Jump to content
IGNORED

Man City banned from Europe for two years FFP


And Its Smith

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, RedDave said:

No doubt this will be reduced to one year on appeal. Probably means Pep leaves in the summer.  I’m torn on FFP at the top level. Why is it okay for teams like Chelsea to build their base but then clubs that decide to do it a little later get punished?  

 For the teams in the premier league the simple answer is Leicester.  The top clubs got together and said we can't have that happening again. Hence how Ffp is structured in the Prem pretty much guarantees it wont happen again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Vincent Vega said:

 For the teams in the premier league the simple answer is Leicester.  The top clubs got together and said we can't have that happening again. Hence how Ffp is structured in the Prem pretty much guarantees it wont happen again.

What, like how all clubs have agreed to lose to Liverpool, to stop Leicester doing again this season..?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, without knowing the details of the rules... how can they possibly have broken European FFP but NOT premier League FFP..? 
Surely they must be on a par, if not more limited at PL level..?

In which case, when will they be docked points in the PL..? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

So, without knowing the details of the rules... how can they possibly have broken European FFP but NOT premier League FFP..? 
Surely they must be on a par, if not more limited at PL level..?

In which case, when will they be docked points in the PL..? 

Premier League FFP more relaxed. It is weird though as Championship is quite strict. Leeds needed a striker in Jan but couldn’t sign one other than on loan as knew it would push them past the FFP threshold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RedDave said:

Premier League FFP more relaxed. It is weird though as Championship is quite strict. Leeds needed a striker in Jan but couldn’t sign one other than on loan as knew it would push them past the FFP threshold. 

Ok, but surely PL rules must fall within UEFA rules..?! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

So, without knowing the details of the rules... how can they possibly have broken European FFP but NOT premier League FFP..? 
Surely they must be on a par, if not more limited at PL level..?

In which case, when will they be docked points in the PL..? 

£35m per year in the Prem. €30m (£25m) per accounting period (3 years) in UEFA competitions. 
I believe Man City’s issue is the source of their income. It seems their owners ‘influenced’ associated companies to sponsor them, boosting revenue, and meeting the limit. 

1 minute ago, Bar BS3 said:

Ok, but surely PL rules must fall within UEFA rules..?! 

The PL isn’t a UEFA competition so UEFA rules have nothing to do with the PL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

So, without knowing the details of the rules... how can they possibly have broken European FFP but NOT premier League FFP..? 
Surely they must be on a par, if not more limited at PL level..?

In which case, when will they be docked points in the PL..? 

Probably this season, when it means bugger all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AnotherDerbyFan said:

£35m per year in the Prem. €30m (£25m) per accounting period (3 years) in UEFA competitions. 
I believe Man City’s issue is the source of their income. It seems their owners ‘influenced’ associated companies to sponsor them, boosting revenue, and meeting the limit. 

The PL isn’t a UEFA competition so UEFA rules have nothing to do with the PL

Read about it a bit, not 100% sure, but believe it is the source of the income, not the amount as such.

FFP for UEFA seems to cap the amount the owners can put in. The leaked emails suggest of the £60m or whatever sponsorship from Etihad only £8m was coming from the company and the balance from the owner, and was being used by the owner as a way of hiding his contribution.

Not entirely sure that one should be against the rules and one not, arguably income is income, but that seems to be the basis of it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Bar BS3 said:

So, without knowing the details of the rules... how can they possibly have broken European FFP but NOT premier League FFP..? 
Surely they must be on a par, if not more limited at PL level..?

In which case, when will they be docked points in the PL..? 

PL FFP is very generous tbh. 

30m euros over 3 years the UEFA limit, whereas in PL it's £105m. 

The UEFA deductions maybe a bit more than the PL but it's very hard to fail FFP in the PL. They're fine now, this is for historic breaches. 

UEFA though, well done- well done indeed!! :clapping::clapping:

PSG next please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, RedDave said:

No doubt this will be reduced to one year on appeal. Probably means Pep leaves in the summer.  I’m torn on FFP at the top level. Why is it okay for teams like Chelsea to build their base but then clubs that decide to do it a little later get punished?  

To be fair to pep he will probably stay at Man City to try and stop the Liverpool juggernaut over the next few seasons,who I’m I trying to kid he will be offski to spend another boatload of money somewhere else where he can try and win the champions league 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RedDave said:

I doubt it will work like that. More likely an extra place will go into the qualifiers 

Nope as it stands Luke Freeman could be playing UCL footy ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man United finish 5th take man city's place. This is what happens when the Arabs take over a club and throw endless amounts of money around. Every time you fill up with petrol you fund man City. This has to be good news for all well run clubs like ours. Maybe this is why wally wont fund the sags at the minimal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RedDave said:

But if Man City are banned it won’t mean fifth place goes into champions league I doubt. Would expect extra place to be given for all the teams like Celtic, who go through qualifiers, to fight over 

Don't think so as the number of places are given out based on your teams performance in previous years, so England has 4 places, how they are decided would be up to the PL and FA, only time UEFA would get involved would be in a situation that would give us a situation where we had 6 teams, if someone wins the CL, but doesn't finish top 4 and an English team with the EL and don't finish top 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RedDave said:

But if Man City are banned it won’t mean fifth place goes into champions league I doubt. Would expect extra place to be given for all the teams like Celtic, who go through qualifiers, to fight over 

UEFA rule 4.08 states: "A club which is not admitted to the competition is replaced by the next best-placed club in the top domestic championship of the same association, provided the new club fulfils the admission criteria. In this case, the access list (see Annex A) is adjusted accordingly."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...