Jump to content

Welcome to One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums

Welcome to One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of One Team in Bristol - Bristol City Forums by signing in or creating an account.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Full access to all forums (not all viewable as guest)
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
  • Support OTIB with a premium membership

JonDolman

Wells signing has made us worse!

Recommended Posts

Not because of Wells being a bad player. No doubt he is a classy goal scorer at this level.

But before him LJ had briefly found a system and way of winning with Fam up top on his own. Pretty much the same as our great 11 wins and 4 draws in 15 run of games last season.

Okay we did lose to Birmingham playing that too, but one loss in 5, winning 4. Generally it looked solid in most of those games and had us winning. At this point I'm sure many would take that as something to move forward with in a season where we haven't played good football much anyway.

I remember a poster on here ( was it Reddave?) saying Wells is a bad signing. No doubt he got stick for this, but I completely get what he meant - that he won't fit in with what we have.

At previous clubs Wells has mainly been at his best when up top in a 4231 kind of formation as the main striker. With a Chair at QPR or Palmer or Izzy Brown behind him at Huddersfield.

He can hold it up pretty well for his size, he can even win headers. And with his pace, movement, work rate and good technique, he really fits a team with creativity in behind him.

He has that aggression as well, something a short striker up top on their own need against big centre halves. His finishing is superb with either foot. Whether I'm overrating him slightly or not. He is a goal scorer with pace who seems to like the lone role. We don't play him in that role though.

LJ for some reason seems to love playing 2 strikers. And it means Wells is dropping back a lot. I knew LJ would do this rather than bravely dropping Fam.

Instead of balls being played from a short distance behind Wells for him to run onto, in behind the defence, he is having to try and get onto flick ons. Drop back a lot to help our outnumbered midfield etc.

352 did not seem to fix the problem yesterday. Maybe that was down to the poor midfield, who knows. But I'm not liking what I see from LJ in trying to get the best out of him so far.

Edited by JonDolman
  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Aubergine 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At QPR, I believe he dropped back a lot. He’s always going to be someone who comes and searches for the ball.

You’re right though, his two chances came from short passes through. The one from Eliasson when he took a snapshot on the turn and just missed the far post showed his quality. I would really want to see him with Palmer playing him through.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Dastardly and Muttley said:

At QPR, I believe he dropped back a lot. He’s always going to be someone who comes and searches for the ball.

You’re right though, his two chances came from short passes through. The one from Eliasson when he took a snapshot on the turn and just missed the far post showed his quality. I would really want to see him with Palmer playing him through.

Yes he will, like I guess all strikers do in coming deep and showing for the ball to get attacks started. 

But so far it seems he's been coming back far too much because we are outnumbered in midfield and under pressure in games.

Or last night it seemed Fam at times was the one playing more in behind Wells, which is ridiculous as apart from the through pass against Leeds, Fam is not any good in that position.

4 minutes ago, Hampshire Red said:

Great Post. He has looked league 1 so far and you can't blame the other players or the coach if you miss open goals, (Leeds, WBA) and don't put in effort (Huddersfield) 

True he has missed some very good chances so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shock horror, we don’t play to a strikers strength and he fails to score,

wells makes the runs but we are too static slow and predictable for him to make an impact

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Hampshire Red said:

Great Post. He has looked league 1 so far and you can't blame the other players or the coach if you miss open goals, (Leeds, WBA) and don't put in effort (Huddersfield) 

What complete rubbish.

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Hampshire Red said:

Great Post. He has looked league 1 so far and you can't blame the other players or the coach if you miss open goals, (Leeds, WBA) and don't put in effort (Huddersfield) 

How can you possibly blame the strikers when they are getting absolutely no service & feeding off scraps. 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pair him with Weimann in a 3-5-2.

Weimann has better movement than Diedhiou...or as Dave suggested on another thread, 4-3-3 or 3-4-3 with Weimann-Wells-Eliasson.

Think Diedhiou and Wells could be an interesting Plan B but not Plan A, not for me.

