Jump to content
IGNORED

Chris Hughton


Mattredrobin

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, glynriley said:

Blige! thats a shocking list when you see it laid out like that.

and your mate said we had "a brill squad"....

How have we ended up with a squad containing NINETEEN (I make it) Midfielders/Wingers? That's 4-5 players for each position depending on the system you use. Mental and incompetent management at the same time..........isn't this Mark Ashton's (or at least somebody's) job to say "hang on a minute, you want another bloody midfield player"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

 

That’s exactly it Big Tone.

Taylor and Wright is probably best part of £20k per week that we don’t need to carry into next season...a bit more if you add in Maenpaa too.

You could easily add in Smith (with a heavy heart) and Williams and in total you are probably talking £50k per week for those 5 players.  Of course club will potentially have budgeted for not offering any of them a new deal.

Here is what the new manager is “left” with.

3676F1F7-5829-481F-A21F-FAEC46D951C6.thumb.jpeg.1d6e5ed601004da2a2dc662b05c5f891.jpeg

There are some in that list to be ruthless about.

I know we have discussed this elsewhere but there is a job and a half to be done getting some of these off of our wage bill.

We have the “never really going to make it, but still seem to always get a new contract” types, the “punt from L1” types, the “not quite good enough, but signed from other Championship clubs, so on decent wages” types and the “batshit crazy, totally pointless signing” type, otherwise known as Rene Gilmartin, who you haven’t included, but he is supposed to be a player (unless back up goalkeeping coach is really a job).

Getting a minimum of 8 of these types off our salary costs this close season will be some achievement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Selred said:

Only are top top earners will be around the £20k mark. It's not an average wage for City. 

Palmer is on 25k a week and hasnt moad the match day squad most the season,

Afobe on 35k,wells probz around 30/35k, kalas will be on around 30k, Dasilva will be another high earner probably coming from chelsea 

You find our wage bill has crept up abit over last few years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

I know we have discussed this elsewhere but there is a job and a half to be done getting some of these off of our wage bill.

We have the “never really going to make it, but still seem to always get a new contract” types, the “punt from L1” types, the “not quite good enough, but signed from other Championship clubs, so on decent wages” types and the “batshit crazy, totally pointless signing” type, otherwise known as Rene Gilmartin, who you haven’t included, but he is supposed to be a player (unless back up goalkeeping coach is really a job).

Getting a minimum of 8 of these types off our salary costs this close season will be some achievement.

Totally agree. We have a bloated and completely unbalanced squad with far too many players that, being ruthless, will simply NEVER be good enough to get us to where we want to be. Never has the saying "less is more" applied to this football club as much as it does right now.

Punts, clubs in the bag, gambles, shots to nothing......................catches up with you in the end.

Unfortunately it could actually put off a decent manager from taking the job in the first place unless we have clear plans to get the huge amount of deadwood/also rans out of the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Robert the bruce said:

Sorry Tone,, I seem to have accredited you for Dave's wise words...

I'm sure you don't mind as were singing from the same hymn sheet..

Have a picture in your head of exactly how you wish your team to play - then recruit the players in their positions that will most likely be able to do that.

Simple eh ?...

You're forgiven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Highguy said:

Palmer is on 25k a week and hasnt moad the match day squad most the season,

Afobe on 35k,wells probz around 30/35k, kalas will be on around 30k, Dasilva will be another high earner probably coming from chelsea 

You find our wage bill has crept up abit over last few years

Those wages you quote sound way too high. Are you sure you're not just making stuff up? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Highguy said:

Palmer is on 25k a week and hasnt moad the match day squad most the season,

Afobe on 35k,wells probz around 30/35k, kalas will be on around 30k, Dasilva will be another high earner probably coming from chelsea 

You find our wage bill has crept up abit over last few years

What's your source for Palmers wage as well as the others? 

Aside from Afobe being reported I'd love to know where you got those from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Robert the bruce said:

Sorry Tone,, I seem to have accredited you for Dave's wise words...

I'm sure you don't mind as were singing from the same hymn sheet..

Have a picture in your head of exactly how you wish your team to play - then recruit the players in their positions that will most likely be able to do that.

Simple eh ?...

