Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

It would be interesting to see what the ground valuation is and when it was last reviewed (there are good reasons why regularly reviewing isn't a good idea.)

Clearly there's unlikely to be buyer for a sports stadium so with change of use and consequential CIL and S106 liabilities any gross value might likely be significantly reduced.

From memory Sainsbury's valued the land at about , or at least offered £20m ish. If I remember correctly , this was four times what it was valued as housing development land.

As an aside, a mate who works at the UWE is convinced that talks are on going for the new stadium. Not sure if this is Wael just trying to make the club a better prospect for purchase, or there is a real chance. To me it seems odd for a club to sign away an asset , just so they could rent again. Just as strange for the UWE to build a stadium or donate the land to a football club. It does feel a little like Wael is trying to polish a turd to get interest in them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 1960maaan said:

From memory Sainsbury's valued the land at about , or at least offered £20m ish

Agree and key being that they soon realised it was worth nothing near given the change in the market. On residential development CIL/S106 can take as much as 40% of the enhanced value to the developer. I was once responsible for a B1 property with a book value of £12m which, when revalued for potential sui generis occupation, dropped to £7m. So a £12m book price stadium is likely to be worth far less as a residential land proposition.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appreciate and not criticising your posting BTRFTG , but plebs like me get easily confused and so here are the results of my Googling to try and understand your valued input:

Sui Generis Law and Legal Definition. Sui generis is a Latin term which means of its own kind/genus. It is something that is unique in its characteristics. The expression is often used in analytic philosophy to indicate an idea, an entity, or a reality which cannot be included in a wider concept

What is a section 106?

Planning obligations, also known as Section 106 agreements (based on that section of The 1990 Town & Country Planning Act) are private agreements made between local authorities and developers and can be attached to a planning permission to make acceptable development which would otherwise be unacceptable in planning 
 
What is a CIL?
 
The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is a charge that local authorities can set on new development in order to raise funds to help fund the infrastructure, facilities and services - such as schools or transport improvements - which are needed to support new homes and businesses in the areas.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BTRFTG said:

Agree and key being that they soon realised it was worth nothing near given the change in the market. On residential development CIL/S106 can take as much as 40% of the enhanced value to the developer. I was once responsible for a B1 property with a book value of £12m which, when revalued for potential sui generis occupation, dropped to £7m. So a £12m book price stadium is likely to be worth far less as a residential land proposition.

Does anyone know the acreage of the Mem ? The nature of the residential development (if that is what will be most acceptable alternative use to the planners and professional opposers) will determine the value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Loon plage said:

Does anyone know the acreage of the Mem ? The nature of the residential development (if that is what will be most acceptable alternative use to the planners and professional opposers) will determine the value.

Total site is 3.3 Hectares.

Under the lapsed consents Sainsbury's, in addition to funding local roadworks, were liable for @£1.2m of CIL contributions and had to hand over 40% of the proposed residential developments as affordable housing.

Edited by BTRFTG
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BTRFTG said:

Total site is 3.3 Hectares.

Under the lapsed consents Sainsbury's, in addition to funding local roadworks, were liable for @£1.2m of CIL contributions and had to hand over 40% of the proposed residential developments as affordable housing.

Blimey be interesting to see how much affordable housing the council would try for across the whole site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Loon plage said:

Blimey be interesting to see how much affordable housing the council would try for across the whole site.

Norm is equivalent value of 40% of increase in asset value for the permission. It's a massive, 'hidden' tax that few have cottoned onto. You buy a new build house/flat and 40% goes straight to the local authority to subsidise social and affordable housing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BTRFTG said:

Norm is equivalent value of 40% of increase in asset value for the permission. It's a massive, 'hidden' tax that few have cottoned onto. You buy a new build house/flat and 40% goes straight to the local authority to subsidise social and affordable housing.

Be an interesting stand off methinks if it ever goes down the planning route because a developer will need a higher proportion of market value units to cover the cost of the acquisition of the site plus normal profit. This ain't exactly a greenfield site with hope value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Rich said:

Hope they've got planning permission for that. Very close to those houses.

Now that would be a serious gift if that had to come down - who is going to find out then........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wood_red said:

Now that would be a serious gift if that had to come down - who is going to find out then........

The only PP is for the retrospective application for the erection/replacement of their new stands, which they forgot to apply for last year. Not sure if PP is required for the TV screen, I would guess that it is, so no current application is visible on the council Planning site. Surely they'd have learned from the last time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cityal said:

I was wondering if their right to light was impeded by the screen too.

Looks like it is, and they have an historic right to that light. It might be further away than it looks though and the angle of light is very important to consider as well. Very complicated laws to interpret just from a picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SirColinOfMansfield said:

 

Wow! Looks like the value of the Mem has just doubled ...

NewScreen.jpg.81768ef790b5ff98173435306fd700dc.jpg

First game of the season, whoever they sign to play up front is very liable to smash a gert big hole in that, as he races through, one on one with the keeper..!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

First game of the season, whoever they sign to play up front is very liable to smash a gert big hole in that, as he races through, one on one with the keeper..!

Then they'd be awarded a penalty and the keeper sent off. All in the first five minutes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

It's getting slightly depressing reading their board.  All the clever kids have wised up to the absolute shambles thast is the current ownership and the absolute weapon that is Henbury Gas.

All the clever kids? Come on.....there ain't that many!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...