  • Like 1
  • Rovers 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not so much Wells. It’s because Wiemann has been sacrificed for his inclusion.

Tbf the whole team are shite atm.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its worth remembering that we, as a fanbase were screaming out for a proven striker to play up with Fammy, and realistically , Wells was probably about the best we could get at the time. Now the team, and Wells have stopped scoring, I'm not sure that we should be moaning about a fox in the box type, that we all demanded, upsetting our style and not fitting in.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, The Horse With No Name said:

Its worth remembering that we, as a fanbase were screaming out for a proven striker to play up with Fammy, and realistically , Wells was probably about the best we could get at the time. Now the team, and Wells have stopped scoring, I'm not sure that we should be moaning about a fox in the box type, that we all demanded, upsetting our style and not fitting in.

We did not all demand this though. I didn't demand a striker up top with Fam as I've always said Fam is better on his own.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth remembering that at QPR Wells was scoring at about double the rate you'd expect given the number and quality of chances he was getting. He had a massive purple patch that catapulted him up the goal scoring charts. To expect him to come into a new team that wasn't (and still isn't) creating a high number of chances and continue that scoring rate was always dangerously hopeful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Monkeh said:

Shock horror, we don’t play to a strikers strength and he fails to score,

wells makes the runs but we are too static slow and predictable for him to

make an impact

 

Same scenario when Weimann played up front, lots of runs but never picked out. 
 

Is that because of the player, team formation we play or the manager not playing to the strengths of the player.

Personally think it’s a mixture of all 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hampshire Red said:

Great Post. He has looked league 1 so far and you can't blame the other players or the coach if you miss open goals, (Leeds, WBA) and don't put in effort (Huddersfield) 

Jesus Wept

After years and months of posts from you proclaiming LJ as the a reincarnation of God himself ,  and castigating and demeaning anyone who even dare to question him

You are slating and writing Wells off already (I did say at the time he’s decent but not the Messiah) 

 

Btw If he’s looked League 1 so far , he’s actually doing rather well as most of the rest are performing somewhere near Confernce level

  • Like 10
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, JonDolman said:

Not because of Wells being a bad player. No doubt he is a classy goal scorer at this level.

But before him LJ had briefly found a system and way of winning with Fam up top on his own. Pretty much the same as our great 11 wins and 4 draws in 15 run of games last season.

Okay we did lose to Birmingham playing that too, but one loss in 5, winning 4. Generally it looked solid in most of those games and had us winning. At this point I'm sure many would take that as something to move forward with in a season where we haven't played good football much anyway.

I remember a poster on here ( was it Reddave?) saying Wells is a bad signing. No doubt he got stick for this, but I completely get what he meant - that he won't fit in with what we have.

At previous clubs Wells has mainly been at his best when up top in a 4231 kind of formation as the main striker. With a Chair at QPR or Palmer or Izzy Brown behind him at Huddersfield.

He can hold it up pretty well for his size, he can even win headers. And with his pace, movement, work rate and good technique, he really fits a team with creativity in behind him.

He has that aggression as well, something a short striker up top on their own need against big centre halves. His finishing is superb with either foot. Whether I'm overrating him slightly or not. He is a goal scorer with pace who seems to like the lone role. We don't play him in that role though.

LJ for some reason seems to love playing 2 strikers. And it means Wells is dropping back a lot. I knew LJ would do this rather than bravely dropping Fam.

Instead of balls being played from a short distance behind Wells for him to run onto, in behind the defence, he is having to try and get onto flick ons. Drop back a lot to help our outnumbered midfield etc.

352 did not seem to fix the problem yesterday. Maybe that was down to the poor midfield, who knows. But I'm not liking what I see from LJ in trying to get the best out of him so far.

I actually disagree with you on this one. I still think he's exactly what we need but you have to consider his games at City:

QPR - win - came on as sub

Brum - loss - came on as sub

Derby - win - full and scored

(So limited gametime but going okay...)

