old_eastender Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 I'd think it will be same starting 11 as against Reading, but with Massengo in place of Brownhill (please not COD again in CM). Reckon LJ will have Wells on the bench for this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 Will be tough competition for that number 8 shirt, hopefully a player will emerge and naturally fill the position. Massengo, Walsh, Nagy, Morrell should all see it as their oppertunity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 mad scenes if Wells scores Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDOXO Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 2 minutes ago, CiderHider said: Will be tough competition for that number 8 shirt, hopefully a player will emerge and naturally fill the position. Massengo, Walsh, Nagy, Morrell should all see it as their oppertunity 1 minute ago, CiderHider said: mad scenes if Wells scores Morrell I assume you mean in the summer or do you have info? However to paraphrase Kevin Keegan. I’d love it if Wells scores tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledAjax Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 27 minutes ago, CiderHider said: Will be tough competition for that number 8 shirt, hopefully a player will emerge and naturally fill the position. Massengo, Walsh, Nagy, Morrell should all see it as their oppertunity Massengo is 42 - 4 x 2 = 8. Coincidence? I think not. But seriously I'd play Massengo further forward as a no.8. He plays (roughly) there for the U19 national side and by all reports does a good job. I'd have him helping Fam and Weimann with the start of the press, winning the ball upfield as he's so good at using his body to win and then shield the ball, allowing runners to move. Tomorrow though? Start Wells surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 18 minutes ago, old_eastender said: I'd think it will be same starting 11 as against Reading, but with Massengo in place of Brownhill (please not COD again in CM). Reckon LJ will have Wells on the bench for this one. I think it'd be foolish to have him on the bench, he may not know his team-mates all that well yet but he knows the opposition better than any of our lot. There is no doubt in my mind he'll be looking to win over our fans and a goal against his old club would do that instantly. I fully expect LJ to talk to him about their tactics, players and then look to make the most of that inside information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercidered Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 23 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said: Massengo is 42 - 4 x 2 = 8. Coincidence? I think not. But seriously I'd play Massengo further forward. He plays there for the U19 national side and by all reports does a good job. I'd have him helping Fam and Weimann with the start of the press, winning the ball upfield as he's so good at using his body to win and then shield the ball, allowing runners to move. Tomorrow though? Start Wells surely? I don't think he will and don't call me Shirley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledAjax Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 9 minutes ago, supercidered said: I don't think he will Agreed, he's off for the mandatory 6 months with the U23s to learn the infamously tricky Johnson-ball system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsince1994 Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 32 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said: Massengo is 42 - 4 x 2 = 8. Coincidence? I think not. But seriously I'd play Massengo further forward as a no.8. He plays (roughly) there for the U19 national side and by all reports does a good job. I'd have him helping Fam and Weimann with the start of the press, winning the ball upfield as he's so good at using his body to win and then shield the ball, allowing runners to move. Tomorrow though? Start Wells surely? And he is 18. 1 x 8 = 8. Dun dun dun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFCGav Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 I think Massengo in for Josh tomorrow, and keep the rest the same, as per OP. Not sure where Wells head will be at regarding playing at Loftus Rd as an away player this soon. And I like Massengo, think he could use his energy and tenacity to work well for us defensively and offensively similarly to Josh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppyDAZE Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 Wells will come on as a second half sub to a mixture of boos and cheers. Then Eliasson will slip him in to.... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolman_Stand Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsince1994 Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 8 minutes ago, Dolman_Stand said: Took an hour and ten minutes to mock that one up eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolman_Stand Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 2 minutes ago, redsince1994 said: Took an hour and ten minutes to mock that one up eh? Not my handywork I can assure you, its on the Facebook group....really hope it's fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 2 hours ago, old_eastender said: I'd think it will be same starting 11 as against Reading, but with Massengo in place of Brownhill (please not COD again in CM). Reckon LJ will have Wells on the bench for this one. Don’t tell @Up The City! Wells 100% certain to start apparently ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppyDAZE Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 2 minutes ago, Dolman_Stand said: Not my handywork I can assure you, its on the Facebook group....really hope it's fake It IS. GMG wouldn't be coming straight out with this so soon, even had it happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsince1994 Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 1 minute ago, Dolman_Stand said: Not my handywork I can assure you, its on the Facebook group....really hope it's fake Yeah the real tweet is about our interest in Henriksen. At the top of the image the time is 15.20, no way that went under the radar for over an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 Unchanged if we don't sell anyone in the next few hours. We played very well. It's interesting if we win and play well again and keep a clean sheet. It would be 4 league wins in a row abd would be difficult to change for LJ. Though I'm sure he will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolas Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 5 hours ago, ExiledAjax said: Massengo is 42 - 4 x 2 = 8. Coincidence? I think not. But seriously I'd play Massengo further forward as a no.8. He plays (roughly) there for the U19 national side and by all reports does a good job. I'd have him helping Fam and Weimann with the start of the press, winning the ball upfield as he's so good at using his body to win and then shield the ball, allowing runners to move. Tomorrow though? Start Wells surely? Erm, i make that 76.......... 38 minutes ago, JonDolman said: Unchanged if we don't sell anyone in the next few hours. We played very well. It's interesting if we win and play well again and keep a clean sheet. It would be 4 league wins in a row abd would be difficult to change for LJ. Though I'm sure he will. Unchanged........?!?! Erm, Brownhill.....!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledAjax Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 4 minutes ago, nickolas said: Erm, i make that 76.......... - ≠ - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 5 minutes ago, nickolas said: Erm, i make that 76.......... Unchanged........?!?! Erm, Brownhill.....!! Yeah I meant that team minus Brownhill! Massengo sensible choice I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolas Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 2 minutes ago, JonDolman said: Yeah I meant that team minus Brownhill! Massengo sensible choice I think. Ha i know. You just know it will be COD though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 7 minutes ago, nickolas said: Ha i know. You just know it will be COD though! I don't mind COD to be honest. At least he was good briefly when he came on last game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curr Avon Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 11 minutes ago, nickolas said: Ha i know. You just know it will be COD though! Na. It'll be Massengo. Or maybe LJ will pull a rabbit out of the hat and play Tommy centrally. As for Wells, he's a better finisher than Diedhiou and will encourage us to pass and move rather than play long. We need to score earlier in games and bury some of those sweet passes from Eliasson. Why wait until the 70th minute? This City side is about putting fear into the opposition. A proper step up and I'm excited for the remainder of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 27 minutes ago, nickolas said: Erm, i make that 76.......... Unchanged........?!?! Erm, Brownhill.....!! I make it 34. Mathematical convention says you multiply / divide before you add or subtract. I am an effin geek....sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolman_Stand Posted January 31, 2020 Report Share Posted January 31, 2020 May not be the team for tomorrow as some of the new lads won't be available or up to speed but for me best 11 now would be Wells Paterson Palmer Eliasson Henrikksen Nagy Dasilva Benkovic Kalas Hunt Bentley Wollacott Baker Smith Massengo O'Dowda Diedhiou Weimann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 1, 2020 Report Share Posted February 1, 2020 10 hours ago, Dolman_Stand said: May not be the team for tomorrow as some of the new lads won't be available or up to speed but for me best 11 now would be Wells Paterson Palmer Eliasson Henrikksen Nagy Dasilva Benkovic Kalas Hunt Bentley Wollacott Baker Smith Massengo O'Dowda Diedhiou Weimann LJ will always play Weimann it seems. And I can't see him dropping Williams. Good problems to have for a manager. I like your team though. Would probably rather have Korey in there than Nagy with how Nagy has mainly looked so far. Though I know on a good day he is quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickolas Posted February 1, 2020 Report Share Posted February 1, 2020 11 hours ago, Davefevs said: I make it 34. Mathematical convention says you multiply / divide before you add or subtract. I am an effin geek....sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
real_bristol Posted February 1, 2020 Report Share Posted February 1, 2020 I’d be tempted with Palmer and Wells in for Brownhill (obvs) and Weimann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meh Posted February 1, 2020 Report Share Posted February 1, 2020 41 minutes ago, real_bristol said: I’d be tempted with Palmer and Wells in for Brownhill (obvs) and Weimann I think he may start same team with Wells and Palmer coming on after an hour as plan B if needed. Ultimately I think we may end up 3-5-2 again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.