Jump to content
IGNORED

SIGNED : Tomas Kalas - 4 Year deal


Ska Junkie

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Monkeh said:

Twitter is about as reliable as kachina, the exclusive has come from Gregor mcboatface,

he hasn’t got anything right or exclusive since he started work experience at the post

Its wholly ironic that you don't understand irony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brilliant if true. But remember this really just about gets us back to last years squad.

Hoping Antoine Semenyo  comes through up front but that's a calculated gamble. Even if he does I think we need a CM & RB in that order if we want a realistic to have a chance of automatic promotion.

But c'mon, this is starting to get interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Major Isewater said:

Do you think Webster will stay if we sign Kalas ?

Or, switching it around, they might hate each other and if Webster goes, Kalas will definitely sign. Lateral thinking, see.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The hand of RO'D said:

Webster won't leave this season. Why would we make big statements with signing kalas and JDS and then flog webdini. It makes no sense. 

Well it wouldn’t be flogging him. It would be regretfully letting him go while counting about one million 20 pound notes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sleepy1968 said:

Brilliant if true. But remember this really just about gets us back to last years squad.

Hoping Antoine Semenyo  comes through up front but that's a calculated gamble. Even if he does I think we need a CM & RB in that order if we want a realistic to have a chance of automatic promotion.

But c'mon, this is starting to get interesting.

Agree, we do need atleast a couple more quality additions but providing we don’t sell Webster, reuniting what was in my opinion the best defensive partnership in the Championship by some distance last season is a massive coup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BCFC Richard said:

Want it on the OS but quite a few places reporting this as done. football insider saying 2.5 - 3m which would be amazing.

Then McGregor from the Post claiming it would be a record fee for the club, which for a player like Kalas seems much more likely and well worth the fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The hand of RO'D said:

And for what? We have a billionaire owner. Do we need the money? 

SL himself has said he won’t stand in the way of players in regards to PL clubs and that the club needs to be self sustainable. We don’t need the money but as long as we are a champ club we will have to sell players. Selling Webster this summer is not ideal but improves our options for the next 5 summers if we remain in the championship. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Robbored said:

Back in the dark ages............the entire set up at City is completely different these days. The club has moved into modernity since then.

Never a better word said. This city is a professional outfit and we are on an upward curve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, funky monkey said:

Saw a post saying between £2.5 - 3 mill ......?

If true then after getting the fees for Reid, Bryan and Flint, £13m for Kelly and if this is true for Kalas then we should have had Ashton negotiating Brexit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...