Leeds - City totally dominated 

WBA - City totally dominated 

Hudds - City Totally dominated 

How much of the above is down to Wells? I think the issue was our negative mindset, chaotic shuffling of line up, and players struggling to execute basics let alone their potential. 

I think this forum is guilty of searching for one defining problem ie a particular player, or formation when in fact, a series of influences have contributed to our demise. 

But how Wells signing makes us worse I don't understand. He just needs to play in a settled side, clear in their roles, motivated, confident, fit, working together on the pitch, responding to their coaching (among others).

Those things are more the problem.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Pair him with Weimann in a 3-5-2.

Weimann has better movement than Diedhiou...or as Dave suggested on another thread, 4-3-3 or 3-4-3 with Weimann-Wells-Eliasson.

Think Diedhiou and Wells could be an interesting Plan B but not Plan A, not for me.

I've talked about the idea before, but I wonder whether Diedhiou could play as a wide targetman in a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1?

Would be fairly unconventional, but would enable Wells to play centrally with Palmer/Paterson in behind and Eliasson on the other wing. It would give him the chance to make runs to the back post which Eliasson's deliveries could be made for. 

Interesting video on the concept about Mandzukic 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, mozo said:

I actually disagree with you on this one. I still think he's exactly what we need but you have to consider his games at City:

QPR - win - came on as sub

Brum - loss - came on as sub

Derby - win - full and scored

(So limited gametime but going okay...)

Leeds - City totally dominated 

WBA - City totally dominated 

Hudds - City Totally dominated 

How much of the above is down to Wells? I think the issue was our negative mindset, chaotic shuffling of line up, and players struggling to execute basics let alone their potential. 

I think this forum is guilty of searching for one defining problem ie a particular player, or formation when in fact, a series of influences have contributed to our demise. 

But how Wells signing makes us worse I don't understand. He just needs to play in a settled side, clear in their roles, motivated, confident, fit, working together on the pitch, responding to their coaching (among others).

Those things are more the problem.

 

 

You've misunderstand my point. 

It's not that he's a bad signing. And it's not that he should make us worse. He should make us better.

It's LJ who has not managed so far to get the best out of him and got the team to benefit from his ability.

4141 with Fam up top was working.

Fitting in Wells into a 2 man attack with Fam we look a lot worse as a team.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, JonDolman said:

You've misunderstand my point. 

It's not that he's a bad signing. And it's not that he should make us worse. He should make us better.

It's LJ who has not managed so far to get the best out of him and got the team to benefit from his ability.

4141 with Fam up top was working.

Fitting in Wells into a 2 man attack with Fam we look a lot worse as a team.

 

That make sense most successful teams recently play with a lone striker or front 3

 

Edited by Monkeh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with the original argument is that we were also getting well beaten with this "system" ie Charlton on boxing day.

We all knew we needed a second main striker - Fam is too temperamental at risk of injury not to bring Wells in and having one of the leagues most effective strikers will not mess up any system - we just need better coaching to accommodate it.

I have no doubt we would have lost the last 3 without Wells - remember Barnsley and Luton without him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, JonDolman said:

Not because of Wells being a bad player. No doubt he is a classy goal scorer at this level.

But before him LJ had briefly found a system and way of winning with Fam up top on his own. Pretty much the same as our great 11 wins and 4 draws in 15 run of games last season.

Okay we did lose to Birmingham playing that too, but one loss in 5, winning 4. Generally it looked solid in most of those games and had us winning. At this point I'm sure many would take that as something to move forward with in a season where we haven't played good football much anyway.

I remember a poster on here ( was it Reddave?) saying Wells is a bad signing. No doubt he got stick for this, but I completely get what he meant - that he won't fit in with what we have.

At previous clubs Wells has mainly been at his best when up top in a 4231 kind of formation as the main striker. With a Chair at QPR or Palmer or Izzy Brown behind him at Huddersfield.

He can hold it up pretty well for his size, he can even win headers. And with his pace, movement, work rate and good technique, he really fits a team with creativity in behind him.

