Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, BS2 Red said:

I can’t see it ever happening. There’s nothing in it for City, we don’t need them.

And for Rovers? They would never want to support a club that plays at Ashton Gate owned by Steve Lansdown.

If the 15ers go bust, then they either disappear or a small phoenix club will be formed.

More of a shite hawk than a Phoenix actually. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/03/2020 at 10:19, steviestevieneville said:

After your lot activity wanting us to go bust in 82 and trying to get your hands on Ashton gate. The block by rovers over a bail out by the council. I for one would celebrate joyously if you went bust ( not that I think it’ll happen) . Bring people together !?? when it’s suits you and are in the shit. Boot on the other foot you’d have it on our throats . Not a chance in hell it would happen . 

totally agree .vile club vile fans hope they go bust soon .

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Let's be realistic though they are a VERY long way away from folding

Yes they are in a financial mess, but so are many other clubs up and down the country

I wouldn't want them to go out of existence, because that puts an end to their suffering

Let them drop through the leagues like Boston United did, years and years of suffering

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BS2 Red said:

I can’t see it ever happening. There’s nothing in it for City, we don’t need them.

And for Rovers? They would never want to support a club that plays at Ashton Gate owned by Steve Lansdown.

If the 15ers go bust, then they either disappear or a small phoenix club will be formed.

What league would they be admitted to once reformed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

You would feel so sorry for the tiny teams in `Division 8` who would have to put up with the `loyal and true` descending on them and trashing their grounds.

If they can't drum up more than 6k in div 3, I can't imagine too many turning up for a div 8 game.  They would still take 10k away mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wendyredredrobin said:

If they can't drum up more than 6k in div 3, I can't imagine too many turning up for a div 8 game.  They would still take 10k away mind.

There were no end of problems with Hereford fans and to a certain extent Torquay when they were in Conference South so imagine their meatheads going to some village side...…...…….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

There were no end of problems with Hereford fans and to a certain extent Torquay when they were in Conference South so imagine their meatheads going to some village side...…...…….

Cricket on the village green would take on whole new meaning..... And the horses in nearby fields be bricking it too... 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bcfc01 said:

I would think any phoenix team would have to start up at level 8 or 9 - Southern League Division One or Western League Premier at best.

But, if when it comes to it, they won't be that organised imo.

 

 

 

It's the apathy of their fans that will see them go under. Apathy and years of under investment.

And they will still try and blame us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, archie andrews said:

Cricket on the village green would take on whole new meaning..... And the horses in nearby fields be bricking it too... 

Not to mention the local canines.

Then there is the question of where they will play once the mem has been sold as development land to repay the Wally family.

Edited by wendyredredrobin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Lanterne Rouge said:

There were no end of problems with Hereford fans and to a certain extent Torquay when they were in Conference South so imagine their meatheads going to some village side...…...…….

You don’t need to imagine it...! 
 

Just watch the highlights from their 2014-15 season..! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming Rovers go into liquidation, would Miah actually want to watch just one team in Bristol?

When their stand caught fire and burnt down their trophy cabinet in the early 80s, they played at the Gate for a few matches.

My memory might be different to the actual stats but  I think they went from 6000 to just over 4000. The main reason for Rovers fans not attending was because they wouldn't  attend a match at the Gate.

Assuming that the trend continues on this hypothesis, an extra 4k would be healthy financially for Steve and of course Maggie. 

As a nod to Rovers fans, we could make our away kit either Blue n White quarters or Purple and Lime quarters. I get the feeling most would choose the latter!

If anyone could design a purple n lime quartered shirt and post it, it would be interesting to see what it would look like. Thanks!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Norn Iron said:

As a nod to Rovers fans, we could make our away kit either Blue n White quarters or Purple and Lime quarters. I get the feeling most would choose the latter!

If anyone could design a purple n lime quartered shirt and post it, it would be interesting to see what it would look like. Thanks!

 

I think that isolation is affecting your rational though processes, Norn. Stay inside for a walk. ;)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/03/2020 at 08:42, Eddie Hitler said:

Not this time Bert.

Debt to Dwane Sports up to £16.2m from £13.1m. 

Interest payable on that £700k so 4.8% which isn't unreasonable now that a chunk of that is unsecured by exceeding the value of the ground; vaued at £11m.

The going concern note is more standardised suggesting that it was less of an issue - Dwane Sports will have provided proof of funds.

image.png.918c7c44d2c4e6a5cf05d062f999ec6e.png

 

As above post operating loss before player sales £4m up from £3.6m but include the interest and it's £4.7m up from £4.1m.

 

In some ways this a a smaller verison of the way that City runs its business with an acceptable ongoing budgeted loss; with our operating loss before player trading being a much larger £18m.

So if the AQs are genuinely rich and are choosing to supprt Rovers as the Lansdowns support City then there is no reason to suppose that they won't keep going as they are.

Obviously there remain the questions about the ground and the training ground but financially they're looking ok within the context of the mad world of football finances.

Tbh I'm surprised as they are now very much underwater in terms of their investment but are continuing as they were.  Also remember that this is 30 June 2019 so that debt is now going to be at least £20m vs the £11m valuation on the ground so approaching £10m underwater and they're unlikely to receiev that from selling.  IIRC £6m was thr quoted figure paid.

There were no post balance sheet events noted so if they have capitalised the loan it was after the date of signing being 20 Feb 2020.

 

Quoting myself but I've revisited the accounts and the guarantee is there, again given by Hani, and buried away within the accounting policies.

image.png.3b5b8b76b64da22978f5ef2a429eef79.png

 

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04501223/filing-history

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

Quoting myself but I've revisited the accounts and the guarantee is there, again given by Hani, and buried away within the accounting policies.

image.png.3b5b8b76b64da22978f5ef2a429eef79.png

 

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04501223/filing-history

Is that to June 2020 then, considering these accounts were for June 2019? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

Quoting myself but I've revisited the accounts and the guarantee is there, again given by Hani, and buried away within the accounting policies.

image.png.3b5b8b76b64da22978f5ef2a429eef79.png

 

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04501223/filing-history

"confirmed his intention to maintain"

Rather than "confirmed to maintain"

Bit of a difference with one being a cop out and the other being definitive.

Isn't the usual wording "guarantee to maintain support" ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...