’s got me thinking. 

Andi has clearly tweaked his back, and all others involved tonight worked ridiculously hard to turn no points into three. Considering this plus our strength in depth, I’d like changes on Sunday to give our ‘A’s’ a bit of a rest.

I’d like to see Baker, Kelly, Semenyo and Palmer all start, plus Walsh and Watkins if ready. Hakeeb on the bench maybe. But LJ does indeed know best! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a tough one for me. Think we need this distraction but also need to keep minutes rolling for some players. You don’t want to change too much but you want to rest some. 

FF

Wright Webster Baker Kelly

Adelakun Pack Morrell Eliasson

Palmer

Taylor

Max, Diedhiou, O’Dowda, Pisano, Brownhill, Paterson, Dasilva

Try to get Diedhiou and O’Dowda on for 30 minutes as these are players that, to me, perform better when playing consistently. 

Taylor probably deserves a start as does Palmer. Keeping Wright, Baker and Kelly sharp in case needed. Morrell been excellent in cup so has to keep going. Adelakun wild card. May not even make bench and could see Semenyo. Idk feel like we see one of those two with Weimann rested(assuming/hoping not too bad). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kelly needs another start, going back to the bench would be a real put down after the performance today, give him a chance to stick in a good performance, if he doesn't have one it could then be chalked up to playing prem opposition. Hopefully see Palmer play a big role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, this cup game is coming at the perfect time.  We’ve had a real mentally tough game tonight, and a break from the league is a good thing imho.

LJ to evaluate the fatigue from a sports science point of view and go from there.

Wright for Pisano - he put in a shift tonight and I worry about him hamstrings

Baker for either Kalas or Webster

Dasilva in for Kelly

Morrell for Brownhill

Eliasson for Weimann

Taylor for Diedhiou

Palmer for Paterson

so that’s:

Fielding / Wright, CB, Baker, Dasilva / Eliasson, Pack, Morrell, O’Dowda / Palmer / Taylor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

For me, this cup game is coming at the perfect time.  We’ve had a real mentally tough game tonight, and a break from the league is a good thing imho.

LJ to evaluate the fatigue from a sports science point of view and go from there.

Wright for Pisano - he put in a shift tonight and I worry about him hamstrings

Baker for either Kalas or Webster

Dasilva in for Kelly

Morrell for Brownhill

Eliasson for Weimann

Taylor for Diedhiou

Palmer for Paterson

so that’s:

Fielding / Wright, CB, Baker, Dasilva / Eliasson, Pack, Morrell, O’Dowda / Palmer / Taylor

Think Morrell starting could be really interesting, try and work out what level he's really at, a good performance against wolves and a few others in the rest of the season and some league 1 clubs would probably be interested in taking him on loan next season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with most re changes.

As always we want to win with no injuries and as always only Lj will know the true fitness of players so we will see on Sunday the best possible team for the occasion.

We have a run of Sat /Tues league games where the coaching staff really earn their money and I'm glad we fans don't have to make those calls. Such high league stakes now especially at Norwich at Boro. Magic months for City fans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JonDolman said:

                 Fielding

Wright Kalas Webster Dasilva 

                 Brownhill

          Morrell   Palmer 

Eliasson                    O'Dowda 

                 Diedhiou

 

Brownhill so deep? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wolves will play a strong team as they must fancy their chances of getting to the final. To make wholesale changes as many are suggesting would be a surrender, we don't need that. There is a full week to the next match, so simply dependent on fitness, pick a team to win, and keep the momentum and the buzz going

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JonDolman said:

                 Fielding

Wright Kalas Webster Dasilva 

                 Brownhill

          Morrell   Palmer 

Eliasson                    O'Dowda 

                 Diedhiou

 

Not sure about Brownhill in that deep role.

Not that he isn't a good player and not that we don't need someone back there...but Brownhill, don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Not sure about Brownhill in that deep role.

Not that he isn't a good player and not that we don't need someone back there...but Brownhill, don't know.

He put him there last night as he's more attack minded and we were chasing the game.  As Pack only played a partial game I'd expect him to start certainly with Palmer and maybe also Morrell.  I'd definitely play Kelly LB as he needs gametime to play himself back into form and I think he responds to a defensive challenge. Wright and Baker will both play.  Decision is who is left out. We could match Wolves and go to 3 at the back which would mean both JDS and LK play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Bard said:

He put him there last night as he's more attack minded and we were chasing the game.  As Pack only played a partial game I'd expect him to start certainly with Palmer and maybe also Morrell.  I'd definitely play Kelly LB as he needs gametime to play himself back into form and I think he responds to a defensive challenge. Wright and Baker will both play.  Decision is who is left out. We could match Wolves and go to 3 at the back which would mean both JDS and LK play. 

True, but QPR are quite reactive at times.

Vs Wolves, a side who like in certain games to pass it around, to attack certainly in general- or even when counter attacking they do so aggressively, that extra protection is needed. Pack deeper, maybe Brownhill and Palmer as the central 2 in the 4-1-4-1.

3 at the back would be interesting. Wright at RB would actually facilitate that in-game i.e. certain phases we're 3-5-2, other times 4 at the back, ability to interchange even more as we saw in our golden period last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Not sure about Brownhill in that deep role.

Not that he isn't a good player and not that we don't need someone back there...but Brownhill, don't know.

I thought he was the best player on the pitch against Huddersfield in that role. Worth seeing how he does there again imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...