He has that aggression as well, something a short striker up top on their own need against big centre halves. His finishing is superb with either foot. Whether I'm overrating him slightly or not. He is a goal scorer with pace who seems to like the lone role. We don't play him in that role though.

LJ for some reason seems to love playing 2 strikers. And it means Wells is dropping back a lot. I knew LJ would do this rather than bravely dropping Fam.

Instead of balls being played from a short distance behind Wells for him to run onto, in behind the defence, he is having to try and get onto flick ons. Drop back a lot to help our outnumbered midfield etc.

352 did not seem to fix the problem yesterday. Maybe that was down to the poor midfield, who knows. But I'm not liking what I see from LJ in trying to get the best out of him so far.

Wells can play a number of roles up top including behind fam if needed. Our problem is a serious lack in midfield . It’s where any good side is at its strongest . Our current midfield must be one of the weakest in the league. 

  • Like 3
  • Hmmm 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

Wells can play a number of roles up top including behind fam if needed. Our problem is a serious lack in midfield . It’s where any good side is at its strongest . Our current midfield must be one of the weakest in the league. 

Seeing as I mistakenly disagreed with @JonDolman I'll try disagreeing with your post instead...!

I think we've got loads of quality midfielders. I've seen them play well numerous times. Then I've seen their performances deteriorate, just as I have from other players. There's something else compromising our cohesion...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Hampshire Red said:

Great Post. He has looked league 1 so far and you can't blame the other players or the coach if you miss open goals, (Leeds, WBA) and don't put in effort (Huddersfield) 

You talk utter shit.
 

But I fully support your right to do so!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Dullmoan Tone said:

The problem with the original argument is that we were also getting well beaten with this "system" ie Charlton on boxing day.

We all knew we needed a second main striker - Fam is too temperamental at risk of injury not to bring Wells in and having one of the leagues most effective strikers will not mess up any system - we just need better coaching to accommodate it.

I have no doubt we would have lost the last 3 without Wells - remember Barnsley and Luton without him.

We didn't play that 4141 with Fam up top in any of those games you say about that we lost, or in Barnsley game drew in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, mozo said:

Seeing as I mistakenly disagreed with @JonDolman I'll try disagreeing with your post instead...!

I think we've got loads of quality midfielders. I've seen them play well numerous times. Then I've seen their performances deteriorate, just as I have from other players. There's something else compromising our cohesion...

Mixture of the 2 for me, but Brownhill papered over a lot of cracks imo

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mozo said:

 

Leeds - City totally dominated 

WBA - City totally dominated 

Hudds - City Totally dominated 

 

 

 

Another one for the grammar police - I think you mean "City were totally dominated". At least, I hope you do!

I agree with you though that you can't judge any striker on those three games when our midfield was so over-run.

Edited by italian dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Midfield missing in so many respects, little service for one up top and a player less to provide for two up top, Wells is very capable of doing a Tomlin and coming back to get the ball, but that won’t happen with an ineffective midfield coached by an ineffective midfielder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it's got very little to do with playing 2 up top per se, but you have to play in certain ways to accommodate it. 

There was absolutely nothing wrong with the way we set up against WBA, it was the fact that we didn't commit to it, we started the game allowing WBA possession and being tight at the back, and we were able to draw the WBA defence up the pitch, and they are big but they are not quick, so we created the space in behind and we had the players to exploit this in COD, Eliasson, and Wells with Fam to win the flick ons for Wells to run onto. But we did not outside the first 2 minutes when COD a couple of times attacked the space in behind, do anything with it. 

I don't think it matters what system and players we put out as I think the instruction they are getting is all wrong and no matter what system we seem to put out we do not commit to a style that will make it work, couple that with the constant changes meaning players never get an understanding of how each other move and play its not going to look good. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, steviestevieneville said:

Wells can play a number of roles up top including behind fam if needed. Our problem is a serious lack in midfield . It’s where any good side is at its strongest . Our current midfield must be one of the weakest in the league. 