I’m not visioning us as Choir Boys!

14 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

How have we ended up with a squad containing NINETEEN (I make it) Midfielders/Wingers? That's 4-5 players for each position depending on the system you use. Mental and incompetent management at the same time..........isn't this Mark Ashton's (or at least somebody's) job to say "hang on a minute, you want another bloody midfield player"?

Booooooom ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Numero Uno said:

How have we ended up with a squad containing NINETEEN (I make it) Midfielders/Wingers? That's 4-5 players for each position depending on the system you use. Mental and incompetent management at the same time..........isn't this Mark Ashton's (or at least somebody's) job to say "hang on a minute, you want another bloody midfield player"?

It's 19 for every position using the system we have the last two games!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, IAmNick said:

And when the team is losing in the rain halfway through the season, or walking onto the pitch at Wembley for the playoff final do you want them to be thinking about the size of their bank balance and goal bonuses, or content with their pay and instead thinking about their personal achievements, their teammates, and their collective desire to win?

Why did Beckham or Ronaldo stay that extra hour in the gym - was it to earn more?

We're going to get off topic, but in general money is a poor motivator. There have been many studies and literature which show it I can link if you're interested.

Sorry if I was unclear I was referring to an incentivised salary package  purely for the manager.

  As Arnold Schwarzenegger once stated: “Money doesn’t make you happy. I now have $50 million but I was just as happy when I had $48 million.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Abraham Romanovich said:

I,m assuming you've never worked in a commission based business, or seen the rise in productivity when a piece rate scheme is introduced.

Given that football is a results based business given the choice :-

a) Take £20k a week with a £100k bonus if promotion is achieved or

b)Take £5k a week (more than PM earns by the way ) and say a £3m bonus if promotion achieved .

 

Motivation is a complex subject and there are many theories concerning it. One of the most respected is Maslow’s Hierarchy Of Needs.  The lowest level is  Physiological needs-  ie basic human survival needs include food and water, sufficient rest, clothing and shelter, overall health etc. The next level is Safety - eg health and financial security. Next come:

Love and Belonging - eg friendships and bonds, belonging to a team, forging an identity in a union, club, or group etc 

Esteem - which is based on respect and acknowledgment from others, and esteem which is based on your own self-assessment. 

 Self-actualization - the fulfillment of your full potential as a person. 

Money definitely helps someone achieve the two  basic levels but doesn’t really contribute to the 3 higher levels. Money is often a short term motivator and if someone can’t move onto the higher levels they will seek to move to somewhere that they can. In the football world there are plenty of examples of teams with highly paid players who achieve little but other teams of “lesser” lower paid players achieve more 

4 hours ago, IAmNick said:

In general I think money is a poor motivator of people. You need to pay people enough that they will come to work, and not feel hard done by (or be looking over the fence at what the person next to them is being paid) but beyond that, I think people are primarily driven by other things. Or rather - to effectively drive/motivate people to achieve money is actually pretty poor in that regard.

I don't think Hughton will be coming here and trying to get us promoted so he has an extra £%, or at least I'd hope not. I think he'd be doing it for personal or ambitious reasons. He wants to be in control, he wants to get better/test himself (and by extension the club), and he wants to contribute to something bigger than himself. The money should be enough to get him to do the job, but it shouldn't be the reason he's doing it.

edit: That goes for the players, and people in general as well.

@IAmNick - this is a much better summary of motivation and is the sort of  theory that successful leaders apply in all walks of life 
 

 

 

EAFF5321-57BE-49EE-B47E-7AB05D0D1D87.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Chappers said:

Well you seem pretty sure that we should chuck a lot of money at a managerial candidate!

If we are to progress then we have to take the bull by the gonads else continue as we are. I'm not saying a lot of money but we must pay the going rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, pongo88 said:

Motivation is a complex subject and there are many theories concerning it. One of the most respected is Maslow’s Hierarchy Of Needs.  The lowest level is  Physiological needs-  ie basic human survival needs include food and water, sufficient rest, clothing and shelter, overall health etc. The next level is Safety - eg health and financial security. Next come:

Love and Belonging - eg friendships and bonds, belonging to a team, forging an identity in a union, club, or group etc 

Esteem - which is based on respect and acknowledgment from others, and esteem which is based on your own self-assessment. 

