Jump to content
IGNORED

Nahki Wells - SIGNING CONFIRMED


Banjo Red

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, dave36 said:

I really don’t claim to be ITK but I have been trolled here this evening for posting what has been on other forums and feeds this evening - this forum is full of fu**wits who don’t have a ****ing clue! For a supporters forum there are quite a few idiots on here!

CTID and shove it up the rear to the opinionated ***** that don’t understand what a forum is

You claimed Burnley had announced it. They hadn't.

Would it have been a hardship to check before you posted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RedDave said:

But people seem to want Palmer in as well due to his previous form with Wells. Can only pick 11 players.  Preferably in formation that doesn’t mean we concede 4 goals a game! 

Johnson picks the team not people. Don't understand why you're getting so wound up up about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Negan said:

When all fit
 

Bentley 

Pereira Kalas Baker Dasilva 

Smith 

Weimann Palmer Eliasson 

Diedhiou Wells

Far too attacking, I think if you swap Diedhiou for Nagy and put him alongside Smith that's more realistic. 

I think tomorrow we'll start a 4-4-2. That side, but Nagy for Palmer and centre midfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RedDave said:

Funny how I get pelters saying I don’t know how Wells can fit in the side and then the same people giving me loads of crap post teams in a 4-1-5 kind of formation with just Smith in midfielder or with Wells on the wing.  

I understand everyone being excited about Wells but as soon as someone asks a footballing question of it on a football forum they get targeted.  

 

You know it’s not a 4-1-5 though don’t you.  Just as much as Tuesday’s 4231/4141 “morph”, wasn’t 424 or 415, just because Korey is the only DM.  You’re better than that RD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

You know it’s not a 4-1-5 though don’t you.  Just as much as Tuesday’s 4231/4141 “morph”, wasn’t 424 or 415, just because Korey is the only DM.  You’re better than that RD.

So what would you call this 

             Smith

Ellison. Palmer. Paterson

         Wells. Diedhiou 

Just because you could call that a 4-1-3-2 doesn’t mean it is one as the three is not a midfield.  

Thats closer to 4-1-5 than 4-1-3-2

Youre better than that DF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bazooka Joe said:

Nahki is a name that will fit well into several songs

Na Na Na (Banarama)

Ra Ra Rasputin (Boney M)

I'm sure there a plenty more.

Woss reckon?  - Nah !

Saw someone suggesting only fools and horses style

Nah, Nah, Nahki Wells, Nah, Nah, Nahki Wells, Nah, Nah, Nah, Nahki Wells etc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming no more business I'd go, in a 4-2-2-2:

Bentley - Hunt, Bakes, Williams, Jay - Smith, HNM - Pato, Eliasson (either wing) - Wells, Andi.

Tough call between Fam and Andi but I wouldn't want to lose Andi's running/defending from the front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...