Agree on Wells but dunno about the midfield. These are good players, some m internationals. In short, I believe they can produce more than they do individuals and indeed as a collective. 

Not with the current setup and mindset however.

Brownhill,  think we may well miss him. At times a goal threat, versatility. Brownhill on the right able to come inside, or or pushed higher in central areas or indeed centrally is the middle of the three in a 4-2-3-1, this could've helped quite a bit. 

No doubt his flexibility and versatility was an asset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mozo said:

Seeing as I mistakenly disagreed with @JonDolman I'll try disagreeing with your post instead...!

I think we've got loads of quality midfielders. I've seen them play well numerous times. Then I've seen their performances deteriorate, just as I have from other players. There's something else compromising our cohesion...

What do you think it is?  answers on a postcard please!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JonDolman said:

4141 with Fam up top was working.

 

It was working in the sense that we were scraping decent results against some of the worst teams in the league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, JonDolman said:

Not because of Wells being a bad player. No doubt he is a classy goal scorer at this level.

But before him LJ had briefly found a system and way of winning with Fam up top on his own. Pretty much the same as our great 11 wins and 4 draws in 15 run of games last season.

Okay we did lose to Birmingham playing that too, but one loss in 5, winning 4. Generally it looked solid in most of those games and had us winning. At this point I'm sure many would take that as something to move forward with in a season where we haven't played good football much anyway.

I remember a poster on here ( was it Reddave?) saying Wells is a bad signing. No doubt he got stick for this, but I completely get what he meant - that he won't fit in with what we have.

At previous clubs Wells has mainly been at his best when up top in a 4231 kind of formation as the main striker. With a Chair at QPR or Palmer or Izzy Brown behind him at Huddersfield.

He can hold it up pretty well for his size, he can even win headers. And with his pace, movement, work rate and good technique, he really fits a team with creativity in behind him.

He has that aggression as well, something a short striker up top on their own need against big centre halves. His finishing is superb with either foot. Whether I'm overrating him slightly or not. He is a goal scorer with pace who seems to like the lone role. We don't play him in that role though.

LJ for some reason seems to love playing 2 strikers. And it means Wells is dropping back a lot. I knew LJ would do this rather than bravely dropping Fam.

Instead of balls being played from a short distance behind Wells for him to run onto, in behind the defence, he is having to try and get onto flick ons. Drop back a lot to help our outnumbered midfield etc.

352 did not seem to fix the problem yesterday. Maybe that was down to the poor midfield, who knows. But I'm not liking what I see from LJ in trying to get the best out of him so far.

Another example LJ doesn't actually know what he's doing and like I've already stated previously he can't identify the correct players needed to be consistent in key area's... we sell BR and don't replace his energy, we sell Webster and don't replace his dominance and leadership,  we sell are captain and engine and replace it with a player more rusty than the gates down the mem. I know must will say that's out of his hands but formation and reaction isn't and it's appalling. I'll tell you here and now you will see no reaction at Millwall and will get bullied and out fought with Fulham to follow and I think we all know how that will already end up.... JOHNSON OUT 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roe said:

It was working in the sense that we were scraping decent results against some of the worst teams in the league.

No easy games in this league. Luton beat Brentford last night, Barnsley and Wigan on good form and both currently winning tonight. 

So to win 4 in a row at this level is very hard. But also that system with Fam up top on his own won 11 and drew 4 in 15 game period last season.

A bit similar to those wins in our recent 4 game winning run recently. Not conceding many, but doing enough to win. Relying on Fam up top to be a handful and having a solid looking shape behind him dangerous on the counter attack.

I'm not saying that is how we should play. But it is an effective way, and it gets results.

Better than what we are currently watching. Wide open, not being able to pass the ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, mozo said:

I actually disagree with you on this one. I still think he's exactly what we need but you have to consider his games at City:

QPR - win - came on as sub

Brum - loss - came on as sub

Derby - win - full and scored

(So limited gametime but going okay...)