 Self-actualization - the fulfillment of your full potential as a person. 

Money definitely helps someone achieve the two  basic levels but doesn’t really contribute to the 3 higher levels. Money is often a short term motivator and if someone can’t move onto the higher levels they will seek to move to somewhere that they can. In the football world there are plenty of examples of teams with highly paid players who achieve little but other teams of “lesser” lower paid players achieve more 

@IAmNick - this is a much better summary of motivation and is the sort of  theory that successful leaders apply in all walks of life 
 

 

 

EAFF5321-57BE-49EE-B47E-7AB05D0D1D87.png

Who would have thought Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs would appear on a thread considering whether or not to appoint Chris Hughton, is anyone able to argue a cast iron case for his appointment and expected salary requirements by using my own personal favourite theorem, Arbitrage Pricing .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrage_pricing_theory

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, pongo88 said:

Motivation is a complex subject and there are many theories concerning it. One of the most respected is Maslow’s Hierarchy Of Needs.  The lowest level is  Physiological needs-  ie basic human survival needs include food and water, sufficient rest, clothing and shelter, overall health etc. The next level is Safety - eg health and financial security. Next come:

Love and Belonging - eg friendships and bonds, belonging to a team, forging an identity in a union, club, or group etc 

Esteem - which is based on respect and acknowledgment from others, and esteem which is based on your own self-assessment. 

 Self-actualization - the fulfillment of your full potential as a person. 

Money definitely helps someone achieve the two  basic levels but doesn’t really contribute to the 3 higher levels. Money is often a short term motivator and if someone can’t move onto the higher levels they will seek to move to somewhere that they can. In the football world there are plenty of examples of teams with highly paid players who achieve little but other teams of “lesser” lower paid players achieve more 

@IAmNick - this is a much better summary of motivation and is the sort of  theory that successful leaders apply in all walks of life 
 

 

 

EAFF5321-57BE-49EE-B47E-7AB05D0D1D87.png

Yeah, that's exactly the sort of thing I was referring to.

If you've read "Drive" by Daniel H. Pink he breaks it down into three similar categories which I was broadly referencing above.

"Autonomy" - or can I do what I want / what I think I should be doing / solve problems my own way.

"Mastery" - is there opportunity to improve at what I'm doing.

"Purpose" - am I part of and contributing towards a greater vision/system/whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RedRoss said:

I don't get what correlation you've made. He's sold valued shares (last time I checked H&L were still trading?) and invested in us multiple times more than fans will have generated.

Whether or not he saves tax offshore what does that have to do with his investment in our club? He could of spent that elsewhere. If you we're responding to a moral question on tax I'd get your response.

Clearly way over your head

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BigTone said:

If we are to progress then we have to take the bull by the gonads else continue as we are. I'm not saying a lot of money but we must pay the going rate.

With minimal income? Normal times I’d agree, but it’s not normal times. If CH will work within limitations, fine. If not, why not just stick with Dean, then worry about the ‘Messiah appointment’ once there is certainty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chappers said:

With minimal income? Normal times I’d agree, but it’s not normal times. If CH will work within limitations, fine. If not, why not just stick with Dean, then worry about the ‘Messiah appointment’ once there is certainty.

Chappers, at this point in time we have no idea what will happen with income until a decision is made one way or the other. If they open the stadium with reduced capacity (which is most likely) then we can still derive extra income from Robin's TV to help cover some of the shortfall. Who knows what is going to happen ? I don't, you don't but either way the club needs to progress and maybe, just maybe we are strong enough financially to do so. Equally, to do so we must pay the going rate or otherwise tread water. We can save a small fortune by trimming the squad and concentrating on quality rather than quantity. We have some players I had forgotten about. Johnny Smith is one that comes to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Harry said:

As a further query then. 
Let’s say, to the best of our knowledge, that LJ earned £600k and Ashton earned £500k. 
Hughton wants £1m, but wants recruitment control. 
Do you now remove Ashton too, offer Hughton the £1m, and use the £100k surplus to appoint a different head of recruitment (or head scout in old money)? 

Yes, definitely. Recruitment has been a problem too…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...