Jump to content
IGNORED

Adam Webster - Update - Sold to Brighton


Red Army 75

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Vil1 said:

Ye the Ivorian striker that we sold again. As for fammy he cant control a pet hamster let alone a football. Most of his goals were flukes bounced of his foot when trying to control it

Yes that's what a contract is

Some lucky goals yes but some very good finishes in here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Vil1 said:

Players have contracts just like me and you. About time they start honouring it instead of jumping ship for money. You tell them their staying and thats it. Someone name me a replacement 

 

3 minutes ago, chinapig said:

So an employer should have the right to prevent an employee from taking another job?

The retain and transfer system went out with Jimmy Hill.

 

2 minutes ago, Vil1 said:

Ye the Ivorian striker that we sold again. As for fammy he cant control a pet hamster let alone a football. Most of his goals were flukes bounced of his foot when trying to control it

Yes that's what a contract is

While the player is under contract the club can reject any offers for him.

However, back in the real world, just how do you think a young  player would react when he heard that his club had "prevented" him from the chance of  lifetime i.e. playing in the premier league, and of setting himself up for life financially with a salary of £2m+ pa?

In cloud cuckoo land we would all like to think they would react positively with the club pleading for them to give us one more season and then go, especially when the player has a history of injury and could be one injury away from being out for a long period. In reality, it would almost certainly affect the player's mindset, no matter how professionally he tried to react. Are the club going to take that risk when £20m is on the table?

Also, we've just spent £17m give or take, on Kalas, Dasilva, Palmer, Szmodics and Bentley. You want SL to spend really big on a striker, so just where is that money meant to come from? ( In asking that question Im taking a calculated guess that ffp rules are an alien concept to you)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, downendcity said:

 

 

While the player is under contract the club can reject any offers for him.

However, back in the real world, just how do you think a young  player would react when he heard that his club had "prevented" him from the chance of  lifetime i.e. playing in the premier league, and of setting himself up for life financially with a salary of £2m+ pa?

In cloud cuckoo land we would all like to think they would react positively with the club pleading for them to give us one more season and then go, especially when the player has a history of injury and could be one injury away from being out for a long period. In reality, it would almost certainly affect the player's mindset, no matter how professionally he tried to react. Are the club going to take that risk when £20m is on the table?

Also, we've just spent £17m give or take, on Kalas, Dasilva, Palmer, Szmodics and Bentley. You want SL to spend really big on a striker, so just where is that money meant to come from? ( In asking that question Im taking a calculated guess that ffp rules are an alien concept to you)

 

On the 13 mill plus add ons for kelly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tears in rain said:

 

This guy looks like the goalscorer we need.

Who does he play for and I hope City are looking at him. How much do you think wended to pay to get him here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bristol Rob said:

For all of you sad that he looks to be going and our squad will be weaker, for those who can't believe the transfer fee and for those debating if we have a ready made replacement already in the squad, spare a thought.

A thought for Ipswich. For the owners and the fans. People who thought they had a half tidy defender who was rarely fit and who probably thought they had one over us when we lumped out strong money on him.

Turns out, he was fit, and he can indeed play.

That is one hell of a 12 month return.

KERCHING!

Ipswich due £1.85m if 10%, £3.7m if 20%

39 minutes ago, Vil1 said:

Yet again sell our best players fekin waste of time. You want to get to premier then keep your best players. We dont need the money!!!!!!!!!! And lansdown dont want to get there anyway. Same old bull. Its not about money its about getting to the promised land. Best centre back we had in years and your all idiots if you think this is good buisness 

School holidays Vil1?  Aren’t you a teacher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vil1 said:

Owel agree to disagree im disappointed we let him go. Same with kodja reid etc if we had kept them then were would we be now. We dont need the money

As @Mr Popodopolous covered in his post , yes , I’d agree , at some point we do need to keep our best players for a period and have a full on go

One things for sure , however excited people are at getting in 20/22 million the easiest way to get that coming in , and about 200 odd million on top is to get promoted to the Premier Cash Circus 

When is the dilemma 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Vil1 said:

On the 13 mill plus add ons for kelly

You mean the £13m that helped fund the £17m or so purchases of Kalas, Dasilva, Palmer and Bentley?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, downendcity said:

This guy looks like the goalscorer we need.

Who does he play for and I hope City are looking at him. How much do you think wended to pay to get him here?

Oh so you dig out the best goal he scored what about all the misses. You cant be serious anyone who watches him can see. No movement. No touch. No brain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Vil1 said:

EIl tell you how lansdown is literally a billonaire. Spend it on a 22 mill forward then fair enough but not the crap french shite we been buying

What planet have you been on? It’s nothing to do with SL and his money...its all to do with Club turnover and ffp rules.He is not allowed to just throw more millions in (on top of those he has already invested)...maybe if the club increased ticket prices to Prem league levels say £50 a match or £100 then we could afford it ...oh no we couldn’t, because we would not fill the seats ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, downendcity said:

This guy looks like the goalscorer we need.

Who does he play for and I hope City are looking at him. How much do you think wended to pay to get him here?

Bet he could develop and improve in a couple of seasons here ......

oh......

 

 

 

 

 

( Being naughty and playing devils advocate here)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, downendcity said:

 

 

While the player is under contract the club can reject any offers for him.

However, back in the real world, just how do you think a young  player would react when he heard that his club had "prevented" him from the chance of  lifetime i.e. playing in the premier league, and of setting himself up for life financially with a salary of £2m+ pa?

In cloud cuckoo land we would all like to think they would react positively with the club pleading for them to give us one more season and then go, especially when the player has a history of injury and could be one injury away from being out for a long period. In reality, it would almost certainly affect the player's mindset, no matter how professionally he tried to react. Are the club going to take that risk when £20m is on the table?

Also, we've just spent £17m give or take, on Kalas, Dasilva, Palmer, Szmodics and Bentley. You want SL to spend really big on a striker, so just where is that money meant to come from? ( In asking that question Im taking a calculated guess that ffp rules are an alien concept to you)

 

Contracts are theoretically binding but there is no need for players to formally ask for transfers these days - there was a good piece about this on the FourFourTwo site recently. They just let it be known via their agent and the media that they want to go.

Contracts afford a degree of protection to both parties but they don't in practice make any difference if a player wants to move. Or indeed a club wants to sack a manager.

There is little point in forcing a player to see out his contract, so the club needs to ensure it gets the best price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, davidoldfart said:

What planet have you been on? It’s nothing to do with SL and his money...its all to do with Club turnover and ffp rules.He is not allowed to just throw more millions in (on top of those he has already invested)...maybe if the club increased ticket prices to Prem league levels say £50 a match or £100 then we could afford it ...oh no we couldn’t, because we would not fill the seats ..

Do you know the ffp rules obviously not 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...