Leeds - City totally dominated 

WBA - City totally dominated 

Hudds - City Totally dominated 

How much of the above is down to Wells? I think the issue was our negative mindset, chaotic shuffling of line up, and players struggling to execute basics let alone their potential. 

I think this forum is guilty of searching for one defining problem ie a particular player, or formation when in fact, a series of influences have contributed to our demise. 

But how Wells signing makes us worse I don't understand. He just needs to play in a settled side, clear in their roles, motivated, confident, fit, working together on the pitch, responding to their coaching (among others).

Those things are more the problem.

 

 

Agree with this....and in fairness to @JonDolman (who I do like a good old debate with 😂😂😂) I don’t think his OP was trying to do that.

But to me, it has become very clear, we are a mess (of sorts). MIllwall is kill or cure (temporary cure probably more apt).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, italian dave said:

Another one for the grammar police - I think you mean "City were totally dominated". At least, I hope you do!

I agree with you though that you can't judge any striker on those three games when our midfield was so over-run.

Yeah nobody uses the word 'were' anymore. I mean, we rubbish last night, n't we?

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, JonDolman said:

We didn't play that 4141 with Fam up top in any of those games you say about that we lost, or in Barnsley game drew in.

We threw away a lead against Barnsley - felt at the time like a loss - still does. My point is we didn’t win. And the theory that we rigidly played 4 1  4 1 is also simplistic because Weimann never stayed in the 4 it was far more fluid than your post suggests. Wells would make any team in this division stronger its nonsense to think LJ had found the winning recipe before he joined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Dullmoan Tone said:

We threw away a lead against Barnsley - felt at the time like a loss - still does. My point is we didn’t win. And the theory that we rigidly played 4 1  4 1 is also simplistic because Weimann never stayed in the 4 it was far more fluid than your post suggests. Wells would make any team in this division stronger its nonsense to think LJ had found the winning recipe before he joined.

I'm not sure what relevance the Barnsley game has. 

4141 is a simplistic way of saying how we played. But it was clearly 4141 and not 442.

I'd say winning 4 games in a row is more of a winning recipe than what we are seeing at the moment.

I assume you think we are playing better now than we were in that run of games if you think Wells has improved us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wells got a hat-trick against us (Cardiff) last month. However, he had the outstanding Eberechi Eze to his left, a fantastic player who knows how to pick a pass. He also had Osayi-Samuel to his right, between them, they pulled us all over the pitch and supplied quality ball to Wells.

It's worth noting, however, that prior to that game game against us, Wells had not scored for nine games.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing that’s wrong with the set is that we set up not to lose instead of trying to win,

we sit back to wait for a mistake, it’s what the team has been instructed to do by johnson

we aren’t good enough to do that our strength should be quick passing to the wings and get crosses into the box

we don’t do that because they have been instructed to sit back and wait for a mistake

 

when we get rid of the real problem ie lee Johnson and his negative approach then this team would give anyone a run

johnson is trying to grind out results because he fears for his job in turn throwing everyone from Ashton to kalas under the bus in order to do so

his is a good coach he isn’t a leader and needs to be removed ASAP if this club is to progress

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Monkeh said:

The thing that’s wrong with the set is that we set up not to lose instead of trying to win,

we sit back to wait for a mistake, it’s what the team has been instructed to do by johnson

we aren’t good enough to do that our strength should be quick passing to the wings and get crosses into the box

we don’t do that because they have been instructed to sit back and wait for a mistake

 

when we get rid of the real problem ie lee Johnson and his negative approach then this team would give anyone a run

johnson is trying to grind out results because he fears for his job in turn throwing everyone from Ashton to kalas under the bus in order to do so

his is a good coach he isn’t a leader and needs to be removed ASAP if this club is to progress

This

2 seasons ago and our run that ended with Man City, compare that to last nights game! We are not a top European team but we gave Man City a game over 2 legs - now the man child couldn’t find a way past Shrewsbury!  Ffs he has to go! Being 7th is still good but does not even begin to reflect the dross he serves up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, dave36 said:

This

2 seasons ago and our run that ended with Man City, compare that to last nights game! We are not a top European team but we gave Man City a game over 2 legs - now the man child couldn’t find a way past Shrewsbury!  Ffs he has to go! Being 7th is still good but does not even begin to reflect the dross he serves up.

