Jump to content
IGNORED

James Bond 25 (Merged)


phantom

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, Baba Yaga said:

Bill Gates | Bill gates, Evler, Galeri

Apparently this is the inside of Bill Gate's home, Dr No much? And just to confirm Gates is definitely not a doctor!

Surely thats a picture, not an actual tank, or otherwise has Bill Gates hired the worlds tallest man to scuba diver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they say insane numbers I wonder how close they're talking to the production cost, if the studio can make their money back they may see it as close as a win for now rather than an a bit better than Inception level returns. 

If it was sorted soon, could imagine a christmas debut for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Wikipedia, No Time To Die had a budget of $250million.

I guess they'll want to make a profit, so it'd cost a streaming service at least $300million?

I don't know how much Amazon paid for Borat 2, but that would have been a much lower budget film. If Netflix/Apple/Amazon pay for Bond, it's hard to see how they'd ever make their money back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, The Batman said:

That Bruce Wayne is an absolute tool. Thankfully we've managed to avoid being in the same room as one another for years now. 

I’m sure Batman therefore wouldn’t react to someone simply saying ‘Martha’....... :fear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/10/2020 at 08:16, Selred said:

If this goes to a streaming service it'll be the final nail in the coffin for cinemas sadly. 

I’ve still kind of expected a movie studio to experiment with buying a cinema chain and release their films in them. They’d get entire ticket sales and confectionary income, only a couple of screens to account for less films. But could be filmed if 2/3 teamed up, they plan their release dates around the others and could have a cinema filled with release dates year round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Lrrr said:

I’ve still kind of expected a movie studio to experiment with buying a cinema chain and release their films in them. They’d get entire ticket sales and confectionary income, only a couple of screens to account for less films. But could be filmed if 2/3 teamed up, they plan their release dates around the others and could have a cinema filled with release dates year round. 

Isn't that just a normal cinema? I mean most commercial films are only from a handful of studios... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Selred said:

Isn't that just a normal cinema? I mean most commercial films are only from a handful of studios... 

yeah but studios only take a portion of ticket sales don’t they? Could be more viable for them if they received everything rather than the cinema chain making money. I can’t see them wanting to put everything out on streaming services even if there’s a charge, look how little Mulan made compared to other Disney remakes of animated films. Being in cinemas is what they want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lrrr said:

yeah but studios only take a portion of ticket sales don’t they? Could be more viable for them if they received everything rather than the cinema chain making money. I can’t see them wanting to put everything out on streaming services even if there’s a charge, look how little Mulan made compared to other Disney remakes of animated films. Being in cinemas is what they want. 

Cinema's arent the profit maker you think they are. It makes much more sense to lease the films to cinema chains who already have the set up, in locations etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Selred said:

Cinema's arent the profit maker you think they are. It makes much more sense to lease the films to cinema chains who already have the set up, in locations etc.

Yeah but I’m talking about an alternative to streaming rather than being the final nail in the coffin for cinema chains. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lrrr said:

Yeah but I’m talking about an alternative to streaming rather than being the final nail in the coffin for cinema chains. 

But why not just show it in cinemas rather than set their own up? 

There is no benefit for them to set up their own, it won't be worth the investment. 

The reason isn't the cinemas are taking a %, but streaming services are offering a lot of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Selred said:

But why not just show it in cinemas rather than set their own up? 

There is no benefit for them to set up their own, it won't be worth the investment. 

The reason isn't the cinemas are taking a %, but streaming services are offering a lot of money.

Sorry probably not explaining it well, rather than cinema chains all but going bust and streaming services becoming the norm to release new films, im suggesting studios take over the existing facilities of cinema chains rather than those chains go unused and out of business completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Lrrr said:

Sorry probably not explaining it well, rather than cinema chains all but going bust and streaming services becoming the norm to release new films, im suggesting studios take over the existing facilities of cinema chains rather than those chains go unused and out of business completely.

But the reason they are going bust is because of the pandemic plus films being sold to streaming services.

Just sell the films to cinemas first, and then cinemas would survive. Bond should of been the saviour of the cinemas this winter, now they are running dross left over and no-one wants to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got the whole box set in the loft somewhere but I can't be arsed to go and find it. Maybe in the new year I will have a look. 

Quantum of Solace was on itv2 last night. Said earlier in this thread that even though its the worst film I've ever seen, gonna watch it again to see if it as awful as I remember. 

Olga Kurylenko though. ????

MV5BNmVhY2Q1Y2UtMzJlYS00OTVkLTkzMDgtN2Qz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't particularly enjoy the big meeting scene in Spectre, in contrast there is a part in QoS where the criminals have a meeting in the opera which I thought was far better.

Also didn't find the ending when Bond gets drilled in the head that good at the end of Spectre.

I can't defend the song or the badly edited action scenes in QoS which are off putting but other than that I don't mind it, even the ending which apparently because of a writers strike was written in part by Craig himself wasn't that bad (if a little boring), I liked it when he got back the agent who made Vesper corrupt but I understand lots of people hate the movie because they see the movie as a poor sequel to Casino Royale. Don't think Dominic Greene was as bad as people make out either.

Would be funny to hear the reasons why people hate this movie though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...