Jump to content
IGNORED

LJ - "that was a very very good performance"


Lez

Recommended Posts

Just now, Lez said:

Bar 1 they were half chances at best.

Think the case is bar a very good free kick Forest had no more than a few half chances at best, which in itself is a solid away performance usually they didn't look like they were going to create anything in open play

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

I know people don’t want to hear this but we did play well & if we had played like this over the last 9 games more would be happy.

At the moment there is a hell of a lot of hindsight & sadly people wanting us to lose so they can bang their “LJ out” drum, but we were the better side first half against a top six side & on the balance of the game, deserved a point.

Not what many want to hear at present though, is it?

One good half in 9 games it was overdue but the end result was defeat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hodge said:

Think the case is bar a very good free kick Forest had no more than a few half chances at best, which in itself is a solid away performance usually they didn't look like they were going to create anything in open play

Yea it was solid enough. But we did not create enough, and the players weren't "outstanding" nor "very very good".....we were average....we were ok.......unfortunately at this level you play like that there is always the danger you will get beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hodge said:

Think the case is bar a very good free kick Forest had no more than a few half chances at best, which in itself is a solid away performance usually they didn't look like they were going to create anything in open play

Trouble is at this stage of the season we are looking for results rather than performances. Business end of the season and regardless of performance from the players and management we have 2 from 21 points. It's not good enough with 6 games to play and we are clutching at straws to grasp positives from another loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, collier said:

Trouble is at this stage of the season we are looking for results rather than performances. Business end of the season and regardless of performance from the players and management we have 2 from 21 points. It's not good enough with 6 games to play and we are clutching at straws to grasp positives from another loss.

I'm not disagreeing just commenting on what was said about the actual performance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ReggyRed said:

But it was a good performance and we did play well. There’s a  difference between a good performance and a good result....

Ahhh. Interesting point. Under LJ we’ve hardly ever had good performances, but we’ve had a lot of good results (or lucky as some would say). Ironic that it appears they weren’t the normal way round for LJ tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ReggyRed said:

But it was a good performance and we did play well. There’s a  difference between a good performance and a good result....

I will give you good......but LJ believed it was Very Very Good.......which it wasn't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look there seems to be a groundswell about everything being shocking and whilst our form has been shocking & yet again we’ve blown a good chance to secure play offs, let’s remain balanced.  Tonight was a good performance and thought we looked a team again rather than an 11 thrown together about 10 mins before Ko.

Overall, its a results business and we’ve been awful and yes LJ needs to go but at least remain balanced rather than go with the mob mentality of everything is shit as tonight wasn’t!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Banjo Red said:

He loves the club but it just isn't working.

I remember him saying he loved Barnsley but it means nothing he's been here 4 years if you cant do anything in that time then its time to go. Especially with a good budget. So yes it isn't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mozo said:

I'd describe it as bright, lively, full of effort. 

But we never troubled their keeper so it could hardly have been outstanding. 

Agree with this. 
We played better with the ball, but still created very little. A few corners early on, a couple of chances from crosses, but all very easy to defend. 
I think we were sussed. Teams know that away from home we tend to get results with 35% possession and counter attack. 
Forest were happy for us to have the ball - they had absolutely zero press - let us keep it and they know we can’t create. 
So yes, better with the ball, solid enough defensively, but zero cutting edge. 
That’s the sacrifice you make for solidifying midfield, 4 across the middle, all ‘runners’ and ‘tryers’ but not an ounce of creativity. Palmer made more incisive forward passes in 5 minutes than the other 4 in the rest of the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hodge said:

Think the case is bar a very good free kick Forest had no more than a few half chances at best, which in itself is a solid away performance usually they didn't look like they were going to create anything in open play

They didn’t really have to did they ? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a decent first half away performance because we played with a balanced well understood shape not fresh out of the lunatic tombola.

At half time I expected to see a change to make us a bit more solid in anticipation of Forest going at us hard, that didn't materialise.

We gave away a free kick we shouldn't have in a dangerous area and got punished.

An individual act of idiocy ruined our chances of getting anything from the game.

That's put the final nail in the coffin for the playoffs.

LJ didn't get himself any credit for that, he just stopped it eroding even further by not making amateur level errors.

There were some positives from players, and it wasn't dire, but there's a long way to go from that to playoff contenders still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, shelts said:

Compared to recent performances he’s not wrong !!

That's very true Shelts but we were starting extremely low eh! 

One half decent performance doesn't make up for the utter dross served up this season, regardless of result.

I wish LJ a successful career somewhere, just not at City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, hodge said:

Think the case is bar a very good free kick Forest had no more than a few half chances at best, which in itself is a solid away performance usually they didn't look like they were going to create anything in open 

That's not good enough though we needed to win. We needed to beat a good Forest team away because City under Johnson haven't won enough games against many average sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Harry said:

Agree with this. 
We played better with the ball, but still created very little. A few corners early on, a couple of chances from crosses, but all very easy to defend. 
I think we were sussed. Teams know that away from home we tend to get results with 35% possession and counter attack. 
Forest were happy for us to have the ball - they had absolutely zero press - let us keep it and they know we can’t create. 
So yes, better with the ball, solid enough defensively, but zero cutting edge. 
That’s the sacrifice you make for solidifying midfield, 4 across the middle, all ‘runners’ and ‘tryers’ but not an ounce of creativity. Palmer made more incisive forward passes in 5 minutes than the other 4 in the rest of the game. 

Agree and in his cameo for the last however many minutes Pato did more attacking and put in more dangerous crosses (1) than COD and Wieman managed for all their time on the pitch, we got a lot of crosses in but none of them were particularly good. 

If it were the other way round I would have been dissapointed to come away from that conceding any goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The old adage is that a successful team are able to win/grind out a good result, even when they play poorly or not to their best level of performance.  The one thing we have been able to do under LJ's managerial time (which must surely be over very soon) is an ability, when on a good LJ streak, to grind out a good result, especially away from home in the last 2 seasons. And that is fine, results are everything.  But when you lose that ability ie we took the lead against Blackburn against the run of play then capitulated, and in the last 2 games we have started brightly, not had the ruthlessness to take advantage, let in a goal and never looked like getting anything out of the game.  

LJ has had many extreme winning and losing streaks. Although we never know why they are so extreme, every team has a poor patch in a season.  But for a promotion chasing team a poor run is, say, having a run of 5 games when you only win 1, draw 2 and lose 2. Since we beat Derby, we have gained 2 points from 8 games.  Over a season a point per game would normally get you relegated.  And we NEVER have a good run when going to in the business end of the season with a play off place at stake.  This club, but particular this manager has the softes of soft underbellies.  

Basically, if you lose playing badly, lose when playing a bit better, and these bad streaks happen 2 or 3 times a season, it is time to get rid of the bloke in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...