Any need?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Monkeh said:

The thing that’s wrong with the set is that we set up not to lose instead of trying to win,

we sit back to wait for a mistake, it’s what the team has been instructed to do by johnson

we aren’t good enough to do that our strength should be quick passing to the wings and get crosses into the box

we don’t do that because they have been instructed to sit back and wait for a mistake

 

when we get rid of the real problem ie lee Johnson and his negative approach then this team would give anyone a run

johnson is trying to grind out results because he fears for his job in turn throwing everyone from Ashton to kalas under the bus in order to do so

his is a good coach he isn’t a leader and needs to be removed ASAP if this club is to progress

Agree with a lot of your post but the quick passes to the wings and crossing strategy...

Not sure- quick passes to the wings and crosses into the box can a) Be an inefficient strategy ie goals v crosses ratio and b) Can leave a side more vulnerable on the break, in certain setups- because if a side loses the ball and is broke on quickly, this could be made more likely with a cross heavy approach- depending on how we set up and the type of crosses too, but an inefficent strategy makes losing possession more likely IMO.

Can leave a side open to being outnumbered in midfield, the quick counter or a combination of the two.

Edited by Mr Popodopolous

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Rocking Red Cyril said:

I just feel if you play Wells why not Palmer 

If you look at the start of the season Afobe, Palmer and Weimann was starting to look very good until Afobe's injury.

If Wells is closer to an Afobe type forward  than he is to a Famara type forward then it has to be worth considering, as long as we can somehow keep a solid midfield,which seems to be a problem. It would mean FD being left on the bench. which I reckon LJ is loath to do, as h has been Mr Reliable, but these are the tough decisions LJ is paid to make! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Agree with a lot of your post but the quick passes to the wings and crossing strategy...

Not sure- quick passes to the wings and crosses into the box can a) Be an inefficient strategy ie goals v crosses ratio and b) Can leave a side more vulnerable on the break, in certain setups- because if a side loses the ball and is broke on quickly, this could be made more likely with a cross heavy approach- depending on how we set up and the type of crosses too, but an inefficent strategy makes losing possession more likely IMO.

Can leave a side open to being outnumbered in midfield, the quick counter or a combination of the two.

I say it because its the personal we have and where our strength lays, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Monkeh said:

I say it because its the personal we have and where our strength lays, 

I'm not so sure- wingers in a 4-3-3 more as wider midfielders then maybe but I think we have a midfield capable of better possession than we're showing now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

I'm not so sure- wingers in a 4-3-3 more as wider midfielders then maybe but I think we have a midfield capable of better possession than we're showing now.

I said pass it to the wing, that doesn't necessarily means playing out and out wingers, it means utilizing the flanks getting into crossing positions , something that works so well with say attacking full backs and wide midfielders, (something we use to do) 

We look to rigid and need to be more fluid, that means when say we are breaking down the left with ellision and Dasilva over lapping, we'd also need other mdifielders dropping back to cover, 

We don't do that, we've become scared of making runs and taking responsibility and thats 1 person fault imo

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 26/02/2020 at 09:45, Hampshire Red said:

Great Post. He has looked league 1 so far and you can't blame the other players or the coach if you miss open goals, (Leeds, WBA) and don't put in effort (Huddersfield) 

He suits LJ then. 

LJ looks L1 at best most of the time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Cotswold, you may be one of the small minority, big keyboard type who frequent this City forum but since when has 'most of the time' been any time in the last four years when we have been competitive in the 2nd tier of English football, ie further from League 1 than most of the teams in the Championship. He has the same win ratio as his Dad (40%) and its all at this level, -  the highest we've been for 121 of our 125 years history. 

What are you on? Maybe you should look at Bristol Live (the other pessimists' bible as even they are saying BCFC should be optimistic; which of course we should be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...